Straight answer on FMS injector fuel pressure setting
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Straight answer on FMS injector fuel pressure setting
I've been searching quite a bit on the boards lately, trying to find a decent answer regarding what a good fuel pressure setting would be for a stock L98 setup and some 24# SVO injectors. Even better would be a general formula or ratio for what the SVO injectors flow given a certain fuel pressure. So far all I've found are some general wishy washy answers that don't really come to any conclusion. Numbers from 37 to 46 have been thrown out there, and I've heard one person say some SVO injector at TPI fuel pressures will flow like a Bosch 26# injector will. I can't remember the specific rating that was for. Anyway, I know that I need to reprogram my PROM for the new injectors for them to really fix this issue, but until then I wanted to band-aid it by dropping my pressure. I was thinking that 30 to 35 PSI was a decent range from the generalities I've gathered, so that's where I'll start the "bidding." Anyone have some other input from close experience with the same issue?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 10
From: Manassas VA
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
new flow/old flow = sqrt( (new pressure)^2/(old pressure)^2)
simple as that. Off the top of my head i don't rememeber what SVOs are rated at, definitely either 39.5 or 37.5 psi. GM is rated at 43.5.
simple as that. Off the top of my head i don't rememeber what SVOs are rated at, definitely either 39.5 or 37.5 psi. GM is rated at 43.5.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 2
From: Fla
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Why not just try running the pressure up and down and find out what works best for your car? IM not trying to be a jerk... just seems like the best way to do it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 4
From: Mims, Florida
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
Ed,
Your equation is correct if you do not include the 2s.
Squaring the numerator and squaring the denumenator, then taking the square root of the whole thing is same as doing nothing.
New fuel flow rate = sqrt(new pres/old pres) * old fuel flow rate
I believe that what I have above is correct.
Your equation is correct if you do not include the 2s.
Squaring the numerator and squaring the denumenator, then taking the square root of the whole thing is same as doing nothing.
New fuel flow rate = sqrt(new pres/old pres) * old fuel flow rate
I believe that what I have above is correct.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
If they are rated at 39.5psi then you should start at about 34psi to get 22#/hr, if they are rated at 43.5 psi then you should start at 37psi.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car: '91 Formula
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Thanks for the help guys. I think I'll just set it at about 35PSI and see how that goes for starters. And I am planning on burning my own PROM for it, but I just don't have the equipment or software for it yet, and don't have the money for it yet, so this is just an easy fix until I can work it better.
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, Kansas
Car: 88 ext.longbed 1/2 ton
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: Slushbox 400
This is probably no help but, here it is anyway.
http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tableifc.htm
http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tableifc.htm
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
no ford and chevy injectors as well as doge and some other "bosch style" are all rated at the same PSI. If there is any difference it would be like going from 22# GM to 24# ford, but that is just the difference between 22# and 24# not the difference between ford and GM. see this post on the subject. https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=120342
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
no ford and chevy injectors as well as doge and some other "bosch style" are all rated at the same PSI. If there is any difference it would be like going from 22# GM to 24# ford, but that is just the difference between 22# and 24# not the difference between ford and GM. see this post on the subject. https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=120342
no ford and chevy injectors as well as doge and some other "bosch style" are all rated at the same PSI. If there is any difference it would be like going from 22# GM to 24# ford, but that is just the difference between 22# and 24# not the difference between ford and GM. see this post on the subject. https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=120342
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I got it straight from the flow bench man
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
I got it straight from the flow bench man
I got it straight from the flow bench man
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
yeah thats it just like in my link its the SAE standard.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Hmmn, interesting. I had some email conversation with Rich at cruzin performance.
The info I gleaned was Ford injectors are rated at 36.5psi??, and GM at 43.5psi.
Rich is "The Man", IMO.
Regardless of SAE spec's, that's only useful to compare things equally...i/e I've seen new injectors for GM cars, new injectors for Ford cars, and new Accel injectors (all in the box) and nothing came with them specifying the rated flow was at any industry standard.
