TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

HP gain with TPIS ported base and 1.6's or 1.52's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 25, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
1991 RS 305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 386
Likes: 2
From: Blaine, MN
HP gain with TPIS ported base and 1.6's or 1.52's?

1985 TPI 305, mods in sig. I'm porting & installing a TPIS base. Cam is non-peanut .403/.415 lift. To enhance the effect of the ported TPIS base, would it pay to go Comp Cam 1.6 roller tips? These would yield .430/443 lift. Or would 1.52 roller tips work as well, or just stay stock? Some say 1.6 will increase guide wear, some say the total lift is within reality, and its a non-factor. How much HP gain can I REALISTICALLY expect from this combo, separetely and combined? Comments?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 01:29 AM
  #2  
Morley's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 2
TPIS bigmouth base? You'd need larger runners to go along with that and the plenum. Not to mention you'd need headers to expell all of that burned air/fuel mixture.
The gutted cat may actually be hurting your performance (this has been explained here before) and I don't now if the lil ole 305 can really make use of all that extra flow (but an increase over stock will help)
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 01:35 AM
  #3  
D Stroy H8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Go with the 1.6s

On an offshoot, I wouldn't siamese the bigmouth base, as it should be great out of the box for a 305. You could lose more torque than the hp gained.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
1991 RS 305's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 386
Likes: 2
From: Blaine, MN
I'm not siamesing the base, just removing the "step" at the runner entries, and generally cleaning up any flash and smoothing things out. The runners are the least restrictive component of the TPI system, especially for a 305. The base is the bottleneck, since the stock heads will outflow the base. The plenuum is ported. The T-Body is the stock 48mm with airfoil, which is fine. As for exhaust, I want to keep stock appearence, and have opened it up as much as possible short of headers. As for gutted cats, it "might" not flow as well as a straight pipe, but it flows at least as well as any cat, and would pass a "visual" inspection if need be. Plus it sounds better. When its all said & done, I'll again scanner-tune the A/F for 13.1 at WOT, like I have it now. FWIW, my fuel pressure is down to 38 lbs from 43 lbs stock. So much for adding more fuel pressure to go faster, not always the ticket. My concern for the 1.6's is valve guide wear vs the 1.52's, although I'd go 1.6's if safely possible. What are others experience with this?

Last edited by 1991 RS 305; Oct 26, 2003 at 08:57 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2003 | 09:21 AM
  #5  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Assuming trading stamped rockers for stamped, the increase (if any) in wear would be minimal.

Going to a roller tip or full roller, should be less wear, as the "tip" would then roll across the valve, instead of slide.

All that said, isn't the increased "load" on the rocker on the pushrod side anyway? So then the only real difference in that the valve will go "down" further in the guide.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Aug 20, 2015 09:36 PM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.