TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Valve cover breathers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2003 | 09:09 PM
  #1  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
Valve cover breathers

I'd like to install one of these on my car. Can anyone recommend me a nice, not-so-expensive brand I can go with that screws in? I was gonna get the cheap Pep Boys breathers they have but those are push-in and I've heard these have a tendency to blow out. thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 05:50 PM
  #2  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
if you have stock valve covers , pep boys sells one that fits in place of the oil filler cap, so it twists in the same way. It is made by Spectre, if i can ill get u a part # for it .
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 07:04 PM
  #3  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
I do have stock valve covers but my cap screws in instead of just twisting, so I don't think that cap would work.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 07:18 PM
  #4  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
thats strange , do u have a pic of it? theres gotta be something that will work
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 07:29 PM
  #5  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
No pic sorry. I really need a digital cam. But in the covers I have, the oil filler cap is closest to the alternator and requires several turns to fully close. I know in earlier models the cap is towards the back, and IIRC from an 88 I owned, that one just twists closed with only like half a turn.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 09:48 PM
  #6  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Why do you want a valve cover breather?????Any valid reason why you need one??

Last edited by Z28DJP1987; Feb 17, 2003 at 08:08 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #7  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Z28DJP1987
Why do you want a vavle cover breather?????Any valid reason why you need one??
Just for better ventilation, and I like the way the ones with the exposed filter material look.

Yes, I know it won't do a thing as far as improving performance.

I guess of all the modded engines in here, no one has installed this type of breather??

Last edited by llvll4l2c91350; Feb 16, 2003 at 10:03 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 10:03 PM
  #8  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
I thought that was your idea to look....
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 10:20 PM
  #9  
SMURFN' Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
From: Lakewood, CO
Car: 1994 Jeep Wrangler
i remember vader saying a while ago that on a TPI car a breather would do nothing but make you engine bay dirty.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2003 | 10:39 PM
  #10  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
doesnt the pvc valve work kinda like a breather?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 08:22 AM
  #11  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Dumb answer Md, because the PCV valve does not look as a Chrome Breather. Its the LOOK!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 02:51 PM
  #12  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
Originally posted by SMURFN' Z28
i remember vader saying a while ago that on a TPI car a breather would do nothing but make you engine bay dirty.
My breathers havent made my engine dirty so far, (you cant see it in the pic but there is also one on the driverside)

Matt
Attached Thumbnails Valve cover breathers-engine.jpg  

Last edited by Fastcamaro87; Feb 17, 2003 at 02:53 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 03:36 PM
  #13  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Good looking breathers What have they done for you performance wise?????
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #14  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
as for performance i dont know what anyone could expect to acheive as far as that is concerned. I just did it because i liked the way it looked.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 03:55 PM
  #15  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Originally posted by Fastcamaro87
as for performance i dont know what anyone could expect to acheive as far as that is concerned. I just did it because i liked the way it looked.
I rest my case about how useful valve cover breathers are, just for LOOKS.:hail: :hail:

:lala: LOOKS:lala:

Sorry about that Fastcamaro87, I coulnt resist,,,,
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2003 | 04:01 PM
  #16  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
no prob,

like i said i dont know what people would actually expect a filter element mounted to a valve cover to do.

on a race car they probably serve a purpose but i honestly dont know what the benefits would be.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 10:16 AM
  #17  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
I've never had my push-in breather come out. Just make sure that you keep your PCV hooked up. The first time I installed a breather in both valve covers and didn't use a PCV valve. 10k miles later I had to yank the motor to replace EVERY gasket.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 03:55 PM
  #18  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
Jim,
Why did u have to replace the gaskets? how did not having the PCV valve mess everything up?

I have the breathers that replace the oil cap, so they twist in, I got my hands on another driver side valve cover so i could use the breathers on both sides and still have my pcv system running the same way. So i dont think i should have any problems, but I am interested in what happened to your motor.

