i f***ed up
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Ortonville, Michigan
Car: 1987 Trans am 5.7 TPI
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
i f***ed up
ok being the very broke college student that i am i decided to make my own cold air intake on my 87 TPI. my big hurdle was that i wanted to open the whole thing up..... MAF included
i cut the MAF apart so i was left with only the sensor part, then i cut a square hole and mounted the senser inside the tube, well now here is where i learned that a f***ed up
the car would start then idle really bad and stall when i tried to hit the gas it would die right away. i thought that well,, really kinda hope that, i had made so much new flow that my injectors were now to small to keep up. but after thinking about it and talking to some friends i came to a different conclusion. my intake is so big that the air just goes right aroung the sensor insted of through it so it just won't read right anymore. it might be a combo of the two but i am replacing the injectors any way just not sure what size
but now to the really sh*tty part i need a new MAF...... i was told a while back that a used LS1 MAF with a translator would work really well and it was as big as a i wanted but i still have know clue what to do if anyone could help me fix my error with as little green as posible would be awsome but i want to get as much air through as posible aswell
thanks
mcwille
i cut the MAF apart so i was left with only the sensor part, then i cut a square hole and mounted the senser inside the tube, well now here is where i learned that a f***ed up
the car would start then idle really bad and stall when i tried to hit the gas it would die right away. i thought that well,, really kinda hope that, i had made so much new flow that my injectors were now to small to keep up. but after thinking about it and talking to some friends i came to a different conclusion. my intake is so big that the air just goes right aroung the sensor insted of through it so it just won't read right anymore. it might be a combo of the two but i am replacing the injectors any way just not sure what size
but now to the really sh*tty part i need a new MAF...... i was told a while back that a used LS1 MAF with a translator would work really well and it was as big as a i wanted but i still have know clue what to do if anyone could help me fix my error with as little green as posible would be awsome but i want to get as much air through as posible aswellthanks
mcwille
Re: i f***ed up
I'm guessing from your post that you're not majoring either in English or in Engineering. 
Score a regular Bosch MAF from the parts store and put it back together correctly. Fitting an LS1 MAF to operate w/ a TPI ECM is spotty at best, you need the car to be reliable so you can focus on your classes. Especially English Comp 101.

Score a regular Bosch MAF from the parts store and put it back together correctly. Fitting an LS1 MAF to operate w/ a TPI ECM is spotty at best, you need the car to be reliable so you can focus on your classes. Especially English Comp 101.
Originally posted by mcwille
ok being the very broke college student that i am i decided to make my own cold air intake on my 87 TPI. my big hurdle was that i wanted to open the whole thing up..... MAF included
i cut the MAF apart so i was left with only the sensor part, then i cut a square hole and mounted the senser inside the tube, well now here is where i learned that a f***ed up
the car would start then idle really bad and stall when i tried to hit the gas it would die right away. i thought that well,, really kinda hope that, i had made so much new flow that my injectors were now to small to keep up. but after thinking about it and talking to some friends i came to a different conclusion. my intake is so big that the air just goes right aroung the sensor insted of through it so it just won't read right anymore. it might be a combo of the two but i am replacing the injectors any way just not sure what size
but now to the really sh*tty part i need a new MAF...... i was told a while back that a used LS1 MAF with a translator would work really well and it was as big as a i wanted but i still have know clue what to do if anyone could help me fix my error with as little green as posible would be awsome but i want to get as much air through as posible aswell
thanks
mcwille
ok being the very broke college student that i am i decided to make my own cold air intake on my 87 TPI. my big hurdle was that i wanted to open the whole thing up..... MAF included
i cut the MAF apart so i was left with only the sensor part, then i cut a square hole and mounted the senser inside the tube, well now here is where i learned that a f***ed up
the car would start then idle really bad and stall when i tried to hit the gas it would die right away. i thought that well,, really kinda hope that, i had made so much new flow that my injectors were now to small to keep up. but after thinking about it and talking to some friends i came to a different conclusion. my intake is so big that the air just goes right aroung the sensor insted of through it so it just won't read right anymore. it might be a combo of the two but i am replacing the injectors any way just not sure what size
but now to the really sh*tty part i need a new MAF...... i was told a while back that a used LS1 MAF with a translator would work really well and it was as big as a i wanted but i still have know clue what to do if anyone could help me fix my error with as little green as posible would be awsome but i want to get as much air through as posible aswellthanks
mcwille
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Ortonville, Michigan
Car: 1987 Trans am 5.7 TPI
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
I dont need it reliable. I have a get around beater for that. i'm just trying to follow this basic principal, more air means more fuel can be added to get more horse power. this is just my friday night ride.
