383 Heads: AFR 195 vs. Pro Topline 200CC
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: GM T56
383 Heads: AFR 195 vs. Pro Topline 200CC
The AFR's are $400 more than the Pro Toplines. How much of a difference will this make on a 383 TPI? I'm not worried too much about the weight issue (i.e. Aluminum vs Iron) but in how they flow. Will this also alter cam selection? I've already got a cam picked out if I go with AFR's (XR276). Would it work well with P/T's too? I'll be running a heavily ported TPI setup unless I can find a way to make the Stealth Ram street legal.
-Rippin
-Rippin
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
i did some excel spreadsheets on those 2 heads. the AFR had better overall flow. but can't beat the price on the pro-topline heads. but i went with the dart pro1 200cc aluminum heads anyway.
side note: the HSR is "street" legal. just not "emissions" legal.
here's what my setup will be. here's what my setup will be.
side note: the HSR is "street" legal. just not "emissions" legal.
here's what my setup will be. here's what my setup will be.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: GM T56
Originally posted by mrr23
i did some excel spreadsheets on those 2 heads. the AFR had better overall flow. but can't beat the price on the pro-topline heads. but i went with the dart pro1 200cc aluminum heads anyway.
side note: the HSR is "street" legal. just not "emissions" legal.
[/URL]
i did some excel spreadsheets on those 2 heads. the AFR had better overall flow. but can't beat the price on the pro-topline heads. but i went with the dart pro1 200cc aluminum heads anyway.
side note: the HSR is "street" legal. just not "emissions" legal.
[/URL]
Anyone have any info about the cam I was talking about? Such as how it will run in a 383 w/ Pro Topline
-Rippin
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
i'm using SRP 16cc dished pistons with 64cc heads. puts me at 9.8:1 the cam you picked has a lsa of 110* while this should net at least 15" of vacuum, you're pushing it. i would use the xm276hr (112* lsa)or the nx276hr (113* lsa) to ensure enough vacuum so the computer doesn't 'freak out'.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Cool thing about aluminum heads though is they get rid of heat a lot quicker than cast so you can run more compression. I'm planning on running near 11:1 with 93 octane.
Originally posted by fireturd350
Cool thing about aluminum heads though is they get rid of heat a lot quicker than cast so you can run more compression. I'm planning on running near 11:1 with 93 octane.
Cool thing about aluminum heads though is they get rid of heat a lot quicker than cast so you can run more compression. I'm planning on running near 11:1 with 93 octane.
I know you said you do not care about weight savings but it makes you faster ... 70 lbs is alot.
Also the Long runner as well as the HSR will like the smaller runner size much better. You may even want to go with the 190 AFR..
Another thing you want to look at is the AFR's flow really good exhaust and great mid lift flow.
Can you tell I love my AFR's?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 7
From: New Boston, IL, USA
Car: '90 Formula 350
Engine: 383 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt S/S 700-R4 & ACT 9" Stall
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.23
Yep, I've seen carb motors go up to 12:1 with 93 octane... I wouldn't recommend it I'm willing to bet it was a bitch to tune.
Rule of thumb you can run 1 more Compression point over Cast when using Aluminum heads at the same octane. Tests have shown 1 compression point is worth 30 hp (Hot Rod or Car Craft did a dyno test on it).
My 210cc RR AFR heads cost me 1550 to my door. They said 1475 in the catalog, so you're not looking at much of a mark up over that considering the shipping weight of the heads.
Rule of thumb you can run 1 more Compression point over Cast when using Aluminum heads at the same octane. Tests have shown 1 compression point is worth 30 hp (Hot Rod or Car Craft did a dyno test on it).
My 210cc RR AFR heads cost me 1550 to my door. They said 1475 in the catalog, so you're not looking at much of a mark up over that considering the shipping weight of the heads.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: GM T56
Originally posted by 87_TA
I know you said you do not care about weight savings but it makes you faster ... 70 lbs is alot.
I know you said you do not care about weight savings but it makes you faster ... 70 lbs is alot.
I didn't know it was a 70lb difference! Holy crap. mrr23: I haven't looked up the specs yet, but do those cams have the same specs as the XR276, just different LSA?
Any ideas of rwhp/tq with a 383, Pro Toplines, XM276HR? I like your compression ratio, so maybe you're same setup as far as head CC and pistons.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
Originally posted by Rippin92RS
I didn't know it was a 70lb difference! Holy crap.
mrr23: I haven't looked up the specs yet, but do those cams have the same specs as the XR276, just different LSA?
Any ideas of rwhp/tq with a 383, Pro Toplines, XM276HR? I like your compression ratio, so maybe you're same setup as far as head CC and pistons.
I didn't know it was a 70lb difference! Holy crap. mrr23: I haven't looked up the specs yet, but do those cams have the same specs as the XR276, just different LSA?
Any ideas of rwhp/tq with a 383, Pro Toplines, XM276HR? I like your compression ratio, so maybe you're same setup as far as head CC and pistons.
but look what happens when i go from the 07-305-8 to the 07-306-8 (230/244 @ .050 .510/.540 with 1.5 rockers):
HP http://stealthram.com/dyno/305306comparehp.gif
TQ http://stealthram.com/dyno/305306comparetq.gif
lots of loss under 4500 rpm. but the larger cam picks up above 4500. so, pick your rpm you want to use.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Don't forget about Brodix!
Also, don't worry about vacuum at idle... Low vacuum at idle can easily be tuned around (with SD at least). It will limit your brake boost and whatnot just like a carbed application with low vacuum though....
Also, don't worry about vacuum at idle... Low vacuum at idle can easily be tuned around (with SD at least). It will limit your brake boost and whatnot just like a carbed application with low vacuum though....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: NC
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: GM T56
Originally posted by mrr23
yes all the same except LSA. i'll be using the comp cams 07-305-8 (220/230 @ .050 .510/.510 --adding 1.6 rockers brings it to .544/.544) according to DD2003 441hp @ 5500 and 457tq @ 4500. but we'll see once it's on the dyno in feb '04.
but look what happens when i go from the 07-305-8 to the 07-306-8 (230/244 @ .050 .510/.540 with 1.5 rockers):
HP http://stealthram.com/dyno/305306comparehp.gif
TQ http://stealthram.com/dyno/305306comparetq.gif
lots of loss under 4500 rpm. but the larger cam picks up above 4500. so, pick your rpm you want to use.
yes all the same except LSA. i'll be using the comp cams 07-305-8 (220/230 @ .050 .510/.510 --adding 1.6 rockers brings it to .544/.544) according to DD2003 441hp @ 5500 and 457tq @ 4500. but we'll see once it's on the dyno in feb '04.
but look what happens when i go from the 07-305-8 to the 07-306-8 (230/244 @ .050 .510/.540 with 1.5 rockers):
HP http://stealthram.com/dyno/305306comparehp.gif
TQ http://stealthram.com/dyno/305306comparetq.gif
lots of loss under 4500 rpm. but the larger cam picks up above 4500. so, pick your rpm you want to use.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
yes they will flow close. with the exception that i'll be using 2.055 intake valve. if you go with the 306 cam, make sure you gear the car accordingly. at least a 4 series gear (4.11, 4.56, etc.) but my question is why turn so much RPM when you can make the same power lower? this cam was in my friends 383 (which i'm buying). he shifted at 6200. and the 306 will be making less power until 4500 than the 305 cam.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM





