Auto just as good as 5 speed
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 90Iroc-Zee:
Oh, I guess we can't be cool and smoke cancer sticks, drink and drive, and molest little girls. I've ran anywhere from a 14.4 @ 94mph to a 15.2 @ 94mph. But hey roc, you keep drinking and driving and we will see how far you go DUMB *** . You and your Iroc-Z deserve to hit a few trees. It took me about 1 year to realize that being an ******* on the street has its price. I bet your around what...16-19 years of age? I'm 18 and I know a lot of people who are just like you. Your a bad kitty roc, your drunk *** should pull up next to me at the line, you'd get your *** handed to you, drunk ****. </font>
Oh, I guess we can't be cool and smoke cancer sticks, drink and drive, and molest little girls. I've ran anywhere from a 14.4 @ 94mph to a 15.2 @ 94mph. But hey roc, you keep drinking and driving and we will see how far you go DUMB *** . You and your Iroc-Z deserve to hit a few trees. It took me about 1 year to realize that being an ******* on the street has its price. I bet your around what...16-19 years of age? I'm 18 and I know a lot of people who are just like you. Your a bad kitty roc, your drunk *** should pull up next to me at the line, you'd get your *** handed to you, drunk ****. </font>
I prefer an auto for what I do which is drag race. I find it easier to launch with an auto than a manual too much wheel spin with manual the majority of the time. You can't screw up with an auto which is another big plus. If I did auto X more often with my car I would go with a manual but to be honest with you my 700R4 works fine for downshifting around the corners. I loose a little bit around the corners against the 5 speeds but once I hit a striaght away (especially 1/2 mile I love those
) I usually tear em a new ******* and it would usually take them 5 turns right after eachother to make up with what they just lost on the straight away. Its all personal preference. I also like being able to drink my coffie while I am driving or have a smoke or have my arm around a girl. My little POS VW Jetta was a 5 speed and I HATED long drives in that thing. Especially stuck in traffic jams FIRST SECOND FIRST SECOND FIRST SECOND FIRST.. FIRST SECOND MAKE KARSTEN GO CRAZY!!!
It really gets on your nerves after a while I found. Mind you it still was fun as hell when I decided to screw around in my car flying aroundn corners and stuff. But that all ended when I rolled my Jetta around an S bend 
------------------
Karsten
86 IROC-ZZ4... too much to list.
) I usually tear em a new ******* and it would usually take them 5 turns right after eachother to make up with what they just lost on the straight away. Its all personal preference. I also like being able to drink my coffie while I am driving or have a smoke or have my arm around a girl. My little POS VW Jetta was a 5 speed and I HATED long drives in that thing. Especially stuck in traffic jams FIRST SECOND FIRST SECOND FIRST SECOND FIRST.. FIRST SECOND MAKE KARSTEN GO CRAZY!!!
It really gets on your nerves after a while I found. Mind you it still was fun as hell when I decided to screw around in my car flying aroundn corners and stuff. But that all ended when I rolled my Jetta around an S bend 
------------------
Karsten
86 IROC-ZZ4... too much to list.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
The above sums my opinion up pretty well also. I personally could never drive an auto... only if for some odd reason I went completely against my roots and moved to a BIG city. I don't think people are sissies for driving autos, but it really bugs me when the only explanation someone offers is "it's too distracting" or "why would I do that? I hate driving" If someone were to say, it's very consistent and great for the strip, or I live in the city or I don't have a left foot... etc. you get the idea.
------------------
1984 Firebird - Daily driver, 305 LG4, 3.23 rear, T5 - Hurst short shifter, Edelbrock 600 CFM 1406 carb, Performer intake - Edelbrock Pro-Flow air filter, gutted cat, IROC 16x8 5 Spoke Wheels, AIWA bargain basement (from Sears of course) CD player, Eight-ball shift ****
Check out my ride here
"IT'S SNOWING! TO THE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT!" - The Mustang and Firebird face off in the dead of winter.
------------------
1984 Firebird - Daily driver, 305 LG4, 3.23 rear, T5 - Hurst short shifter, Edelbrock 600 CFM 1406 carb, Performer intake - Edelbrock Pro-Flow air filter, gutted cat, IROC 16x8 5 Spoke Wheels, AIWA bargain basement (from Sears of course) CD player, Eight-ball shift ****
Check out my ride here
"IT'S SNOWING! TO THE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT!" - The Mustang and Firebird face off in the dead of winter.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 1
From: Calgary
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
My old 87 305/5spd could smoke a 350/auto!
If you can shift could 9and launch) you get a lot more respect from people at the track!
If you can shift could 9and launch) you get a lot more respect from people at the track!
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 90Iroc-Zee:
Poor folks that couldn't afford a auto? Okay, thats why the newer (LS1) 6spds run a quicker time then the newer autos.
