Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

'82 5.0 litre 3-speed 2.73:1 rear - How fast ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2001 | 08:38 PM
  #1  
scotia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, UK
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: 305 Crossfire
Transmission: 200c Auto
'82 5.0 litre 3-speed 2.73:1 rear - How fast ?

What are the performance figures for an '82 Crossfire 5.0 litre TransAm , 3-speed auto with 2.73:1 rear end ? 0-60, 0-100 mph , can they pull out and overtake other cars travelling at, say, 60mph quickly (and safely) .The reason I'm asking is because I hear that this set-up is pretty leisurely , and would like to know just how it performs - before I go and get the rear end changed to 2.73:1 - any advice would be appreciated !!!
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2001 | 09:40 PM
  #2  
five7kid's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 46
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
According to the article just posted this weekend at https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/a...unerandt.shtml :

"The Z-28’s available fuel injected engine shifts the balance somewhat. It is markedly more powerful (an additional 20bhp) and responsive than the carbureted one, so much so that even with its automatic transmission it gives better acceleration times, 0-60 in 9.0 sec, the quarter mile in 16.8 sec and 81.0mph, and 0-100 in 28.0."

They didn't say what gears it had, but the tech data on these boards indicates 2.93s or 3.23s were standard and optional, respectively, with that engine. Since they did say it had disk rears, perhaps it had the 3.23s.

Perhaps you actually have 2.93s? And, I assume you meant getting new 3.73 gears. With the 3-speed auto, get used to a high reving engine on the open road with 3.73s, but the off-the-line and out-of-the-corners performance will be markedly improved.

------------------
82 Berlinetta, orig V-6 car, now w/86 LG4/TH700R4. 2.93 limited slip. Cat-back from '91 GTA, ZZ3 intake, Accel HEI SuperCoil. AMSOIL syn lubes bumper-to-bumper. Daily driver, work-in-progress (LG4 w/'87 LB9 block, ZZ3 cam, ported World 305 heads, Hooker headers & y-pipe, 3" Catco cat & 3" cat-back, Spohn SFCs).
57 Bel Air, my 1st car. '66 396, 9.7 CR forged TRWs, Weiand Action+, Edelbrock 1901 Q-Jet (Holley 3310 on the way), GK 270 cam, Magnum rockers, Jacobs Omnipack, 1-3/4" Hedders & 3" Warlocks, TH400 w/TCI Sat Night Special conv & Trans-Scat shift kit, MegaShifter, 3.08 8.2" 10-bolt w/Powertrax, AMSOIL syn lubes bumper-to-bumper. Idles smooth @ 600 RPM in D. Best 15.02/95.06 @ 5800' Bandimere (corrected 13.93/102.4 @ sea level).
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2001 | 12:58 AM
  #3  
recaro xfire's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: utah
i am the proud owner of a 83 recaro trans am
and im gonna put it to u straight. my stock t/a has 3.23 and a 700 r4 and has a little more power than ur car. the car u got would run close to a 19 second quarter mile time in utah so id say 18.3 or so in cali. i know u think im probably full of it but im totally serious a stock 82 cfi wont beat much of anything. especially with a 3 speed and 2.73's, i bet ull run a 0 to 60 time of 9 seconds or more. but i got a ton of ideas on how to beef up these machines to kick a little *** ! so does tom400cid! sorry for the bad news.
recaro xfire
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2001 | 04:26 PM
  #4  
scotia's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Scotland, UK
Car: 82 Trans Am
Engine: 305 Crossfire
Transmission: 200c Auto
Thanks for that guys. Will probably go for 2.93's or 3.23's instead of the 2.73's. At the moment I appear to have 3.73's , as the car overrevs like crazy , the speedo over reads as well (the diff was changed by a previous owner ). Thinking more in terms of quieter cruising , but not so much in that I am left with no power, so the 2.93 / 3.23 seem to be the better choices.

Thanks again for taking the time to answer - any tips on tuning one of these cars would be appreciated !

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
angel2794
Theoretical and Street Racing
25
Mar 7, 2026 01:08 PM
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
Mar 8, 2019 12:21 PM
Cleotiz
Electronics
7
Jan 6, 2018 08:56 PM
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
Dec 21, 2015 10:36 PM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 9, 2015 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM.