Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

5.slows

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 12:59 AM
  #1  
zerotosixtyV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: MO
Car: Camaro
5.slows

what do these hunks of crap run from the factory? some cocky *** with a 91 5.slow POS thinks he can hang with my 350, I'd very much like to school him hardcore. I've walked buslengths on a '94 5.0 and an '88 5.0, both were 5-speeds. This '91 is a 5.piece of **** is a 5-speed, he keeps talkin **** about how he smokes 5.7 TPIs all the time. My personal best has been a 14.6, I've read pieces can run from a 14.7-15.8 depending on the driver and options. Anyone else have experience. 215 HP is pretty close to what 350s are putting to the ground, maybe 15 HP off, and these cars are torqueless! only a 100-200 lbs lighter for the hatchbacks. What has been everyone elses experience?
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 01:50 AM
  #2  
12sMustang's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
My experience is that you're way more cocky than your car is fast. He sounds cocky, too. If you're so damned confident why are you in here? Just go race him and find out

Chris
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 02:03 AM
  #3  
zerotosixtyV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: MO
Car: Camaro
Originally posted by 12sMustang
My experience is that you're way more cocky than your car is fast. He sounds cocky, too. If you're so damned confident why are you in here? Just go race him and find out

Chris
Just figuring out what the 90s fox bodies runs. I have no doubts he'll be buslengths behind like the others, but double checking. I personally fell victim to similar situations against my buddies 92 formula 350. he said speed density/twin cat was a bit faster, didn't buy it, ran him, lost, my nose at this rear quarter panel. We were both stock. But yeah, I'm running his *** this weekend, should be good, probably won't be. it's bone stock for crying out loud!
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 03:04 AM
  #4  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
14.6.. looks like you need to stop yellin... most 5.0's i see run 14.0-14.5... Its a drivers race, as it has been since 87 when they (finaly) dropped the 350 in the fbody. Hope he doesnt have any mods, cause thoes 5.0's respond very well to mods. and from the looks of your car, your very stock. I would start to really get your times down into the lower half of 14's. If both cars are stock.. .its gunna come down to whos got the bigger mouth... I am not flamming, and i do not like 5.0's as much as i dont like imports. Race him and find out who gets shut up. Post results too.. i wana see who wins.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 03:17 AM
  #5  
12sMustang's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
91 GT 5.0 will be in the 14.4-14.8 range depending on options - assuming good driver/condition.

If I were forced to bet, I'd bet on you, but only because you've already run 14.6s which means your a capable driver with car that is not in bad tune, which I can't say for the 5.0 driver.

If I were to race you with my ol' stocker, I'd bet on me, but that's because I've put my share of mid 14 second 350s and LT1s away at the dragstrip.

Chris
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 08:43 AM
  #6  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
I have beaten my fair share of 5.0's and 4.6 stangs, but i have also lost to more

most around here are usually modded and pretty quick.

good luck in the race..
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 09:27 AM
  #7  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 11:45 AM
  #8  
jeff1367's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Oak Lawn, IL
I agree with what the others said....If your best is a 14.6, and he is stock, this should be a very close race.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #9  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by Nic

Originally posted by 12sMustang
If I were forced to bet, I'd bet on you, but only because you've already run 14.6s which means your a capable driver with car that is not in bad tune, which I can't say for the 5.0 driver.


Originally posted by 12sMustang
My experience is that you're way more cocky than your car is fast. He sounds cocky, too. If you're so damned confident why are you in here? Just go race him and find out

Chris
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 12:45 PM
  #10  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Awfully confident for a mid/high 14 second car aren't we ?

I've seen STOCK Fox bodies that would literally buslength you.

It should be a good race though. And if he has any mods whatsoever (even small stuff), and can at least drive half-assed, you can kiss your *** goodbye. "5.slow's" are very capable cars, and they do make good torque BTW...
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 04:47 PM
  #11  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
First off very nice attitude about a car just as fast as yours!

Second a 5.0 will run mid 14s stock if driven well. The 350 L98 verse the 5.0 was great competition. With your time already posted it should be a good run, unless he is modded. A modded 5.0 is a 13 second contendor without any issues!

I dont know who will win the race, but with an attitude like that and only a 14.6 you are asking for trouble, IMO.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 05:18 PM
  #12  
fast86z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Dash PT, WA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: WC T5
Dude you are way too cocky, my best time so far is also a 14.6 but I still act like I have a 15 second car because if i get too cocky Im gonna end up gettin my *** beat(literally)...Yes most of us prefer fbodies over the stangs but thats because this is a fbody website. I have the uptmost respect for stangs and any other car that is fast whether it be import or domestic, 99% of imports arent fast so you dont need to worry about those...but Im sure my 6'4 300lb buddy with a street driven 10sec lx wouldnt mind handing you your ***...your car isn't fast enough to be as cocky as you are, 14s by todays standards isnt that fast.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 05:26 PM
  #13  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
Originally posted by fast86z28
...but Im sure my 6'4 300lb buddy with a street driven 10sec lx wouldnt mind handing you your ***...
Thats a huge bitch..... plus that totaly destroys what hes tryin to say here... Im sure there have been plenty of modded fbodies that have shown that guy what its like to be on the receiving end of a killer small block.

Back to the thread..... Go race the dam stang... you talk a lot, so back yourself up. Better come back with a win, or its time to tone yourself down. Its always good to see stock for stock to butt heads and see which car is still king after all these years.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 05:39 PM
  #14  
406TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: RI
I respect 5.0 Mustangs. They're quick stock and with a few mods can be very quick. I wouldn't go calling them 5.slows. They have 300lb/ft torque stock so I wouldn't call them "torqueless." Plus they are lighter than F bodies. A member here posted an article about an '87 LX 5.0 that ran 13.9 in the 1/4 with increased timing, tire pressure adjustments and a few test runs at the track. Would you call that stock LX a 5.slow?? BTW, just race the kid and see what happens.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 05:40 PM
  #15  
f-crazy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
yea dude your to cocky..a 14.6 is a good time for a stocker, but your setting yourself up for a let down...

i have a 91 gta lb9 t-5 g92 and i woul dof loved to be the one to quite you down...
my mods are a flowmaster k&n and some minor plenum porting
i run consistan 14.2-3 but my best is a 14.1@96

i have a quick car but im not cocky...around every corner is a car that shut u down faster then u can say "WTF was that?"...

go out and race him...hope hes stock or cant drive...its a driver race as it alwasy was between both 5.0's and the l98....either car g92 lb9...the l98 and the ho302 could win any 3 way race out there stock for stock...
ive beat stock lx's and l98 formulas..and ive lost to the same cars..

have fun and bring in another win for the bowtie!!!
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #16  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 08:34 PM
  #17  
zerotosixtyV8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
From: MO
Car: Camaro
if he's a good driver he'll run a 14.7, I'm yet to lose to a 5.0 mostly because I am careful about the races I pick lol. His car is bone stock. and where'd you get 300 ft. lbs? I've always read 280 ft. lbs for the 5.0, and it's completely irrelevant to tell me what a modded 5.0 can run, I'm sure there are plenty of people with modded 3rd gens here that run damned fast. I don't get why everyone thinks I'm cocky? He is the one saying he's smoked 5.7 TPIs right and left and that he could walk on any 3rd Gen, I'm just venting here. My car is slow as ****, as are 5.0s for that matter. and saying 99% of imports is slow... that's not cocky, how do you figure? I'd get my *** handed by any stock TT Supra, RX-7, 3000GT or 300ZX with a good driver and those car mop up stangs right and left modded and stock but whatever, including your 300 lb friends 10 second LX, but that car is far from stock so what the hell is your point? oh you don't have one, n/m what do you run? I'm running him this weekend should be good.