</font>
Poor folks that couldn't afford a auto? Okay, thats why the newer (LS1) 6spds run a quicker time then the newer autos.
</font>
------------------
"Putting any amount of money into a RICE BURNER is like wiping your a$$ with a turd. "
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ImportsRsloths:
BigBlock, Why are you pretending to like the automatic better, but "shift it like a manual"..... Just spend the money and see if you can bolt a 6 speed up to bigblock..... That would be the ultimate autocrosser.... 454 6 speed!!!!!!</font>
BigBlock, Why are you pretending to like the automatic better, but "shift it like a manual"..... Just spend the money and see if you can bolt a 6 speed up to bigblock..... That would be the ultimate autocrosser.... 454 6 speed!!!!!!</font>
------------------
"Putting any amount of money into a RICE BURNER is like wiping your a$$ with a turd. "
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
Blah, blah, blah, jeez so many posts, I got so bored I skipped a good 60% of them. Overused opinions and overused quotes. If you're racing a stick car, and he loses position due to his shifting. Then you're not racing a hard core stick shift driver. Because if you were, then the stick shifter would never take his foot off the gas once, for a drag. So if he does let his foot off to shift, than well he doesn't believe your car is worth screwing up his tranny.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by shrp1:
YEA well answer this:
WHY IS THE QUICKEST andFASTEST factory 3rd gen an AUTO. and yes they built one with a manual and it was slower.</font>
YEA well answer this:
WHY IS THE QUICKEST andFASTEST factory 3rd gen an AUTO. and yes they built one with a manual and it was slower.</font>
------------------
"Putting any amount of money into a RICE BURNER is like wiping your a$$ with a turd. "
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: LaFayette, NY
Car: '10 Subaru Forester
Engine: 2.5 Boxer
Transmission: 4EAT
Axle/Gears: 4.44
shrp... how about you back up this "info" with some solid numbers... I haven't heard anything about the TTA's having a 5 speed...
The reason they used an auto in the TTA is because the 700r4 is a much beefier tranny than the T-5.
What we lose during a shift, we make up with good timing plus some... just gotta chill people.
The reason they used an auto in the TTA is because the 700r4 is a much beefier tranny than the T-5.
What we lose during a shift, we make up with good timing plus some... just gotta chill people.
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ChillPhatCat:
shrp... how about you back up this "info" with some solid numbers... I haven't heard anything about the TTA's having a 5 speed...
The reason they used an auto in the TTA is because the 700r4 is a much beefier tranny than the T-5.
What we lose during a shift, we make up with good timing plus some... just gotta chill people. </font>
shrp... how about you back up this "info" with some solid numbers... I haven't heard anything about the TTA's having a 5 speed...
The reason they used an auto in the TTA is because the 700r4 is a much beefier tranny than the T-5.
What we lose during a shift, we make up with good timing plus some... just gotta chill people. </font>
ALSO, FYI, the TTA came with a 2004R transmission.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by shrp1:
ALSO, FYI, the TTA came with a 2004R transmission.
</font>
ALSO, FYI, the TTA came with a 2004R transmission.
</font>
------------------
"Putting any amount of money into a RICE BURNER is like wiping your a$$ with a turd. "
'86 IROC
T-TOPS, TINTED WINDOWS, BRAKE LIGHT BLACKOUTS
GM GOODWRENCH 350
EDELBROCK TES HEADERS
3" Hooker CatBack w/Aero Chamber muffler
EDELBROCK 600CFM CARB.
KN AIRFILTER
ACCEL HEI DISTRIBUTOR
160* Stat, just switched to 180* b/c of winter coming and going to college in the mts.
3:73 Posi
Rebuilt 700R4
B&M Megashifter, 5" Autometer Tach w/shift lite
no they used the 200r4 in the TTA. and the reason they didnt use the 5-speed is because of the extreme loss off turbo while shifting. talk to some of the TTA owners on here like Kyle F
------------------
1995 Camaro
3.4 with 4L60E
Stock...for now
Currently being redone:
1988 Camaro
2.8 with T5
threw a rod...
Soon to have a 350 TPI out of an '85 vette...
http://www.nothingssafe.com
------------------
1995 Camaro
3.4 with 4L60E
Stock...for now
Currently being redone:
1988 Camaro
2.8 with T5
threw a rod...
Soon to have a 350 TPI out of an '85 vette...
http://www.nothingssafe.com
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by nothingssafe:
no they used the 200r4 in the TTA. and the reason they didnt use the 5-speed is because of the extreme loss off turbo while shifting. talk to some of the TTA owners on here like Kyle F
</font>
no they used the 200r4 in the TTA. and the reason they didnt use the 5-speed is because of the extreme loss off turbo while shifting. talk to some of the TTA owners on here like Kyle F
</font>
AND yes same one they used in the GN/T-types
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Mark A Shields:
Really I thought they stopped using that tranny in the early 80's.