p.s. I passed comp 101 with a D, it is my worst subject
p.s. I passed comp 101 with a D, it is my worst subject
Last edited by mcwille; Mar 30, 2005 at 06:25 PM.
Originally posted by mcwille
I dont need it reliable. I have a get around beater for that. i'm just trying to follow this basic principal, more air means more fuel can be added to get more horse power. this is just my friday night ride.
I dont need it reliable. I have a get around beater for that. i'm just trying to follow this basic principal, more air means more fuel can be added to get more horse power. this is just my friday night ride.
With a stock L98 and stock TPI, your MAF and induction tract aren't likely limiting your power production in any meaningful way.
Originally posted by mcwille
p.s. I passed comp 101 with a D, it is my worst subject
p.s. I passed comp 101 with a D, it is my worst subject
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, IN
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Your sensor detects not nessisarily flow as a volume, but as a velocity.
So your sensor reads that the air is traveling at x ft/s.
It will do this no matter what size tube it is in. Where you messed up is with the computer.
The computer converts the flow into a volume by taking the x ft/s the sensor calculated and multiplying it by the AREA of the tube - which is a constant (I'm sure there's other calculations too but I'm just going very basic here).
In fact I think the cpu takes it a step further by using your Volume flow and multiplying by the density determined by your air temperature = g/sec)
So you have x ft/s multiplied by Y Area. The problem is you changed the area so it is multiplying x ft/s by Z Area (Z = modified Area) and so basically the problem lies in the programing. Also by enlarging the Area you have actually decreased the velocity so the computer calculations are completely off and that is why your engine is a boat anchor.
You could probably get into the computer and make changes, but would just be better off putting back a stock unit and work on other mods...
Exhaust,
Plenum porting
cold air
etc...
I do not feel your MAF is holding you back or going to gain you anything at this point.
PS: I'm a SD guy so MAF guys if i'm incorrect on anything let us know!
So your sensor reads that the air is traveling at x ft/s.
It will do this no matter what size tube it is in. Where you messed up is with the computer.
The computer converts the flow into a volume by taking the x ft/s the sensor calculated and multiplying it by the AREA of the tube - which is a constant (I'm sure there's other calculations too but I'm just going very basic here).
In fact I think the cpu takes it a step further by using your Volume flow and multiplying by the density determined by your air temperature = g/sec)
So you have x ft/s multiplied by Y Area. The problem is you changed the area so it is multiplying x ft/s by Z Area (Z = modified Area) and so basically the problem lies in the programing. Also by enlarging the Area you have actually decreased the velocity so the computer calculations are completely off and that is why your engine is a boat anchor.
You could probably get into the computer and make changes, but would just be better off putting back a stock unit and work on other mods...
Exhaust,
Plenum porting
cold air
etc...
I do not feel your MAF is holding you back or going to gain you anything at this point.
PS: I'm a SD guy so MAF guys if i'm incorrect on anything let us know!
Last edited by Chrome; Apr 3, 2005 at 11:43 AM.
Moderator

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Nanticoke, Pa
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 406 CI
Transmission: Pete K 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:55
Call the boneyard. A used sensor is about $75 in my area. My car has gone in the 10's with a stock, descreened sensor. They are not the restriction every claims they are.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by mcwille
i can't find a wells MAF is there anyone who as a other sugjestions aswell?
i can't find a wells MAF is there anyone who as a other sugjestions aswell?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Ortonville, Michigan
Car: 1987 Trans am 5.7 TPI
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Chrome
You could probably get into the computer and make changes, but would just be better off putting back a stock unit and work on other mods...
Exhaust,
Plenum porting
cold air
etc...
