LT1 intake swappers........
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
LT1 intake swappers........
Please tell us if you used the stock throttle body and post a close up picture of the linkage side if you can.
Seems there is a question about the linkage hitting the coolant fitting. I can't tell for sure, I have an aftermarket Accel 58mm TB.
Seems there is a question about the linkage hitting the coolant fitting. I can't tell for sure, I have an aftermarket Accel 58mm TB.
#2
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: Stock L98 with bolt ons.
Transmission: Stock rebuilt tranny with 2k stall and cooler.
Also Id like to see timeslip proven comparisons between the stock and LT1 manifolds with the only difference being the manifold if possible. Someone should surely have had a chance to fine tune things by now and get some numbers?? Anyone??
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Orygun
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ThirdGenZ28 92
Also Id like to see timeslip proven comparisons between the stock and LT1 manifolds with the only difference being the manifold if possible. Someone should surely have had a chance to fine tune things by now and get some numbers?? Anyone??
Also Id like to see timeslip proven comparisons between the stock and LT1 manifolds with the only difference being the manifold if possible. Someone should surely have had a chance to fine tune things by now and get some numbers?? Anyone??
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Warsaw, Indiana
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 427 LSX
Transmission: Turbo 400
I used the stock TB. I do not have pics yet. I had to very slightly clearance the TB pulley. Also, I plan to have mine running very soon and will attempt to run the car with the only change being the intake.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by GofasterFirebird
I used the stock TB. I do not have pics yet. I had to very slightly clearance the TB pulley. Also, I plan to have mine running very soon and will attempt to run the car with the only change being the intake.
I used the stock TB. I do not have pics yet. I had to very slightly clearance the TB pulley. Also, I plan to have mine running very soon and will attempt to run the car with the only change being the intake.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
OK, upon further research it looks like the problem might be limited to Corvette TB's with the bicycle "pulley" style throttle cable type.
Camaro's sem to only use the "singe point pivot" type cable.
Camaro's sem to only use the "singe point pivot" type cable.
#9
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: Stock L98 with bolt ons.
Transmission: Stock rebuilt tranny with 2k stall and cooler.
Originally posted by tpi_roc
How does this relate to johns post? Stop hijacking other peoples posts and go post your own if you have a question. Times have nothing to do with fitment.
How does this relate to johns post? Stop hijacking other peoples posts and go post your own if you have a question. Times have nothing to do with fitment.
#10
When my camaro was stock and had a TPI on it, it had the "bicycle" type pulley on it. I think it's more like... 89-up have the bycicle type pulley on it and 85-89 have the single point pivot style
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by Blackened
When my camaro was stock and had a TPI on it, it had the "bicycle" type pulley on it. I think it's more like... 89-up have the bycicle type pulley on it and 85-89 have the single point pivot style
When my camaro was stock and had a TPI on it, it had the "bicycle" type pulley on it. I think it's more like... 89-up have the bycicle type pulley on it and 85-89 have the single point pivot style
You guys/gals are awesome.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Panama City, FL, USA
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
which one do I need?
so which style do you need for the lt1 intake? I put my order in for john, but im ordering a after market throttle body. Which year should I tell them then. I have a 89, but I also have a 87 throttle cable sitting in my garage so the cable is no biggie I just need to know which year I should order it from.
#16
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Re: which one do I need?
Originally posted by 89Irocz23
so which style do you need for the lt1 intake? I put my order in for john, but im ordering a after market throttle body. Which year should I tell them then. I have a 89, but I also have a 87 throttle cable sitting in my garage so the cable is no biggie I just need to know which year I should order it from.
so which style do you need for the lt1 intake? I put my order in for john, but im ordering a after market throttle body. Which year should I tell them then. I have a 89, but I also have a 87 throttle cable sitting in my garage so the cable is no biggie I just need to know which year I should order it from.
I am still looking for pictures of completed LT1 intake swaps of the TB area.
#18
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by 89Irocz23
hey john are ya getting any of my e-mails? Jw hotmail has been acting up on my lately?
hey john are ya getting any of my e-mails? Jw hotmail has been acting up on my lately?
I did send a reply today.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Shelby Twp., Mi., USA
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '84 Fiero ('01 GA interior)
Engine: '96 4.0 Aurora
Transmission: '96 4T80E
The master asks for a picture, the master get two pictures:hail:
Mine is a stock '88 throttle body. I was concerned about clearance so I put the coolant line in the back. The second picture shows where the throttle is at WOT. In both pictures you can see where I plugged the original hole. No problems with the coolant yet, and it's been pretty warm. I also have the stock 305 single fan still on it
Mine is a stock '88 throttle body. I was concerned about clearance so I put the coolant line in the back. The second picture shows where the throttle is at WOT. In both pictures you can see where I plugged the original hole. No problems with the coolant yet, and it's been pretty warm. I also have the stock 305 single fan still on it
#20
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
You cheated RCR.
Anyway, I am having problems with '89+ TB hitting the coolant fitting. The '89 TB's changed the linkage style. Damn GM.
Anyway, I am having problems with '89+ TB hitting the coolant fitting. The '89 TB's changed the linkage style. Damn GM.
#21
Moderator/TGO Supporter
iTrader: (5)
What type of bracket is that??? I ordered one from a 93 lt1 camaro and it DOES NOT even come close to lookint like that. Also I am running the 87 style hrottle body and I have NO problems what so ever. I just rotated the 90 angle hose away from the intake to fit even better.
#22
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by AaronIROCZ
What type of bracket is that??? I ordered one from a 93 lt1 camaro and it DOES NOT even come close to lookint like that. Also I am running the 87 style hrottle body and I have NO problems what so ever. I just rotated the 90 angle hose away from the intake to fit even better.
What type of bracket is that??? I ordered one from a 93 lt1 camaro and it DOES NOT even come close to lookint like that. Also I am running the 87 style hrottle body and I have NO problems what so ever. I just rotated the 90 angle hose away from the intake to fit even better.
The reason your '87 TB fits so well is due to the linkage, they changed design in '89 and those people are having troubles.
#23
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
is there any internal difference between the older and newer style throttle bodies? I'm getting ready to mod my lt1 intake onto a 90 gta but I also have a spare 86 model tb. Also I wonder if it would hurt to drill and tap the pipe tap hole for the coolant fitting into the manifold at a slight angle, maybe 5 to 10 degrees?
#24
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by slayer2000
is there any internal difference between the older and newer style throttle bodies? I'm getting ready to mod my lt1 intake onto a 90 gta but I also have a spare 86 model tb. Also I wonder if it would hurt to drill and tap the pipe tap hole for the coolant fitting into the manifold at a slight angle, maybe 5 to 10 degrees?
is there any internal difference between the older and newer style throttle bodies? I'm getting ready to mod my lt1 intake onto a 90 gta but I also have a spare 86 model tb. Also I wonder if it would hurt to drill and tap the pipe tap hole for the coolant fitting into the manifold at a slight angle, maybe 5 to 10 degrees?
Yes, I could drill/tap the coolant fittings on the LT1 intake at a slight angle, think that would clear the late style TPI TB?
For what it's worth the LT1 TB clears the fittings no problem.
#25
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,731
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
The ports are a little different for the IAC, also the bores have thinner walls. We bore ours out to 52MM and the older style throttle bodies seem to have less matter to bore
-- Joe
-- Joe
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Warsaw, Indiana
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 427 LSX
Transmission: Turbo 400
John, I moved my drivers side coolant fitting back as far as it would go and still align with the coolant passage in the head. You can work the throttle and see how it get the close about 20 degrees of opening. So I clearanced there.
I modified my throttle bracket and I think it works very well. Plus, I didn't have to shorten my cable. Basically a .5 inch think spacer with a set screw to hold the plastic cable end. I found it at the local hardware store.
I modified my throttle bracket and I think it works very well. Plus, I didn't have to shorten my cable. Basically a .5 inch think spacer with a set screw to hold the plastic cable end. I found it at the local hardware store.
#27
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ask and ye shall get.. well.. something.
It's hard to tell from the pictures since the powdercoating makes it all look the same. This is my small block 400 I pulled from the Caprice to fix an issue with the rear seal..
But I'm using an 89+ TPI TB, with a 1994 LT1 IAC setup and I have LOTS of room. But note that I'm using AN10 fittings instead of pipe nipples.
Hope this is helpful.
It's hard to tell from the pictures since the powdercoating makes it all look the same. This is my small block 400 I pulled from the Caprice to fix an issue with the rear seal..
