Ported FIRST Injection Runners
Originally posted by german-motorsport
I need the Lucas Injector info !SOMEONE?
BAD *** what chip or ECU are you using when time with porting is over?
new pics on the port job?
I need the Lucas Injector info !SOMEONE?
BAD *** what chip or ECU are you using when time with porting is over?
new pics on the port job?
I got carried away porting the one pair of runners. I didn’t need to do that if I was going to be comparing the intake to a basically out of the box StealthRam and ported TPI intake. So Ken at FIRST Injections graciously sent me a spare pair of runners for testing. All I did for the testing phase on the 355 is minor gasket matching at the runners and intake to a 1205,, nothing exciting to show there.
I’ll be using the MAF system that came on the 86 IROC. I’ve got a couple custom chips,,, one should be close, but I’ve got the chip burning equipment in case I need to make some changes.
As soon as I’m through testing the unit on the 355, I’ll finish the porting on the rest of the runners and open the intake up to the inside edge of a 1207 gasket opening getting it ready to go on the 406. Depending on how well it does on 355 will give me a good idea of what to expect from it on top of the 406,, and if I’ll need to weld up and “semi-siamese” the runners to get the power and RPM I want out of it.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 2007 Volvo S60R, 2005 Audi A4
Engine: 300HP 2.5L I5, 200HP 2.0L I4
Transmission: TF-80SC, Getrag 6 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.33:1, 3.54:1
BadSS, any news?
Very curious to see this combo run.
Also, can you give a general rundown of the 350 it will be run on?
Thanks!
Very curious to see this combo run.
Also, can you give a general rundown of the 350 it will be run on?
Thanks!
Originally posted by 377Z
BadSS, any news?
Very curious to see this combo run.
BadSS, any news?
Very curious to see this combo run.
Originally posted by 377Z
Also, can you give a general rundown of the 350 it will be run on?
Also, can you give a general rundown of the 350 it will be run on?
---------
This thing looks right at home in the engine bay. This test fit pic shows off the mono blade throttle body and give you a good idea of how large the runners look on the engine.
Originally posted by z_power
BadSS, which (A)FPR do you use and where is it located?
BadSS, which (A)FPR do you use and where is it located?
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Poland
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: a bunch of pieces
Transmission: still there - very stockish TH700
"a tight fit" is very good description
I've been thinking about mounting fpr where the EGR-blockoff plate is, then connecting it with the rest of system with combined braided lines.
I've bought an unused FIRST setup off ebay, it's complete minus fuel rails; Ken at Firstinjections says the rails are $115. Not much, but I forgot to ask if they look like those from german's pics - I'd rather use fittings than clamps on pressure lines... How do your fuel rails connect with each other?
I've been thinking about mounting fpr where the EGR-blockoff plate is, then connecting it with the rest of system with combined braided lines. I've bought an unused FIRST setup off ebay, it's complete minus fuel rails; Ken at Firstinjections says the rails are $115. Not much, but I forgot to ask if they look like those from german's pics - I'd rather use fittings than clamps on pressure lines... How do your fuel rails connect with each other?
I know a set of bar stock rails will not fit this unit. The top of the injectors sit lower than the top of the mounting base of the runners. A flat bar stock rail would hit unless you drilled your own high and notched it low to clear the runner's mounting pad. The stock rails are close to the plenum also,,,, which means you would have your work cut out fabricating a custom set of bar stock rails.
I've got the stock rails like in the picture from german-motorsports. I'd rather have fittings for the cross-overs also, but I'm sure the hose and clamps will hold (so far so good). $115 isn't bad at all for the fuel rails - you'll spend more having someone duplicate them. That is unless you're good at welding round stock tubing.
Thinking about it,,, I guess you could open the two "capped" ends of the FIRST rails by welding in two fittings so all four ends had a fitting. A "Y" inlet up front and running a line from each rear exit into a regulator out back would allow you to weld up the cross-over line fittings. I don't think there's enough room under there to weld on fittings to the existing cross-over nipples and get hose connectors to clear everything.
I've got the stock rails like in the picture from german-motorsports. I'd rather have fittings for the cross-overs also, but I'm sure the hose and clamps will hold (so far so good). $115 isn't bad at all for the fuel rails - you'll spend more having someone duplicate them. That is unless you're good at welding round stock tubing.
Thinking about it,,, I guess you could open the two "capped" ends of the FIRST rails by welding in two fittings so all four ends had a fitting. A "Y" inlet up front and running a line from each rear exit into a regulator out back would allow you to weld up the cross-over line fittings. I don't think there's enough room under there to weld on fittings to the existing cross-over nipples and get hose connectors to clear everything.
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Poland
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: a bunch of pieces
Transmission: still there - very stockish TH700
Yes, i've noticed this interference while watching pictures of the intake in the internet - my manifold is still in the customs office magazine
I'll try to use Holley's prefabricated fuel rail, it's the same profile as used in HSR rails; it could be safely notched ~7/16" from the bottom surface - I'll check if it's enough to clear excessed runner's flange. Got this rail for free, so no loss if it doesn't fit
I'll try to use Holley's prefabricated fuel rail, it's the same profile as used in HSR rails; it could be safely notched ~7/16" from the bottom surface - I'll check if it's enough to clear excessed runner's flange. Got this rail for free, so no loss if it doesn't fit
Originally posted by TPl383
^^^ any new news??
^^^ any new news??
I’ve had the car running since the first of May with the unported FIRST unit and been trying to get it to the track for two months. Aside from one weekend that I had made other plans six months in advance,,, it has rained every weekend. It has rained a lot during the week as well, so I don’t have that much drive time on the car either. Seat of the pants is impressive though with insane throttle response and the typical huge rush of midrange torque you get from a long runner system.
Soon after I get the car to the track with the FIRST unit I’m making a trip to the dyno to test it along with a StealthRam and a mildly ported typical “DIY” type TPI with SLP runners. If time permits, I’ll throw on one of my fully ported TPI/SLP combos,,,, and/or maybe one of John’s LT1 conversion intakes. I know I can get three intakes systems tested, possibly four during the day, five is probably a stretch unless I can use the dyno shop’s air,,, everything goes perfectly,,, and I get lucky and hit the tune by the third pull for each,, so you guys wish me luck.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
I just thought I'd pass this on /......
Ken says this thing will flow over 6000 rpm no problem ( as cast)
they had a 421 ci motor pulling over 600hp . Their runners are 1.75 ...and the base is 1.80 as cast
...Has someone ever hit 600 hp with a stealth ram ?
Ken says this thing will flow over 6000 rpm no problem ( as cast)
they had a 421 ci motor pulling over 600hp . Their runners are 1.75 ...and the base is 1.80 as cast
...Has someone ever hit 600 hp with a stealth ram ?
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
screw the F.I.R.S.T. system, the price to performance ratio is SO not worth it, I would personally end up going with the Stealth ram, 60-70 hp bolt on for half the price. My friend has the stealth ram on his 90 L98 IROC-Z and it is so awesome. 600 hp is a very reachable number, that thing can FLOW.
One mans opinion, let the flaming begin
.
One mans opinion, let the flaming begin
. Last edited by 5SIZ; Jul 10, 2004 at 08:53 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Originally posted by 5SIZ
screw the F.I.R.S.T. system, the price to performance ratio is SO not worth it, I would personally end up going with the Stealth ram, 60-70 hp bolt on for half the price. My friend has the stealth ram on his 90 L98 IROC-Z and it is so awesome. 600 hp is a very reachable number, that thing can FLOW.
One mans opinion, let the flaming begin
.
screw the F.I.R.S.T. system, the price to performance ratio is SO not worth it, I would personally end up going with the Stealth ram, 60-70 hp bolt on for half the price. My friend has the stealth ram on his 90 L98 IROC-Z and it is so awesome. 600 hp is a very reachable number, that thing can FLOW.
One mans opinion, let the flaming begin
. FIRST is emmisions legal and Can be ported well beyond what a HSR cam be.
Ya it cost more. but it looks 10x Better for one. and I bet ya outa the box the first flows better then a HSR.
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 2
From: Costal Alabama
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 350, ZZ4 equivalent
Transmission: Pro-Built Road Race 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Dana 44
Sorry to bring this back from the dead but I am researching runners and found this thread with dyno numbers. Are the AS&M runners tested siamese or just there long tube version?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
All of the AS&M Runners I've seen tested have just been the large tube runners. I have the semi-siamesed versions, though other than being bigger than stock by a good margin, and looking damn sexy under the hood I can't say a thing about their performance from a personal standpoint.
My car runs, and idles. But I haven't had a chance to take it out of the garage yet, so I don't know how it'll perform.
There is also the small fact that I have so many other things done to the car that I can't tell just WHAT the AS&M SS runners add to the equation. Check the sig for details.
My car runs, and idles. But I haven't had a chance to take it out of the garage yet, so I don't know how it'll perform.
There is also the small fact that I have so many other things done to the car that I can't tell just WHAT the AS&M SS runners add to the equation. Check the sig for details.