Originally posted by shrp1:
ALSO, FYI, the TTA came with a 2004R transmission.
</font>
ALSO, FYI, the TTA came with a 2004R transmission.
</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by shrp1:
YEA well answer this:
WHY IS THE QUICKEST andFASTEST factory 3rd gen an AUTO. and yes they built one with a manual and it was slower.</font>
YEA well answer this:
WHY IS THE QUICKEST andFASTEST factory 3rd gen an AUTO. and yes they built one with a manual and it was slower.</font>
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ChevyLuva3:
Umm, cuz back then they didn't make a manual tranny that could handle 350 power. Only auto could handle it, they could've made a better manual tranny, but remember these cars are supposed to be affordable while being on budget.
</font>
Umm, cuz back then they didn't make a manual tranny that could handle 350 power. Only auto could handle it, they could've made a better manual tranny, but remember these cars are supposed to be affordable while being on budget.
</font>
Phil
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Apeiron:
They stopped using the 200C. The 200-4R is a different animal.</font>
They stopped using the 200C. The 200-4R is a different animal.</font>
------------------
1989 20th Anniv Turbo Trans Am
minor bolt on upgrades
12.90 @ 110 on REAL radials and street trim.
Both trannies do have there good and bad points. I have test driven many cars in both auto and stick form. Here's a breakdown:
Sticks: Good:1.Definately a fun factor and contrary to poular belief, you can easily smoke a cigarette, drink, eat, make a phone call, fondle your girlfried and shift all at the same time. It's amazing what you can make your body capable of doing after awhile driving stick.2. Stock for Stock, sticks always run faster. This is true of every evenly set up stock car I have ever driven.3. Better overall control and usually a slight edge in fuel economy (auto's are quickly catching up though).
Sticks: Bad: 1.Usually more problematic in terms of reliability when driven hard.2. Much harder on rearends etc and cannot handle as much power due to the preloading advantage an auto has.3. Not as consistant at the drag strip. 4. At time's, they can be a hassle in traffic.
Auto: Good: 1.Can handle more power due to the preloading effect and cause less wear on your drivetrain. 2.A properly set up auto can be just as fun as a stick (well, close). 3.No bother in traffic. 4. Much more consistant at the track.
Bad:1. See funfactor.2. Usually less fuel efficient. 3. Less control and not suited for autox etc. Stock for Stock behind the same motor, they are usually slower.
There are definately advantages to both. Stock for stock in 3rd gens, like most cars really doesn't mean much, cause most are no longer stock. Many of the sticks advantages from the factory unfortunately dissapear quickly and can become a serious dissadvantage depending on how you drive (track/strip). This will always be an ongoing battle cause it seems stick guys get a kick out of breaking auto guys *****, but the fact is that either car can be just as potent and have serious advantages over eachother depending on there use.
Sticks: Good:1.Definately a fun factor and contrary to poular belief, you can easily smoke a cigarette, drink, eat, make a phone call, fondle your girlfried and shift all at the same time. It's amazing what you can make your body capable of doing after awhile driving stick.2. Stock for Stock, sticks always run faster. This is true of every evenly set up stock car I have ever driven.3. Better overall control and usually a slight edge in fuel economy (auto's are quickly catching up though).
Sticks: Bad: 1.Usually more problematic in terms of reliability when driven hard.2. Much harder on rearends etc and cannot handle as much power due to the preloading advantage an auto has.3. Not as consistant at the drag strip. 4. At time's, they can be a hassle in traffic.
Auto: Good: 1.Can handle more power due to the preloading effect and cause less wear on your drivetrain. 2.A properly set up auto can be just as fun as a stick (well, close). 3.No bother in traffic. 4. Much more consistant at the track.
Bad:1. See funfactor.2. Usually less fuel efficient. 3. Less control and not suited for autox etc. Stock for Stock behind the same motor, they are usually slower.
There are definately advantages to both. Stock for stock in 3rd gens, like most cars really doesn't mean much, cause most are no longer stock. Many of the sticks advantages from the factory unfortunately dissapear quickly and can become a serious dissadvantage depending on how you drive (track/strip). This will always be an ongoing battle cause it seems stick guys get a kick out of breaking auto guys *****, but the fact is that either car can be just as potent and have serious advantages over eachother depending on there use.
As a response to an earlier comment, I dont have to hit my brakes to kick up some badass smoke. My auto tranny does me well. My friends has a stick, i love to drive it in wide open spaces, but when i race or drive around the city, its auto all the way. Cant we just all get along
for christ's sake we got the same cars here. shouldnt we be making fun of f*rds and posting kills? LETS JUST ALL GET ALONG
for christ's sake we got the same cars here. shouldnt we be making fun of f*rds and posting kills? LETS JUST ALL GET ALONG Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 8, 2015 08:16 PM