But I'm using an 89+ TPI TB, with a 1994 LT1 IAC setup and I have LOTS of room. But note that I'm using AN10 fittings instead of pipe nipples.
Hope this is helpful.
#28
Junior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Colonia,NJ
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 Firebird Formula
John what about a Throttlebody Spacer. Go to www.airaid.com they have one for a Vette up to 1992.Its for the stock TB,the thickness of the spacer is 1 inch.Maybe that would help. If this is a possible maybe the holes can be opened up at a machine shop to match the openings for the 58MM TB.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: the garage
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 SVO
Engine: Volvo headed 2.3T
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 8.8" 3.73
Originally posted by Formula383
John what about a Throttlebody Spacer. Go to www.airaid.com they have one for a Vette up to 1992.Its for the stock TB,the thickness of the spacer is 1 inch.Maybe that would help. If this is a possible maybe the holes can be opened up at a machine shop to match the openings for the 58MM TB.
John what about a Throttlebody Spacer. Go to www.airaid.com they have one for a Vette up to 1992.Its for the stock TB,the thickness of the spacer is 1 inch.Maybe that would help. If this is a possible maybe the holes can be opened up at a machine shop to match the openings for the 58MM TB.
On a side note, John are you considering selling the angled adapter seperatly? cheers, Bob
#31
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
hey RCR, could you post a pic of how you ran the coolant lines? I think running them from the back of the intake would be a lot cleaner looking. Also to john I was wondering is the distributor spacer bolted on or do you just have to silicon where it touches the manifold then use a regular gasket on the other side?
#32
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
The distributor spacer is screwed down and RTV sealed.
I don't sell the angled spacer seperately.
I don't sell the angled spacer seperately.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Shelby Twp., Mi., USA
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '84 Fiero ('01 GA interior)
Engine: '96 4.0 Aurora
Transmission: '96 4T80E
Slayer:
I don't really have a clear pic, but this one might help with an explanation:
As seen from my above pics, I blocked the coolant passage under the throttle cable. I used the passage at the back of the head. This line runs to the remote thermostat at the bottom right of this picture. Right next to that line on the same side of the thermostat housing is the temperature sensor. I flipped the divertor valve upside down so the coolant line ran towards the fender. You can see the bottom of the divertor next to my oil dipstick. I ran that line and the second line from the head (in front) together around the back of the fan shroud. You can see both lines in front of my air filter. They loop down under the main coolant hose to the front of the thermostat housing.
I hope that helps.
I don't really have a clear pic, but this one might help with an explanation:
As seen from my above pics, I blocked the coolant passage under the throttle cable. I used the passage at the back of the head. This line runs to the remote thermostat at the bottom right of this picture. Right next to that line on the same side of the thermostat housing is the temperature sensor. I flipped the divertor valve upside down so the coolant line ran towards the fender. You can see the bottom of the divertor next to my oil dipstick. I ran that line and the second line from the head (in front) together around the back of the fan shroud. You can see both lines in front of my air filter. They loop down under the main coolant hose to the front of the thermostat housing.
I hope that helps.
#34
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
thanks rcr, I was thinking about trying to run both lines from the back but I thought some one mentioned overheating problems with that setup. Have you had any trouble with yours?
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Orygun
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by RCR
The master asks for a picture, the master get two pictures:hail:
Mine is a stock '88 throttle body. I was concerned about clearance so I put the coolant line in the back. The second picture shows where the throttle is at WOT. In both pictures you can see where I plugged the original hole. No problems with the coolant yet, and it's been pretty warm. I also have the stock 305 single fan still on it
The master asks for a picture, the master get two pictures:hail:
Mine is a stock '88 throttle body. I was concerned about clearance so I put the coolant line in the back. The second picture shows where the throttle is at WOT. In both pictures you can see where I plugged the original hole. No problems with the coolant yet, and it's been pretty warm. I also have the stock 305 single fan still on it
#36
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: kentucky
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: manual/t56
I was talking about running both lines from the back. I read RCRs comments but from what I saw he's only running one line. I just wonder if I were to run both lines from the back if that might cause a local overheating problem with the front 2 cylinders?
