KILL THAT LITTLE BIT-CH A-SS CIVIC!!! PLEASE NO STOCK CIVIC WILL BEAT ANY CAMARO WITH 8 UNDER THE HOOD... i didnt wana read the rest of these posts.... this was probably said several times..... unless he stoped by NASA and picked up a Saturn 5 rocket u should be fine!! smoke his a-ss then put it in reverse, catch up to him and throw it back into drive... and beat him agian.... thats all i gota say about that

said it before, he is NOT going to bite. just talk smack on how other people's civics rock and you can get so much stuff out of them (hp) i asked but he just backs away and stops talking when i tell him "lets race" but he is quick with the 100 hp per liter argument.
uhhhh.....
......oh and he says he hates "ricers" and he is a "tuner". doesn't want to get all that crazy TF&TF stuff for his car.
"I want a clean good looking car" is what he says, but still talks like a *****..........
later
biker

The guy is definately a poser if he wants to turbocharge the stock EX engine. If he had any clue about honda tuning he would be saving up for a B16/B18/H22. Modding the stock EX engine is just retarded.

what gets me is his arguement about the difference between the Si and EX.
he says the they are both :hail: VTEC:hail: and the only difference between them is that the Si has better heads and cam and thats why it has more hp. I'm like ok that makes sense.
i do some research last night and i find out that the EX is only 1.7L
(127 HP) not his 135 that he clams it is.
and the Si is 2.0L (160hp)
he says a EX is a better "tuner" car and you can get a EX better than a Si buy getting the heads-cam swap on the EX.
his arguement is the extra $$$ you spend on a Si is not worth it.
hmm it might make sense........
but silly me th way i think is....
why get a 305 spend $$$ to make it fast
or get a 350 spend $$$ and make it faster
silly *****......
later
biker