92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
05-21-2008, 01:48 PM
#51
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY sucks
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
you can have your SHOs they are nothing special... i would take a Camaro or firebird over a taurus anyday. even if they are slower. 
05-21-2008, 08:56 PM
#54
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY sucks
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
no offense but i know as a fact that when a car gets loaded up they become dogs... and i never was uncomfortable in my car even in the back seat. basically personal preference.
, for the driver its comfy thats about it unless your a lil kid
05-22-2008, 02:38 PM
#56
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY sucks
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
that comparing apples to oranges... its like saying my caprice is comfy but my camaro isn't.. i think the camaro is not bad for the size....
05-23-2008, 06:03 AM
#57
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 499
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock
05-23-2008, 10:31 AM
#58
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY sucks
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
lol yea thats true, i don't find it uncomfortable but other ppl do lol o well i'm the driver so too bad! ha ha ha
05-24-2008, 09:36 PM
#59
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pueblo CO,
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 formula/69 beetle
Engine: 355/2.1
Transmission: T.C.I streetfighter th350/5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 lsd/
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
hmm. 3.4 v8???? in a sho... last time i was under the hood of the last gen sho it had a 4.6 from a mustang but some stupid plenum ive never seen befor.. this could have been a swapped car but i dont know why anyone would spend the money,,, other than that all i have seen is the super high output v6 WITCH IS A YAMMAHA NOT SUZUKI.. but they have to retarded high compression stock to run boost without hurting internals... anyway they arent slow i know sho's are ford stupid sleeper
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?
Last edited by chaoz28; 05-24-2008 at 09:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
05-25-2008, 12:19 PM
#60
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY sucks
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.
hmm. 3.4 v8???? in a sho... last time i was under the hood of the last gen sho it had a 4.6 from a mustang but some stupid plenum ive never seen befor.. this could have been a swapped car but i dont know why anyone would spend the money,,, other than that all i have seen is the super high output v6 WITCH IS A YAMMAHA NOT SUZUKI.. but they have to retarded high compression stock to run boost without hurting internals... anyway they arent slow i know sho's are ford stupid sleeper
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