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Shelby Twp., Mi., USA
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '84 Fiero ('01 GA interior)
Engine: '96 4.0 Aurora
Transmission: '96 4T80E
Honestly, I don't know enough about how the coolant system works to say whether having the two lines in the back will hurt you. I was told having one in the back would screw things up, but so far so good. I don't have hard numbers, but in stop and go traffic with 90+* temps, my car was at 221* yesterday, which might be a little lower than last year before the swap. I don't know if it's better, but I keep a close eye on the gauge. Someday I'll get a dual fan.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Running the lines from the back will not hurt anything. In fact it
will help keep the engine cooler. The back of the block runs hotter
than the front during normal operation. There is not much water
circulation going on back there. Convection is relied on to carry
away the heat. So drawing from the back would be a good thing.
That is what I am planning to do.
will help keep the engine cooler. The back of the block runs hotter
than the front during normal operation. There is not much water
circulation going on back there. Convection is relied on to carry
away the heat. So drawing from the back would be a good thing.
That is what I am planning to do.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.3 Gen III SBC
Transmission: 4L80E NTC 258mm Stall
Axle/Gears: Trick Chassis 9" 3.50 S-Strac
I just received my LT1 intake today. And put my 91 throttle body on, There is definately contact that would prevent ANY throttle movement when bolted down. I think it is fixable with a cut off tool, and five minutes. But the Intake looks great, Thanks John.
I will see If I can get some pics with my friends digital camera. It looks that if the nipple was 3/4 of and inch shorter that It would clear. (with out the hose)
I will go by NAPA towmorrow and pick up a couple 90degree hoses.
I will see If I can get some pics with my friends digital camera. It looks that if the nipple was 3/4 of and inch shorter that It would clear. (with out the hose)
I will go by NAPA towmorrow and pick up a couple 90degree hoses.
Last edited by Chris Etemadi; 06-28-2002 at 12:54 AM.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hard hittin' New Britain, CT USA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Hello everybody. Sorry for the several month hiatus but I'm back again. Here are two pics from my install I posted awhile ago back in January. I have the 85-87 style setup and could not clear the coolant lines in the manifold. It hit at about 1/2 throttle. Luckily I use a NOS plate which basically saved my ***. Since I have a V-belt setup I did not have to worry about clearing the tensioner. I did have to hack the alternator bracket though. The first pic shows the linkage without the plate and the second shows the plate.
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: LS1 / LS3
Transmission: M6 / M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27
Hmm, I see an interesing plate between the TB and intake
Would it not be easier to use a 90 deg. fitting and route the hose from the front?
Would it not be easier to use a 90 deg. fitting and route the hose from the front?
#44
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by Blackened
Yeah and I think one of his manifold hold down bolts is half way screwed in !
Yeah and I think one of his manifold hold down bolts is half way screwed in !
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hard hittin' New Britain, CT USA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
I explained the plate in my post. The plate was easier to use since I already used it anyway. I have since replaced those old bolts whith smaller allen head bolts that go all the way down.
#48
I realize I'm bringing this post back from the dead ... but I have a question abou the Corvette fuel rail covers in the above post. It looks like they can't be used because the throttle cable would be in the way. Is that true ?
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hard hittin' New Britain, CT USA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
To use the fuel rail covers some rigging is required. I had to cut some pieces off of both sides to make them fit properly. But that was needed to clear the fuel lines and such. My throttle cable isn't in the right place either. I'm in the process of creating a bracket for my setup. I don't know about the other guys but my cable didn't fit into a 93 bracket. My fuel rail covers do fit, but hacking either way was required. As for the throttle cable, I have enough clearance for it to use the covers even with the way I have it now.
#50
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by Iroc n roll
To use the fuel rail covers some rigging is required. I had to cut some pieces off of both sides to make them fit properly. But that was needed to clear the fuel lines and such. My throttle cable isn't in the right place either. I'm in the process of creating a bracket for my setup. I don't know about the other guys but my cable didn't fit into a 93 bracket. My fuel rail covers do fit, but hacking either way was required. As for the throttle cable, I have enough clearance for it to use the covers even with the way I have it now.
To use the fuel rail covers some rigging is required. I had to cut some pieces off of both sides to make them fit properly. But that was needed to clear the fuel lines and such. My throttle cable isn't in the right place either. I'm in the process of creating a bracket for my setup. I don't know about the other guys but my cable didn't fit into a 93 bracket. My fuel rail covers do fit, but hacking either way was required. As for the throttle cable, I have enough clearance for it to use the covers even with the way I have it now.
http://www.lt1intake.com/update.htm