Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #51  
v10viper04's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

you can have your SHOs they are nothing special... i would take a Camaro or firebird over a taurus anyday. even if they are slower.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #52  
vipershark11's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

id take any gm except the geo part over a sho anyday too.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #53  
92SHO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

camaro's are fun but you cant carry any passengers comfortably, with the SHO you can carry them comfortably and quickly
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #54  
v10viper04's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Originally Posted by 92SHO
camaro's are fun but you cant carry any passengers comfortably, with the SHO you can carry them comfortably and quickly
no offense but i know as a fact that when a car gets loaded up they become dogs... and i never was uncomfortable in my car even in the back seat. basically personal preference.
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #55  
92SHO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

, for the driver its comfy thats about it unless your a lil kid
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #56  
v10viper04's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

that comparing apples to oranges... its like saying my caprice is comfy but my camaro isn't.. i think the camaro is not bad for the size....
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 06:03 AM
  #57  
86firebird350's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Rock Hill, SC
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Originally Posted by 92SHO
camaro's are fun but you cant carry any passengers comfortably
thats not true...you can carry ONE passenger comfortably
Reply
Old May 23, 2008 | 10:31 AM
  #58  
v10viper04's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

lol yea thats true, i don't find it uncomfortable but other ppl do lol o well i'm the driver so too bad! ha ha ha
Reply
Old May 24, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #59  
chaoz28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo CO,
Car: 87 formula/69 beetle
Engine: 355/2.1
Transmission: T.C.I streetfighter th350/5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 lsd/
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

hmm. 3.4 v8???? in a sho... last time i was under the hood of the last gen sho it had a 4.6 from a mustang but some stupid plenum ive never seen befor.. this could have been a swapped car but i dont know why anyone would spend the money,,, other than that all i have seen is the super high output v6 WITCH IS A YAMMAHA NOT SUZUKI.. but they have to retarded high compression stock to run boost without hurting internals... anyway they arent slow i know sho's are ford stupid sleeper
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?

Last edited by chaoz28; May 24, 2008 at 09:40 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old May 25, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #60  
v10viper04's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: NY sucks
Car: 84' Corvette, 96' Caprice
Engine: LT1, L99
Transmission: T-56, 4L60e
Axle/Gears: 3.07 POSI, 2.93 Open
Re: 92 RS VS Taurus on roids.

Originally Posted by chaoz28
hmm. 3.4 v8???? in a sho... last time i was under the hood of the last gen sho it had a 4.6 from a mustang but some stupid plenum ive never seen befor.. this could have been a swapped car but i dont know why anyone would spend the money,,, other than that all i have seen is the super high output v6 WITCH IS A YAMMAHA NOT SUZUKI.. but they have to retarded high compression stock to run boost without hurting internals... anyway they arent slow i know sho's are ford stupid sleeper
----------
err looked it up and now humbly take the foot out of my mouth. sho v8s are tiny lil things... that 4.6 was rwd as i remeber it wasnt stock for sure...... still dont understand why someone would swap a stang engine into a taurus.... why not get a stang?
I don't honestly believe they are that fast. Cars now a days can beat a modded SHO stock.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Veaceonee
Firebirds for Sale
11
Sep 29, 2016 08:15 PM
krisner89
Cooling
12
Oct 10, 2015 06:03 AM
MSRed91Camaro
Cooling
22
Oct 6, 2015 01:56 PM
armybyrd
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
2
Aug 28, 2015 03:38 PM
M1tch
Theoretical and Street Racing
28
Aug 14, 2006 12:29 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 PM.