I have seen quite a few run high 13.x
lowest I have seen was a 93 R1 down in cali run a 13.6
bone stock


it can happen

 

13.6 best run, and thats all it is a "BEST RUN" which means "average everyday drivers" whom dont "drag race" for a living post higher times, obviously,
The 97 rx7 with higher power output than the few years older 260hp cars run very high 13's, or more likely low 14's if they can shift quickly without "messing up", and many "average drivers" do "mess up" frequently which is why there "average drivers" but when they do "mess up" then they lose an extra 1/2, 1, 2 or 3 whole seconds to recover from there mistake, therefore I believe the rx-7 did lose. And he did mention "a" turbo and from what everyone says the first turbo kicks in at 2200rpm and the second kicks in at 5500rpm, from the info we have, he only heard a single turbo kick in, so therefore the other guy didnt rev it high enough to kick in the second turbo, hence another "mistake" from an "average driver" not flooring it fast enough....
And afterall, SPEED IS NOTHING WITHOUT CONTROL

 

like you don't know there was a car in front of the 97 LT1:sillylol:

 

LOL :sillylol:

 

You have to be the stupidest ****er on this message board. You don't even know what year of car you raced so you make up bull**** about the year, then you expect ANYONE to believe that you actuall won? I'm sorry, but the TT RX-7 makes 260 horsepower in a car that weighs 2800 lbs. A single turbo model would be even more powerful, but somehow I doubt if you know how many turbos it had (seeing as how you make up year models that don't exist). Like the traditional idiot, you're just simply viewing part throttle toying from a superior car as a "race." An RX-7 would eat you for breakfast and return before noon for another snack. You're a ****ing moron!

 

you've got it all wrong it was on the back of a trailer on the way to the dealer!...duh.. :sillylol:

 

That doesn't count, damn and I thought I beat an SS Camaro.