That said, only real way to know would be to measure flow on the FMS injectors and GM injectors at the same SAE Standard, and compare the results.
Doeas anyone know who has done this?
The info I gleaned was Ford injectors are rated at 36.5psi??, and GM at 43.5psi.
Rich is "The Man", IMO.
Regardless of SAE spec's, that's only useful to compare things equally...i/e I've seen new injectors for GM cars, new injectors for Ford cars, and new Accel injectors (all in the box) and nothing came with them specifying the rated flow was at any industry standard.
That said, only real way to know would be to measure flow on the FMS injectors and GM injectors at the same SAE Standard, and compare the results.
Doeas anyone know who has done this?
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I know you guys all love him but what I saw is what I saw and what I saw was a a couple of 19# chevy a couple of 19# ford and a couple of 19# dodge injectors all on the flow rig they were all untouched (just clean) and flowed within a few grams per second of each other. and all were flowing 19# at the same rail pressure.
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: End of the earth
Car: 88 GTA Notchback
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
So, if what you are saying is true, then there are several hundred people on this forum alone that have installed the SVO injectors and after doing so have had to lower their fuel pressure or change their injector constant so they didn't run too rich and by your information they shouldn't have had to. I'm sorry, but I don't buy it. There are way too many people with real world experiences that prove that the injectors flow at different rates.
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by 88blackgta
I'm sorry, but I don't buy it.
I'm sorry, but I don't buy it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
You don't have to take what he is saying personally, the guy is just skeptical. And from what he is seeing, he is finding it hard to believe the info you are putting out.
If you were to have, like say.... annotated pictures or printouts to back up what you claim, it would be a lot easier to understand and have faith in. But earlier you stated that they are all rated with the same rail pressure, but you didn't know the ambient rail pressure that is the actual standard. Things like that foster doubt. I truthfully don't know for sure if you are correct either and as much as I believe you are a competent individual and a man of your word from previous conversations with you, there are waaaayyy too many self-proclaimed experts on the net these days and it behooves oneself to be skeptical
. Raw data would do wonders for the doubtful
.
I have the 30# SVOs on my 355 right now and did the math for a 43.5psi GM rail pressure and a 39.5psi rail pressure for the FMS injectors to come up with 33# for my injector constant. I then proceeded to fine tune the rest of the calibration from there and my engine combination isn't all that stock so it is difficult to say if that converted injector constant is appropriate or not. But I can say that I didn't have to make whole-sale changes to the VE tables in principle, so maybe that figure is pretty close.... But the numbers are close and there are plenty of other variables, so I really don't have anything concrete enough to weigh in on this with any kind of confidence
.........
If you were to have, like say.... annotated pictures or printouts to back up what you claim, it would be a lot easier to understand and have faith in. But earlier you stated that they are all rated with the same rail pressure, but you didn't know the ambient rail pressure that is the actual standard. Things like that foster doubt. I truthfully don't know for sure if you are correct either and as much as I believe you are a competent individual and a man of your word from previous conversations with you, there are waaaayyy too many self-proclaimed experts on the net these days and it behooves oneself to be skeptical
. Raw data would do wonders for the doubtful
.I have the 30# SVOs on my 355 right now and did the math for a 43.5psi GM rail pressure and a 39.5psi rail pressure for the FMS injectors to come up with 33# for my injector constant. I then proceeded to fine tune the rest of the calibration from there and my engine combination isn't all that stock so it is difficult to say if that converted injector constant is appropriate or not. But I can say that I didn't have to make whole-sale changes to the VE tables in principle, so maybe that figure is pretty close.... But the numbers are close and there are plenty of other variables, so I really don't have anything concrete enough to weigh in on this with any kind of confidence
......... Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9192camaro
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Feb 3, 2019 12:21 AM
92camaroJoe
Tech / General Engine
6
Aug 13, 2015 06:07 AM





