TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TPI/Super Ram vs LT1 intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #1  
tamatt27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
TPI/Super Ram vs LT1 intake

Which has more low end torque? The TPI/Super Ram or the LT1 intake. I realize the Super Ram gives up a little low end compared to the TPI, but don't both intakes make more torque than the LT1 intake??

Last edited by tamatt27; Mar 14, 2004 at 04:50 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
Slow89Iroc-Z's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: Oswego, IL
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350ci SBC
Transmission: 700R4
TPI due to the extremely long runners.....falls on its face up top tho...
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 08:25 PM
  #3  
89Formula5.7's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Elizabethtown, KY
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: L98 w/ Stealthram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
I should have my LT1 intake on my car this week. I'll let you know what I think.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #4  
DARCOM's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: san antonio tx usa
Car: 84z28
Engine: chevy 388
Transmission: 700r4
i would have to say after playing with all three that the stock tpi will make more torque ,the lt1 intake will make more hp and in the middle the super ram will do both.
and if you just change the runners to slp runners it will give you a little more uper rpm hp.

you can check out my simple page at:
http://darcom.org
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #5  
tamatt27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
I'm just trying to find a way to give more torque to this LT1 I'm going to install. Almost everyone I've talked with says that the LT1 intake is far better than the Super Ram, but I've also heard that the Super Ram provides far better torque lower down that the LT1 intake.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
D Stroy H8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Neither is "better". It is all about where you're powerband is going to be (cam, heads).

You want more torque for your LT1 intake... just keep modding

I wonder if someone will ever fab an LT1 intake to Head spacer... for a longer runner and more low end torque. Doesn't seem like a bad idea.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 11:21 PM
  #7  
mrr23's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
direct results from a member of www.sethirdgen.org the swap was even featured in popular hot rodding.

article

superram to LT1 swap
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 12:05 AM
  #8  
gta324's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,441
Likes: 1
From: sweden
Car: GTA -89
Engine: Blown 415"
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt
Originally posted by D Stroy H8
Neither is "better". It is all about where you're powerband is going to be (cam, heads).

You want more torque for your LT1 intake... just keep modding

I wonder if someone will ever fab an LT1 intake to Head spacer... for a longer runner and more low end torque. Doesn't seem like a bad idea.
Agree, both intakes are great and so is HSR, all intakes can make good power, its where you want the power that decides what intake/cam/head combo you should get.

/N.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 09:39 AM
  #9  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Its not necessarily that they make more torque, its that the short runner LT1 intake, HSR, and miniram move the peak up in the powerband. So low end torque will be higher w/ a SR and a TPI setup.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:39 PM
  #10  
tamatt27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
Thanks guys for the input. That dyno sheet you posted mrr23 proves that the Super Ram has more torque than the LT1 intake. I'm not converting a TPI over to an LT1 intake though. I'm converting my LT1 over to a Super Ram...Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:44 PM
  #11  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
Whoa whoa whoa... don't do that. Why would you pull the LT1 intake off an LT1???

LPE made a SR for a LT1, but it never hit production b/c it made no difference in power really... Keep that intkae on the LT1 motor...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 11:34 AM
  #12  
rockind78's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
I remember reading a tech article not too long ago about that involved a Super Ram to LT-1 intake swap. The Super Ram pulled a much better 60' than the LT-1, but by the 1/4, the LT-1 was almost even. Perhaps John can chime in here with the details.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:04 PM
  #13  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
That may be true, but I think Matt was trying to say that he was gonna pull an LT1 intake off a LT1 motor, and then put a SuperRam on it, which isn't possible w/o the use of the LT1 SR that LPE worked on at one point, but never really produced...
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:24 PM
  #14  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
I'm stubborn! I'll stick with a high-flow TPI setup and still make plenty of power (even upto 5,500 r's - where I shift).
Attached Thumbnails TPI/Super Ram vs LT1 intake-dsc00223.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:25 PM
  #15  
John Millican's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Originally posted by rockind78
I remember reading a tech article not too long ago about that involved a Super Ram to LT-1 intake swap. The Super Ram pulled a much better 60' than the LT-1, but by the 1/4, the LT-1 was almost even. Perhaps John can chime in here with the details.
mmr23 already posted the link to the dyno results of the Superram vs. LT1 intake. It was in the Aug 2003 issue of PHR.

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0803phr_beast/
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #16  
88blackgta's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: End of the earth
Car: 88 GTA Notchback
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
That may be true, but I think Matt was trying to say that he was gonna pull an LT1 intake off a LT1 motor, and then put a SuperRam on it, which isn't possible w/o the use of the LT1 SR that LPE worked on at one point, but never really produced...
The current part numbers for the LT1 SR that was never produced are: 74197L for the manifold and 74196F for the plenum/runner kit. Contact any Accel dealer for pricing.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 05:45 AM
  #17  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Chris89GTA
Whoa whoa whoa... don't do that. Why would you pull the LT1 intake off an LT1???

LPE made a SR for a LT1, but it never hit production b/c it made no difference in power really... Keep that intkae on the LT1 motor...
They made them and sold sold them. The LT1 guys fight over them when they pop up on ebay. LPE pimped them for use on their 383 cars when an automatic trans was going to be used. I still remember that black 4thgen Formula LPE built that some mag guy (Shroeder??) totaled on a dry lake bed. It had one of the LT1 SR's and made a crazy RWHP number.

Personally, I wouldn't bother with the swap and I own a SR.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #18  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
I'm stubborn! I'll stick with a high-flow TPI setup and still make plenty of power (even upto 5,500 r's - where I shift).
Have you had that thing on a dyno or raced it yet?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 09:41 AM
  #19  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
Raced it plenty of times!! Soon as tax refund comes in, it's going straight to the dyno.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 10:51 AM
  #20  
Firebreather's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 306
Likes: 3
Car: 1991 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
This is from a modded 396ci engine. As they said, it depends on application.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 11:54 AM
  #21  
SweetRide45's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Chi Town, IL
1bad91Z: How's your car pull? I was thinking about the sdpc tpi crate engine, but kept getting pushed around idea's...ls1, lt1...etc...In my honest opinion, I think tpi would be the easiest of all the swaps (considering, that's what it's meant to be)...How do you think w/ all your mods, your car performs?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 02:07 PM
  #22  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
The car pulls REAL hard till about 5,300 ~ 5,500 or so. I'm really happy with it!

I've put 4 - 5 car links on an '02 Z06, shutting it down about 120mph. I've also raced two '03 supercharged Cobra's and beat them both by 6 - 8 car lenths (all 3 were red light races from a stop till about 110 - 120 mph).

I've also raced and beat a Saleen S281 supercharged mustang by several car length's, but the Saleen wasn't as fast as the above cars. The Z06 and those 2 Cobra's were the quickest cars I've raced so far.

I can't wait till my refund comes in cause I've been wanting to dyno the car for a long time. Hopefully soon!!


I think the SDPC vortec TPI crate motor is a very good choice for a thirdgen F-body. It also makes more power than an LS-1. But, an LS-1 in a thirdgen would be fun too!!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2004 | 12:37 AM
  #23  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 1bad91Z
Raced it plenty of times!! Soon as tax refund comes in, it's going straight to the dyno.
What kind of MPH are you pulling?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 04:10 AM
  #24  
StevenK's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,508
Likes: 63
From: Austin, Tx
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Hawks 8.8
What kind of MPH are you pulling?
I've put 4 - 5 car links on an '02 Z06, shutting it down about 120mph
Obviously it will go faster, but from that quote it sounds like he likes to stay under 120 most the time, right mike

I can vouch Mike's setup, that thing hauls *****! I just got to ride around in it today and even without the proper rear end gear it can really move.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #25  
tamatt27's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
So no one's behind me on this idea? I still think I'm going to do it though. I'll start out with an LT1 intake, and see how it responds to mods, then I'll do the Super Ram swap, and see if there's any difference...
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #26  
dj haf's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Car: 1990 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by tamatt27
So no one's behind me on this idea? I still think I'm going to do it though. I'll start out with an LT1 intake, and see how it responds to mods, then I'll do the Super Ram swap, and see if there's any difference...
you should swap the LT1 intake for the HSR since they already did it for the LT1 and SR... it'll be cheaper than the SR, and can be used as a reference for other people
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 06:04 AM
  #27  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by StevenK
Obviously it will go faster, but from that quote it sounds like he likes to stay under 120 most the time, right mike

I can vouch Mike's setup, that thing hauls *****! I just got to ride around in it today and even without the proper rear end gear it can really move.
Ohhh, so no track numbers yet. I can't wait to see the results once it's tuned and run at the track
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #28  
camarojoe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Indpls IN US
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: Forged 383
Transmission: Pro-built 700R4
Just got my car running and all figured out for the most part, but all I can say is that the miniram kicks the superrams a$$, when used properly. I swear, my car is faster than any superram/ tpi N/A motor of 383ci or less on these message boards. And don't worry, I'll have videos in less than a week thanks to my new Mavica Sony camera, and I'll also have dyno #'s in a week or so. And after that I'll have some real low 11 sec timeslips at around120+mph when the track opens. I'm not trying to sound cocky, but this thing feels like my SR/afr/219 setup only with a 200hp shot of n02. I'm not worried about new vipers or anything with this setup. This engine sets the car sideways at 70mph in second and I'm running pretty big sticky tires, Yoko A520's 245/40/17's.

Joe
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
Dec 10, 2019 07:07 PM
db057
TBI
14
Apr 28, 2019 07:45 AM
Stangski09
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Nov 14, 2015 01:27 PM
New2Chevy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 28, 2015 12:35 AM
88 TA GTA
LSX and LTX Parts
1
Sep 11, 2015 11:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.