Last edited by zerotosixtyV8; Apr 14, 2003 at 08:39 PM.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 08:54 PM
  #18  
406TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: RI
Originally posted by zerotosixtyV8
His car is bone stock. and where'd you get 300 ft. lbs? I've always read 280 ft. lbs for the 5.0. I'm running him this weekend should be good.
Check out mustanggt.org. The 1991 5.0 puts out 225 HP/300 TQ.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #19  
BadBowtie88's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
Dude, regardless of all the opinions of everyone in the world about I've seen this, or I've watched that do this.... Gimme a break, whatever happened to "street racing"??!! Hell I had two races tonight just driving around. If you pull up next to someone, guess what?...on the street you have no clue what the other guy has or what he runs. Just race the damn thing and see what happens. Ok so a stock 5.0 is supposed to run this and a stock 5.7 is supposed run that...who cares every car is different and I think the times on this board prove that. As is everyone's version of "stock". Win or lose street racing is a blast, so just freakin do it and let us know who wins...
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 10:24 PM
  #20  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
Well seeing as that a stock 5.0 I personally know of put down 212 rwhp and 276 rwtq, I think the numbers you found are a little off.

I dont mind competition but when you are bashing on a car that is just as fast as yours you are acting stupid. A 5.0 is not slow, if it will run the same times you are pulling. And the best part is when you mod you dont need to touch the motor until you are in the 12s! Very nice IMO!
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 10:43 PM
  #21  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
I think you should be prepared for a close race, and stop running your mouth
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 11:26 PM
  #22  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
I hope the mustang rapes you.




I'd take a fox over a fbod though............
just look at the facts

Last edited by brodyscamaro; Apr 14, 2003 at 11:29 PM.
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 11:41 PM
  #23  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
Originally posted by 406TA
Check out mustanggt.org. The 1991 5.0 puts out 225 HP/300 TQ.

I will never EVER take word for word anything that comes from a stang site. Lets not bring up the 99 Cobra fiasco and the new 03 cobra... lets say Ford is usualy a little over zealous on the HP/Torq. ratings. Race this POS and come back with a win for the home team. Weekend it to far away.. this is gunna get locked before that happens. I think you got a good chance...
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 08:53 AM
  #24  
406TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: RI
Originally posted by bigals87z28
I will never EVER take word for word anything that comes from a stang site. Lets not bring up the 99 Cobra fiasco and the new 03 cobra... lets say Ford is usualy a little over zealous on the HP/Torq. ratings.
I think almost all the 5.0's from 87-93 (?) were rated at 225HP/300TQ.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 09:03 AM
  #25  
CrispyClutch's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Arcata, California
My cousin raced a 5.0 with me in the car, an igloo cooler full of ice and Mountain Dew.... My cousin had a '88 Trans Am GTA... Took the Mustang, 88-90ish body style without too much trouble.

Oh yeah, one more thing, we were also towing a 850cc Dirtbike on a bike trailer hitched to the GTA as well... Since then, mustangs have warranted little if no respect from me.

No ****, it really happened like that.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 09:11 AM
  #26  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
good kill man! kinda object to the trailor hitch, but to each its own.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #27  
CrispyClutch's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Arcata, California
Yeah he just had it to tow his dirtbike. Not a very big deal. I have a small boat I tow with my car every once in a while.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 10:02 AM
  #28  
406TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: RI
Stock vs. stock I think the late 80's LX 5.0's were a little bit quicker than the 5.7 GTA's. But most of the time on the street it would be a driver's race. Speaking of GTA's I absolutely annihilated one in my '79 Camaro (junkyard 400sbc). My Camaro ran mid-high 13's. Then again, I smoked a late 80's LX 5.0 also!
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 11:36 AM
  #29  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
Crispy Clutch if he had an auto and it was beat I might be able to see that but otherwise there is more to that story.

bigals87z28, the 99s did have issues but the 03 Cobras are underrated beyond belief. Thye are putting down anywhere from 355-390 rwhp stock, so Ford did do it right this time.

As far as no respect for the 5.0s how can you not respect a car that with stock parts or mild bolt-ons will wipe the floor with the L98 with similar mods. You put a full exhaust, gears, and drah radials on both and watch the Mustang pull near 12s, and the L98 is barely running mid to high 13s! I'm not ******* on the F-bodies (I like them alot too) but how can you show little to no respect for a car just as fast, if not faster than yours, with more potential!
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 11:48 AM
  #30  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Ever notice that ignorance and cockiness are directly proportional?
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 11:59 AM
  #31  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
I agree with 5.0mustang and Nic 100%. They are right on this one. The ignorance of some people on this board is terrible.
:hail: GM
Nope, there is more then one car company
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:05 PM
  #32  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Just as long as I don't start seeing

:hail: Honda

then this board is still cool with me
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:10 PM
  #33  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
ok.. dont wana get off the subject of calling this guy ignorant, but your saying that the 03 cobra is putting 355-390 at the wheels right? and what do they run... mid 12's? So lets see... A stock LS1 puts out 315-320 to the ground and CAN run high 12's. so your saying that with a little exhaust work, intake, and gear swap to run 12's.. your saying all that work gave them an extra 40-70hp?.... I really think that the 390hp is a little high. I think thoes ratings you posted are a little high... they probably gressed the bearings on the dyno while running the car. I know the new 03's are fast, but 390 at the wheels is a little far fetched.. maybe with 20-25lbs of boost. anyway... Kick this 5.0's @$$ so all this can end. Good luck and wipe the floor with that 5.0. Cant wait to get back on the road and start killin 5.0's and 4.6's...
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:12 PM
  #34  
fast86z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Dash PT, WA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LB9
Transmission: WC T5
Originally posted by zerotosixtyV8
if he's a good driver he'll run a 14.7, I'm yet to lose to a 5.0 mostly because I am careful about the races I pick lol. His car is bone stock. and where'd you get 300 ft. lbs? I've always read 280 ft. lbs for the 5.0, and it's completely irrelevant to tell me what a modded 5.0 can run, I'm sure there are plenty of people with modded 3rd gens here that run damned fast. I don't get why everyone thinks I'm cocky? He is the one saying he's smoked 5.7 TPIs right and left and that he could walk on any 3rd Gen, I'm just venting here. My car is slow as ****, as are 5.0s for that matter. and saying 99% of imports is slow... that's not cocky, how do you figure? I'd get my *** handed by any stock TT Supra, RX-7, 3000GT or 300ZX with a good driver and those car mop up stangs right and left modded and stock but whatever, including your 300 lb friends 10 second LX, but that car is far from stock so what the hell is your point? oh you don't have one, n/m what do you run? I'm running him this weekend should be good.
When I said 99% of imports I was referring to the hondas, eclipses, the normal r!ce stuff. how many TT supras, Turbo Rx7s, vr4 300gts, or tt 300zs do you see every day? I would say that out of all the imports you are lucky if 1% you see in a day are any of those cars. And you are cocky, I know my buddies 10sec lx is far from stock, but I was just usin him as an example, there is no reason at all for you to be referring to them as 5.slows, with a good driver and bolt ons these cars have a lot more potential than l98s, and I also already told you my best time is 14.6 also, I still think my car is slow, and don't go around disrespecting other people and their cars because I have a 14 sec timeslip which imo isnt very impressive.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:46 PM
  #35  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
HA the 302 has more what then a 350? my friend, the 350 is the most widly used engine in the world. 350's will always be stronger then 302's. 10k in a l98 fbody and 10k in a stang.. if they weight the same, i say the fbody comes out on top.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 01:15 PM
  #36  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
bigal you need to get your facts right buddy. A carbed 350 is better but when we talk about fuel injection the 5.0 is a much better motor merely because of the strong aftermarket. with the same combo I have ($250 for intake and Tbody, $150 for RRs) add a Mass Air Meter, and $600 heads and you have an easy mid 12 second car. How do I know, my dad is doing this with his car as we speak, picking up the Explorer heads today!

I am sorry but over $500 for a TPI intake is a total joke, and those are the cheap ones. Plus the exhaust components are twice as expensive and the Mustangs suspensions in stock form are very good for racing!

Put $10,000 in both a fuel injected L98 and a fuel injected 5.0 and I hate to break the news, but the 5.0 will walk away with it!
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 02:34 PM
  #37  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Put $10,000 into either motor and if you're not running making enough power to run 9's then you're doing something wrong.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 02:52 PM
  #38  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by 5.0mustang
bigal you need to get your facts right buddy. A carbed 350 is better but when we talk about fuel injection the 5.0 is a much better motor merely because of the strong aftermarket. with the same combo I have ($250 for intake and Tbody, $150 for RRs) add a Mass Air Meter, and $600 heads and you have an easy mid 12 second car. How do I know, my dad is doing this with his car as we speak, picking up the Explorer heads today!

I am sorry but over $500 for a TPI intake is a total joke, and those are the cheap ones. Plus the exhaust components are twice as expensive and the Mustangs suspensions in stock form are very good for racing!
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #39  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Revere, MA
Re: 5.slows

Originally posted by zerotosixtyV8
what do these hunks of crap run from the factory?



My personal best has been a 14.6, [/B]
That's what 5.slow POS ran Bone stock. It's automatic too. I'd imagine i would have been quicker with a 5-spd.

Of course my hunk of crap isn't stock anymore.



C'mon, we have this SAME EXACT thread 5 time a week. The majority agree than a 350 F-bod and a 302 Mustang 5-spd (some AOD's too) will run neck and neck and it can go either way any race. Then we get the loyalists who will swear up and down that nothing can beat brand X car. So let's grow up, open your minds and shut the hell up. You findone being cocky about their car, then beat the driver but you still gotta respect what the car can do.

Like i've said before. The cocky driver's are the ones compensating for slower cars. It's the modest driver's you need to watch out for. You'll see
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #40  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
that with stock parts or mild bolt-ons will wipe the floor with the L98 with similar mods. You put a full exhaust, gears, and drah radials on both and watch the Mustang pull near 12s, and the L98 is barely running mid to high 13s!
i know you Mustang guys arent all that familiar with the GM options and all (i know your still learning), but just to set the racord straight, a L98 will run neck and neck with a similarly modded 5.0 Stang. you see, the L98 was only offered in one GM platform... the Corvette. all fbodies got an iron headed, restricted exhaust version called B2L. go look on any 3rd gen option sheet and you WILL NOT find L98 anywhere.

heres the formula for going 12s in a L98:
- flowmaster catback ($350)
- MAD front ypipe ($200)
- K&N filter w cut lid ($50)
- BFGoodrich drag radials ($325)
- GM 2500 stall converter ($200)
total cost - $1125

once again... mod for mod... an L98 will run right with (or pass) a 5.0

Last edited by tpivette89; Apr 15, 2003 at 04:00 PM.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #41  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
tpivette, you are right but an L98 Fbody will not.

Put that similar recipe to the Mustang
-Flowmaster cat-back (250)
-Off Road H-pipe (150)
-Headers (160)
-Pulleys (80)
-BFGoodrich Drag Radials (325)
-FMS 4.10 gears (150)
Total (1115)

And that can put you 12.9s all day!

I'm not ******* on the L98 (especially the Vette L98) just proving the 5.0s capabilities!
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 04:26 PM
  #42  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
an L98 Fbody
AGAIN there is no such thing. L98s only came in Vettes. the correct term is B2L fbody
Headers (160), Pulleys (80), FMS 4.10 gears (150)
i thought we were talking mod for mod? a L98 doesnt need these extra mods to run 12s. a L98 car with a mod list like the one you posted would be an easy mid 12 second ride
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 04:37 PM
  #43  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
trying to do this mod to mod comparison is stupid, really. i will agree 100% that a SBC can be made to go very fast as well as a SBF. a "B2L" fbody is a great car, but your flat out stupid not to acknowledge a fox body stang as a great performance car also.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 05:28 PM
  #44  
406TA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: RI
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
trying to do this mod to mod comparison is stupid, really. i will agree 100% that a SBC can be made to go very fast as well as a SBF. a "B2L" fbody is a great car, but your flat out stupid not to acknowledge a fox body stang as a great performance car also.
I agree.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #45  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
Re: 5.slows

Originally posted by zerotosixtyV8
he keeps talkin **** about how he smokes 5.7 TPIs all the time.
that woulda been enough for me to set up a date and hope to shut his *** up. enough talk and go race. we're all eager to find out what happens.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 05:56 PM
  #46  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
trying to do this mod to mod comparison is stupid, really
im not sure why you think its not a good comparison to do a mod for mod shootout. take 2 different cars, do the exact same things to them, and which one is faster? i think its a good way to gauge the potential of a platform
but your flat out stupid not to acknowledge a fox body stang as a great performance car also.
just who exactly are you naming to be "flat out stupid". so if someone doesnt like a particular car, for whatever reason, they are the most braindead person on the planet huh?
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 06:12 PM
  #47  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
TPI is my kind of man! SMOKE THAT 5.0!! TPI cars respond to different types of mods then 5.0's do. See, if GM still made the 302, this would of been cooler, cause they we could see which is better (we all know Chevy's would be) Tpi has many flaws for FI. and an intake for 600? try out the lt1 intake for around 400, and you got great FI set up. It comes down to that since 87, Fbodies have been running 5.0's... and this went all the way to 2002. Go smoke this guy so we can see who wins this little online flare up.
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 07:47 PM
  #48  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by tpivette89
im not sure why you think its not a good comparison to do a mod for mod shootout. take 2 different cars, do the exact same things to them, and which one is faster? i think its a good way to gauge the potential of a platform
Because different cars respond different mods differently. The first mod you do to a 1991 Mitsu Eclipse GSX is not the same first mod you do to a 1989 Corvette or a 2001 Camaro SS. See? These are "big differece" examples, but they get the point across. I can see why you think it's a good way to gauge the potential because the V8 fuel injected Mustang is in a very close category (if not the same) as a L98 Corvette. I don't know a whole lot about Mustangs, but a very popular mod seems to be gears. That mod doesn't seem as popular for the vette, does this mean you should say, "Ha, the mustang needs gears to do............."
And let's just say you do a mod by mod thing with a B2L Camaro and a 5.0L 5 speed Mustang. The Mustang mods are cheaper (in general) so exhaust and simple intake parts are cheaper. Point goes to the Mustang in my opinion.


Originally posted by tpivette89
just who exactly are you naming to be "flat out stupid". so if someone doesnt like a particular car, for whatever reason, they are the most braindead person on the planet huh?
Did you read what I typed? Here it is again.

but your flat out stupid not to acknowledge a fox body stang as a great performance car also.

In my opinion if anybody does not acknowledge the 5.0L Fox body Mustang as a great performance car they are stupid. I'm not saying your in that category (although you sound like you could be) I'm just saying they're a great performance car (more popular in 1/4 mile drag form).
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 08:12 PM
  #49  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
I think it's time for my pic
Attached Thumbnails 5.slows-iroc-mustang-5-copy.jpg  
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 08:46 PM
  #50  
BillZ28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Car: 84 Z28
Originally posted by Mark A Shields
I think it's time for my pic

What is fightHing?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 PM.