You could probably get into the computer and make changes, but would just be better off putting back a stock unit and work on other mods...
Exhaust,
Plenum porting
cold air
etc...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
The MAF measure mass air flow which is in grams/sec which is the units the ECM uses, not velocity which is in ft/sec.
No matter how big of a hole is up front the rest of the induction system determines how much air can be ingested.
The MAF sensor (hot wire anemometer) is calibrated for the mass of the volume of the stock MAF bore, with a larger bore there's more mass, but the sensor only reports the amount for the stock bore (it's not auto-calibrating.) Since green is the control here, just put it back the way it was. Ask around I'm sure there's someone with the knowledge and experience to make it work. There are things you can do by trial and error, but this isn't one, running the car too lean because the ECM can't compensate will cost big time. I'd suggest buying another beater to experiment with.
No matter how big of a hole is up front the rest of the induction system determines how much air can be ingested.
The MAF sensor (hot wire anemometer) is calibrated for the mass of the volume of the stock MAF bore, with a larger bore there's more mass, but the sensor only reports the amount for the stock bore (it's not auto-calibrating.) Since green is the control here, just put it back the way it was. Ask around I'm sure there's someone with the knowledge and experience to make it work. There are things you can do by trial and error, but this isn't one, running the car too lean because the ECM can't compensate will cost big time. I'd suggest buying another beater to experiment with.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Bechtelsville, PA
Car: 93 Sub K1500, 77 GMC K15, 02 Cav
Engine: 350, 355, Ecotec 2.2
Transmission: 4L60E, TH350, Getrag 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73, 10 bolt 3.08
check eBay, used MAFS usually sell for around $50-60. As for injectors, if you want a good upgrade over stock(though with your mods you should not need to change them)go with 24 lb SVO injectors. They are cheap and with an AFPR can make power in the 300+ range.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Ortonville, Michigan
Car: 1987 Trans am 5.7 TPI
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
on the note of modding my engine.... i was told that a zz4 cam would be great in my car..... does any one have any opinions on that one? i know i would need new springs but other than that would it be a nice mod???
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Bechtelsville, PA
Car: 93 Sub K1500, 77 GMC K15, 02 Cav
Engine: 350, 355, Ecotec 2.2
Transmission: 4L60E, TH350, Getrag 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73, 10 bolt 3.08
I agree with Floor Guy, it is a good cam and they cam be found cheap. Lots of them are pulled and replaced with Hot Cams even before the engines are turned over. They have good street manners and in a time of expensive gas should be decent to you at the pump as far as fuel economy.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Bechtelsville, PA
Car: 93 Sub K1500, 77 GMC K15, 02 Cav
Engine: 350, 355, Ecotec 2.2
Transmission: 4L60E, TH350, Getrag 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73, 10 bolt 3.08
If the engine is stock, maybe 10-15 horsepower at most. It starts to pay off more when you upgrade other things. Everything works together. When you stick a cam in it may not feel like much, but you add things like headers, heads, intake, etc, that is when it all starts to come together. As for the injectors, save your money for something else like exhaust or headers. Your stock injectors are more than you need at the moment. You could also look into an adjustable fuel pressure regulator. If you do get a cam that size though, be sure to use the recommended springs with it. Your stock ones will not take it and will make your cam performance suffer(early valve float, etc.). Hope this helps
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
I have a MAF for sale if you still need one, came out of an 89 IROC w/ 350. It only has few hundred miles on it. Switched car to SD, no need for MAF now.
$60.00 US + shipping
Let me know,
Mike
$60.00 US + shipping
Let me know,
Mike
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Ortonville, Michigan
Car: 1987 Trans am 5.7 TPI
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
well when i put the cam in, it would get my headers and exaust put on it. as well as portting the plenum, putting on an Adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator, new plugs, wires and MSD distrubuter. any thoughts on how that might help?
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Bechtelsville, PA
Car: 93 Sub K1500, 77 GMC K15, 02 Cav
Engine: 350, 355, Ecotec 2.2
Transmission: 4L60E, TH350, Getrag 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.73, 10 bolt 3.08
You might be looking at 30-40 horsepower. You may need a chip after all that also