Originally posted by 89 Iroc Z
Sorry to bring this back from the dead but I am researching runners and found this thread with dyno numbers. Are the AS&M runners tested siamese or just there long tube version?
Sorry to bring this back from the dead but I am researching runners and found this thread with dyno numbers. Are the AS&M runners tested siamese or just there long tube version?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Bringing this back from the dead. Just wondering how things turned out with the First TPI unit? It was installed and running in May, about seven months ago. So there should be some results by now good or so-so.
Allen
Allen I had to put the track and dyno testing on hold for a few months. There has been little to no spare time. So,, there is no solid data, However, the car is running great with it. Throttle response is excellent,,, the ported stock TPI base and modified SLP runners shifted at 5500 rpm, the HSR shifted at 6400 rpm, and the FIRST unit seems to like 5800 rpm. That's very good considering that the standard TPI type intake system was seriously ported and the FIRST unit is as cast. I've played around with the suspension,,, trying to get this IROC to hook with the FIRST unit (having a little trouble in the parking lot). If it hooks at the track, I'm expecting it to run withing .12 - .15 seconds of the StealthRam on this combination. Fully ported, my guess would be it would be just as quick. Again,, that's with this particular combination since at this power level,,, the gearing is more suited for the long runner systems (3.23s with a TH350).
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Glad to know SS, though I am ditching my AS&M setup for sure now. I'll never know what it would truly have done on my car. But the runners will find there way with a ported base, ported heads and all the goodies on another 350. A friends car is getting the donor parts.
While my car is getting a ported, converted LT1 intake, and a LT4-hot cam. With my ported heads, headers, full exhaust, and a tune I think I'll be moving quick enough! Top end out to be out standing compared to what it is now. I only wish I had a really nice set of Alum. Lightings, or AFR 190's to boost power.
While my car is getting a ported, converted LT1 intake, and a LT4-hot cam. With my ported heads, headers, full exhaust, and a tune I think I'll be moving quick enough! Top end out to be out standing compared to what it is now. I only wish I had a really nice set of Alum. Lightings, or AFR 190's to boost power.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Hi BadSS
Thank you for the update. I find it interesting on how much the power band has shifted up the rpm range. I can imagine that hooking up will be the big problem.
Allen
Thank you for the update. I find it interesting on how much the power band has shifted up the rpm range. I can imagine that hooking up will be the big problem.
Allen Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 68
Engine: 383
Transmission: homebuilt 4l60
Good to see some positive words on the First system. I 'm in the process of installing mine and if everything goes as planned hopefully it will be running sometime this weekend.
Originally posted by hot68
Good to see some positive words on the First system. I 'm in the process of installing mine and if everything goes as planned hopefully it will be running sometime this weekend.
Good to see some positive words on the First system. I 'm in the process of installing mine and if everything goes as planned hopefully it will be running sometime this weekend.
The only complaint I have with the FIRST unit (and it relatively minor),, is the positioning of the IAC valve. It is pointed under the plenum and the connector is practically impossible to disconnect for setting the minimum idle speed. I’d advise soldering in a connector in a location where it would be easy to disconnect (what I’ve done). Or,, you can check the bone yards for the brake light connectors (around the bumper area) used on some late model GM pick-ups – they use the same connector as the IAC and make a jumper so you wouldn’t have to splice into the original harness.
Good luck!
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 68
Engine: 383
Transmission: homebuilt 4l60
Well I didn't quite get finish but I'm getting close.
I didn't want to disassemble the throttle body right now. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with it yet. Anyway I ran into a couple of minor problems I have to deal with. I'm going to have to relocate my oil pressure sending unit. I'll need to do something different on my throttle cable. I definitely will need thicker valve cover gaskets as the lip of the intake is thicker will not clear the valve covers with thin gaskets. Both of these 2 things are addressed in the manual so not surprised. I also am planning on using my msd distributor if I can work out the wiring. Shouldn't be much longer till I fire it up!
I didn't want to disassemble the throttle body right now. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with it yet. Anyway I ran into a couple of minor problems I have to deal with. I'm going to have to relocate my oil pressure sending unit. I'll need to do something different on my throttle cable. I definitely will need thicker valve cover gaskets as the lip of the intake is thicker will not clear the valve covers with thin gaskets. Both of these 2 things are addressed in the manual so not surprised. I also am planning on using my msd distributor if I can work out the wiring. Shouldn't be much longer till I fire it up!
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 68
Engine: 383
Transmission: homebuilt 4l60
Originally posted by german-motorsport
hot68 did you get the unit new?
any pics of whats included when bought new?
ECM?Cant see the special MAF so i guess you have the new set up with the drigger wheel?
hot68 did you get the unit new?
any pics of whats included when bought new?
ECM?Cant see the special MAF so i guess you have the new set up with the drigger wheel?
Yes I bought the system new. The kit is pretty much complete even down to nuts bolts clamps etc. I opted for the GM based electronics. It uses the 90-92 GM ecm. I think thats the 7730? Its speed density so no MAF sensor. The electromotive stuff which uses the crank trigger and coil packs is top notch but a little to pricey for me at this time. Electromotive actually designs alot of stuff for the OEMS. here is their website
http://www.electromotive-inc.com/products.html
Originally posted by hot68
Good to see some positive words on the First system. I 'm in the process of installing mine and if everything goes as planned hopefully it will be running sometime this weekend.
Good to see some positive words on the First system. I 'm in the process of installing mine and if everything goes as planned hopefully it will be running sometime this weekend.
Also what kind of work you got done to the Edelbrock heads?
I run the 170cc Edelbrock E-Tec head under a Superram, they feed the motor just fine, did some moderate porting on them though.
Looking good Bro...
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: TX
Car: 68
Engine: 383
Transmission: homebuilt 4l60
Originally posted by OMINOUS_87
Rattle off some motor and drivetrain specs for us brotha.
.
Rattle off some motor and drivetrain specs for us brotha.
.
383 internal balance
scat crank
KB dished hyper's
6" eagle h-beams rod
GM "hot cam"
elebrock heads with roller springs (unported)
crane full race rockers
msd 8361 distributor and 6AL
built 4l60 with transgo reprogramming kit
Eaton posi 3:73
I think the ebrock head is a great street head but looking back I wish I sprung for some AFR's.
German YMG
Last edited by hot68; Jan 4, 2005 at 06:47 AM.
Originally posted by german-motorsport
OMINOUS_87 were the edelbrocks a money decision?
cause the "3rd gen heads" seems to be the afr????
hot you got mail!
OMINOUS_87 were the edelbrocks a money decision?
cause the "3rd gen heads" seems to be the afr????
hot you got mail!
Plus there were alot of bench racing monkeys around here at one point who were always out cheerleading the big port high dollar heads while ripping everything else. They also seemes to have strong bias agaisnt Edelbrock and took every opportunity to tear them down.
Plus when I bought my heads nobody else on this board was running em, I thought I would be first.
I also only run the stock 48mm TB on my 385 motor, however I do concede that part is likley holding me back some.
I should have no problems pushing my car up and over 115_MPH in the 1/4 with a 58mm TB and hitting my shift points. Last time at the track I was bouncing off the revlimiter in both the 1-2 shift and the 2-3 shift due to using the stock tach, which is off by ~500_RPM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
That filter looks too small for your 383. What you need is a good cold air intake system and a larger air filter. IMHO you are giving up some horsepower. Nice looking setup though.
Allen
Allen Originally posted by TPl383
bump...
any new news from anybody?
bump...
any new news from anybody?
I bought another FIRST unit because I could not wait to start modifying one for the 406 in my SS. It's at the machine shop now getting a little extra material welded to the top. My 406 heads are standard port heads,, but the porting was offset (raised up). So even though you can port this FIRST unit to a 1207 gasket in it's normal position, since the port on mine was "raised", the intake requires a little extra welded to the top in order to seal up. I'll post pictures of the modified intake after I get it back and have had time to hog it out.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
Deff post some pic's. Have you had it flowed compaired to the SR? Im trying to tell a buddy of mine its worth buyin a new FIRST rather then a used SR for more then what the FIRST cost.
Im about to buy a FIRST SETUP been talking with ken and says he is working on a Bigger TB now also. Plans are for this to go on a 420sb with Twin Turbos. large t04b's
Im about to buy a FIRST SETUP been talking with ken and says he is working on a Bigger TB now also. Plans are for this to go on a 420sb with Twin Turbos. large t04b's
Originally posted by TPl383
Deff post some pic's. Have you had it flowed compaired to the SR? Im trying to tell a buddy of mine its worth buyin a new FIRST rather then a used SR for more then what the FIRST cost.
Im about to buy a FIRST SETUP been talking with ken and says he is working on a Bigger TB now also. Plans are for this to go on a 420sb with Twin Turbos. large t04b's
Deff post some pic's. Have you had it flowed compaired to the SR? Im trying to tell a buddy of mine its worth buyin a new FIRST rather then a used SR for more then what the FIRST cost.
Im about to buy a FIRST SETUP been talking with ken and says he is working on a Bigger TB now also. Plans are for this to go on a 420sb with Twin Turbos. large t04b's
Larger FIRST T/B for the big engines would be cool. I think way back when you could get them up to 80mm.
I'm waiting for the Vortec intake version to come out. I've got a 99 Tahoe that is begging "to be FIRST".
Supreme Member
iTrader: (26)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 8
From: Moneta, VA
Car: 89 formula 350
Engine: ls1 magnuson tvs2300 supercharger
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4.11 Dana 44!
hey guys....I like your progress with the First setup! Im looking to get one soon myself. Do either of you guys have a list of additional parts you had to buy (AFPR, stainless fuel lines etc)? I would REALLY appreciate any help! Thanks 
-Justin

-Justin
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Flow numbers and some comparison track times :-)
I would buy that bad boy to feed my 383 instead of the Stealthram, it fits without hacking and most people think it was a tpi setup with runners. lol
later
Jeremy
I would buy that bad boy to feed my 383 instead of the Stealthram, it fits without hacking and most people think it was a tpi setup with runners. lol
later
Jeremy
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
We ever going to see flow numbers or this thing run?
:-)
later
Jeremy
We ever going to see flow numbers or this thing run?
:-)
later
Jeremy
I doubt that I will get flow numbers on either the stock or ported FIRST. I'm bolting the ported FIRST to a set of heads that flowed 328cfm at .650 lift,, which is at "cam lift" for the cam I'll be using. So,,, if it does as well as I expect it to do,,,, and it doesn't choke these heads down,, then it's save to say it will flow good enough for 98% of the heads it will fit.
Finally,,,, some ETs
Box Stock FIRST Injections intake - Best run in 80 degree temps with mild pocket port / clean-up on the G1 heads with 5800/5600 shift point
60ft------ 1/8 ET -----MPH ------ 1/4 ET ----- MPH
1.707 --- 7.992 ----- 85.526 --- 12.599 --- 106.702
That's a fairly impressive 60ft time and was somewhat unexpected for this power level engine. However, the power band for this FIRST intake is about perfect for this combination (355 with 3.23 gears). It didn't feel like the car was dropping off in power up to 6000 rpm, but the ETs showed the car liked to be shifted at 5800 out of 1st (5600 rpm shift caused spinning into 2nd) and at 5600 coming out of 2nd gear. Porting the runners to 1.8 - 1.82" would improve on the time and mph.
__________________
Just for reference purposes - not an apples to apples comparison!!!
STEALTHRAM - Best run in 80 degree temps and box stock TFS G1 heads with 6400/6200 shift points. 3.23 gears & 26x11.5 ET Streets.
60ft------ 1/8 ET -----MPH ------ 1/4 ET ----- MPH
1.803 --- 8.133 ----- 86.37 ---- 12.673 --- 107.84
That StealthRam rolled off a lot of bottom end compared to the fully ported stock base and SLP runners. This FIRST unit isn't as violent as the ported stock base / SLP combination off idle, but it is a VERY happy medium between the two systems.
Box Stock FIRST Injections intake - Best run in 80 degree temps with mild pocket port / clean-up on the G1 heads with 5800/5600 shift point
60ft------ 1/8 ET -----MPH ------ 1/4 ET ----- MPH
1.707 --- 7.992 ----- 85.526 --- 12.599 --- 106.702
That's a fairly impressive 60ft time and was somewhat unexpected for this power level engine. However, the power band for this FIRST intake is about perfect for this combination (355 with 3.23 gears). It didn't feel like the car was dropping off in power up to 6000 rpm, but the ETs showed the car liked to be shifted at 5800 out of 1st (5600 rpm shift caused spinning into 2nd) and at 5600 coming out of 2nd gear. Porting the runners to 1.8 - 1.82" would improve on the time and mph.
__________________
Just for reference purposes - not an apples to apples comparison!!!
STEALTHRAM - Best run in 80 degree temps and box stock TFS G1 heads with 6400/6200 shift points. 3.23 gears & 26x11.5 ET Streets.
60ft------ 1/8 ET -----MPH ------ 1/4 ET ----- MPH
1.803 --- 8.133 ----- 86.37 ---- 12.673 --- 107.84
That StealthRam rolled off a lot of bottom end compared to the fully ported stock base and SLP runners. This FIRST unit isn't as violent as the ported stock base / SLP combination off idle, but it is a VERY happy medium between the two systems.
Last edited by BadSS; Apr 10, 2005 at 11:43 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Very impressive numbers. Glad to see the TPI doing well. Looks like the First system is a very good choice.
Allen
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Royal_Z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Sep 30, 2015 08:45 PM