TIA
Matt
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #19  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Fastcamaro87
What did you do with the 90 deg tube and hose to the TPI intake
on the rear passenger valve cover??? When I installed my new engine and put new valve covers on, this 90 deg tube was cracked and I had a pretty good oil leak from it. That oil was going somewhere. Just a thought.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 04:34 PM
  #20  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
ok the peice you are reffering to was a goofy design to begin with and i wanted to get rid of it because of the potential oil leaks etc. so heres what i did, first i removed the TB and pulled the hose nipple out of it ( the one that goes to the passenger side valve cover) a pair of pliers is all you need to yank it out, then i tapped the hole for a 1/4 inch pipe thread, and screwed a 1/4 inch pipe thread fitting with a 3/8`s hose nipple on it. now i was able to use a length of 3/8s hose to run from the TB to the valve cover (now for the next problem, u need some kind of fitting to hook the hose to and the original peice is to big for the 3/8s hose , so i went to the store and got a pcv valve and grommet for the driverside cover, then i cut the bottom off the pcv valve so now it is just a press in 3/8s hose nipple, put the grommet and valve in the valve cover and hooked up the hose.
No problems so far and it works great.

if you have any more questions let me know and ill try to be a little more descriptive .

Matt
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2003 | 09:25 PM
  #21  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
what is the part number for that breather? i really wana get one... i hate that stupid lookin thing... how big is that hole? im lookin for someting like that.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 07:26 AM
  #22  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Originally posted by Fastcamaro87
Jim,
Why did u have to replace the gaskets? how did not having the PCV valve mess everything up?

I have the breathers that replace the oil cap, so they twist in, I got my hands on another driver side valve cover so i could use the breathers on both sides and still have my pcv system running the same way. So i dont think i should have any problems, but I am interested in what happened to your motor.

TIA
Matt
I had to replace all of my gaskets because I had too much crankcase pressure, which caused all of my gaskets to leak. I had to replace the rear main seal, timing chain gasket, oil pan gasket and valve cover gaskets. The only gasket that survived was my fuel pump block-off gasket. Granted I was stupid and used cork gaskets, but they still should have gone more than 10k miles.

Anyway, I wouldn't run a breather on the same side as your PCV valve. That will pretty much eliminate any benefit that the PCV valve has. It'll just suck air from the breather and can still cause pressures to remain elsewhere within the engine.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 01:42 PM
  #23  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
I decided not to get it. I used the money to help me pay for some brake dust shields instead. Had to special order them cuz no one seems to have 16" sets. Anyways I'm gonna paint 'em red and install 'em as soon as I get a chance.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 01:51 PM
  #24  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
thanks for the heads up Jim, i think i will remove the one on the driverside.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 03:08 PM
  #25  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
I think the one you blocked off on the rear passenger side
is more important. My Opinion
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 03:10 PM
  #26  
Ed Maher's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 10
From: Manassas VA
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
Besides keeping crankcase pressure in check, PCV also helps to keep your oil fresh and clean. By actively pulling out combustion vapors, as well as boiled off water condensation you will have that much less of that crap in your oil.

Another thing to note, putting a push in breather to replace the TB tube on a MAF car is effectively creating a vacuum leak since there is now a pather for unmetered air into the engine. Sometimes it doesn't matter, sometimes it causes all kinds of weird problems.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 03:23 PM
  #27  
Jim85IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Edit: nevermind.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 03:43 PM
  #28  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
ok i think u misunderstood what i did, i didnt eliminate anything, i just replaced it with a better design, so the line that goes from the TB to the valve cover is still there (its just a peice of 3/8s hose now instead of that goofy plastic pipes and grommets all hooked together), and the pcv valve is still there, everything is in the factory location, except now there is a breather on each valve cover, I understand what you are saying about the vacuum leaks, maybe i will just put it back to stock, since from what you guys are telling me it seems like there are no real benefits to having these, and it actually may hurt the performance of my car (i.e. vacuum leaks, moisture accumulation etc,)

thanks for the info, this may actually solve a high idle problem i have been trying to figure out.

matt
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 06:07 PM
  #29  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Z28DJP1987

What does your car LOOK like?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 06:22 PM
  #30  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Abubaca
For your info: And now deleted.

Last edited by Z28DJP1987; Feb 20, 2003 at 07:23 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 06:26 PM
  #31  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Abubaca
::hail:

Last edited by Z28DJP1987; Feb 20, 2003 at 07:21 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2003 | 10:44 PM
  #32  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Looks nice.

It just seemed like you were picking on him because he wanted something for looks.

-and we've ALL done things that help our cars look nice.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 07:29 AM
  #33  
Z28DJP1987's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, USA
Originally posted by Abubaca
Looks nice.

It just seemed like you were picking on him because he wanted something for looks.

-and we've ALL done things that help our cars look nice.
YES, Anyone can add anything for looks. But remove the PCV just for a Vavle Cover Breather so it looks good, I still say its not the best idea.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #34  
Fastcamaro87's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
From: pgh,pa,
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
The first time I installed a breather in both valve covers and didn't use a PCV valve. 10k miles later I had to yank the motor to replace EVERY gasket.
"YES, Anyone can add anything for looks. But remove the PCV just for a Vavle Cover Breather so it looks good, I still say its not the best idea."
FYI,
Jim was the only one who ran breathers without the PCV valve, mine was always still there.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2003 | 12:23 PM
  #35  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
If you do run breathers you can do away with your PCV valve since it won't work anymore. Heres some info I posted in a earlier post on another section of the board.

As for the PCV I actually did a little reading on that yesturday out of my Demon Carb book. PCV is used to release pressure that builds up from the pistons. They say if you don't run a PCV or Breather it can build up enough pressure in the oil pan to blow out a seal or the pan gasket. They also went into the detail between the two designs. PCV does great job of pulling pressure out except at WOT. At WOT the book said the motor doesn't have enough vacuum to properly open the valve, so pressure can build. They continued on and said that it wasn't a big problem on street cars since they don't see WOT for extended amounts of time, but it would be a problem for a race car since they run WOT for extended amounts of time. They also said breathers were against local and federal laws on emission controlled cars (not that big of deal really we run them all the time on street here in IL).
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 08:17 AM
  #36  
Hasselhof's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Denmark/Indiana
Car: 1988 Trans AM Gta
Engine: 6.0 Liter TPI
Transmission: TH700r4
Very informative...I was thinking of removing my PCV..just for the uncluddering effect ....

I have read up on the WOT and no pcv problem....Summit and JEGs sells crankcase vaccum booster pumps..for engines that runn extensively under wot conditions


thanks for a great forum


Regards

Thomas
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 09:30 AM
  #37  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,659
Likes: 310
You can get away with a breather-type oil filler cap on a speed-density TPI, but not a MAF TPI. Since the PCV air is part of the intake air calculation, it MUST be measured by the MAF. That's why there is a CCV breather tube from the TB to the rocker cover in the first place. All that CCV air already comes through the MAF and intake tract. Without it, you're just begging for a code '34'.

A S/D scheme doesn't need that air mass measurement, but there are no practical advantages to changing from CCV tube to the breather cover.

Aftermarket covers that don't provide a CCV tube opening will require some creative solutions, and a breather cap is an option for S/D. You may experience some backflow on hard acceleration or with worn rings/bores, and will have to deal with the mess created. If you have an emissions requirement and inspection, an astute visual inspector may fail you on a breather cap instead of a closed CCV system. If you install aftermarket covers on a MAF system, you have little choice but to plumb a vent line to the throttle body, or burn a different EPROM.

Of course, you could run without a PCV system, but that's just asking for trouble. If you like weekly oil changes, that's fine. If oil leaks aren't a problem for you, good. If varnish buildup in your engine doesn't bother you, good - take off the PCV valve.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2003 | 12:26 PM
  #38  
fireturd350's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Excellent point. I never even thought about that on a MAF, since I have a SD system.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
Nick McCardle
Firebirds for Sale
1
Sep 10, 2015 08:36 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 07:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.