Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

73 Trans Am vs. 89 GTA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2002, 09:58 PM
  #1  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
OUTATIME GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 5,247
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Axle/Gears: 3.27/9-bolt
73 Trans Am vs. 89 GTA

Just for fun, what do you guys think. ..

A stock 73 Trans Am 455 (not superduty) a/t
i think they are 270hp/370tq, 3900lbs??

vs.

my 89 GTA (single cat, listed below)

yes the 455 is quicker stock for stock, but say i throw on these planned mods. ..

- fully tuned, ignition, sfc's, airfoil
- cold air setup
- full exhaust
- intake runners

close? what else would i add to keep up/win?
just curious how our newer technology fares against the old.

Last edited by OUTATIME GTA; 07-02-2002 at 10:02 PM.
Old 07-02-2002, 10:30 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
ChillPhatCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LaFayette, NY
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
I say it's a tie... you probably end up with more Hp, but with the right tires the '73 will hook like a ****...
Old 07-03-2002, 06:37 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
'73 T/A without a dubt.
Old 07-03-2002, 07:59 AM
  #4  
Member

 
Nonni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: ICELAND
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: ZZ383
Transmission: TH700R4 Raptor
Axle/Gears: 2,7x -> 3.00 or 3.50
If I was into gambling I would put my money on the 73 455, it will win if it is in good shape. My brother has a 74 T/A, 455 and it much quicker than any LS1 car I have seen (ok, its not stock, but who is ).

Just race him and have fun

Nonni
Old 07-03-2002, 01:02 PM
  #5  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
OUTATIME GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 5,247
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Axle/Gears: 3.27/9-bolt
is it because they have such monster torque or what?

or were they underrated from the factory with those hp #'s as well?
Old 07-03-2002, 01:43 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
They were under rated for insurance reasons, and '73 HP ratings were also NET ratings instead of GROSS .
Gross rating is when they used to dyno an engine with no acessorys on it (most shops still use this method of engine dynoing) and with open headers.
Net rating is the method thats still used today(for the most part at the factory) its dynoing a motor through its transmission with all if its acessorys and through stock manifolds and mufflers.I dont know if they still dyno motor trough the tranie today or not.
Net ratings knocked between 50 - 70 hp + ftlbs. off back then, now on late model cars its only about a 30- 40 hp and ftlbs loss.

Last edited by SOLID LIFTER; 07-03-2002 at 01:47 PM.
Old 07-05-2002, 02:16 AM
  #7  
Moderator

Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
OUTATIME GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sac, CA
Posts: 5,247
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Car: '89 GTA
Axle/Gears: 3.27/9-bolt
so it really has like 350hp?? that's crazy, that would mean the superduty had over 400. ..
Old 07-05-2002, 08:52 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by hovrbord98
so it really has like 350hp??
No the Base 250 (net) hp 455 would have had about 320 hp, the 455 HOs of 71 +72 were down rated to 335 hp but they actually made about 360-370 (GROSS ) HP

Originally posted by hovrbord98
that's crazy, that would mean the superduty had over 400. ..
About 390 hp, the SD had round port RA IV heads that flowed 20% more air on the in. side and 30% on the ex. side, it also had a bigger ex. valve than the standard 455(1.77 SD, 1.66 standard), The sd used the same cam as the RA IV w/ .470"in. / .470 ex. lift + .308* in. / 320* ex. adv. duration, The SD used a Q-jet that flowed 830cfm as aposed to the standard 455s 750cfm,it had hi flowing exhaust manifolds, the SD also had a Nudular crank, fordged rods and pistons, a reinforced block , an 80 psi oil pump, and a provision for a dry sump oiling system. considering that the SD ran 13.2-13.5 back in the day on $#!+ tires, an auto tranie,3.42 gear,a 3700 lbs. weight, and a sissified magizine writer driving, 390 hp is'nt that hard to swallow.

ps: some people say the SD had 450hp, but I HIGHLY dubt it, then again they run the same times or better than Hemi cudas and the LS6, So maybe Im wrong about that.

Last edited by SOLID LIFTER; 07-05-2002 at 09:03 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The_Phoenix
Interior Parts for Sale
12
02-04-2016 07:10 AM
SLNTSCPE
Tech / General Engine
3
08-22-2015 09:15 PM
stalkier
Electronics
1
08-21-2015 01:54 AM
gta power
Exhaust
1
08-13-2015 06:15 AM
LilHot
South Central
1
08-10-2015 03:56 PM



Quick Reply: 73 Trans Am vs. 89 GTA



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 AM.