Cylinder Runners
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 87 Trans Am, 89 RX7
Engine: 350tpi,350carb
Transmission: T-5,t56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi,4.11 posi
Cylinder Runners
Which cylinder runners do you guys think are better, the siamesed runners, I have heard these offer maximum performance but sacrifice torque, or the standard type of runner( note that by this I dont mean stock, I mean like the kind that Arizona Speed and Marine make, but I have seen the results of the whole tpi shootout think and I'm not asking for the best runners by company, I'm asking which type of runner you guys seem to like the most/ get the most power/ torque from.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
I'm guessing you're talking about LTR's correct? (Long tube runners).
If we were talking about ALL intakes, I'd say more torque down low for a street car and sacrifice the upper HP. For a track car, go for HP at the expense of some torque.
....HOWEVER, if we're ONLY talking about LTRs, then I'd say go for max HP, regardless of application. Unfortuanely, ALL LTRs will end up costing you HP up top, no matter what you do to 'em, but ALL of 'em make good torque. Even the most siamesed, hogged out, ported runners will make plenty of torque, and will have limited high flow numbers. The torque loss would be minimal.
...I have pondered this exact question for a LONG time now in expectation of a motor build soon! I plan on getting some SLP's and workin' the heck out of 'em.
If we were talking about ALL intakes, I'd say more torque down low for a street car and sacrifice the upper HP. For a track car, go for HP at the expense of some torque.
....HOWEVER, if we're ONLY talking about LTRs, then I'd say go for max HP, regardless of application. Unfortuanely, ALL LTRs will end up costing you HP up top, no matter what you do to 'em, but ALL of 'em make good torque. Even the most siamesed, hogged out, ported runners will make plenty of torque, and will have limited high flow numbers. The torque loss would be minimal.
...I have pondered this exact question for a LONG time now in expectation of a motor build soon! I plan on getting some SLP's and workin' the heck out of 'em.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
As a lot of you know I have hogged out my SLP runners. They are fully siamesed. With all the upgrades I have done I still have more torque at the rear wheels than the factory 1989 TPI had at the crank. 370RWTQ now versus 335TQ on the factory TPI motor.
I would not mind killing off some of the low end torque because of the hooking up issues at the track and on the street. I guess I could have worse problems.
Arizona Speed and Marine does make a fine runner though. If you go with siamesed runners you will flow enough air for a host of future mods provided you upgrade the intake manifold while you are at it.
I would not mind killing off some of the low end torque because of the hooking up issues at the track and on the street. I guess I could have worse problems.
Arizona Speed and Marine does make a fine runner though. If you go with siamesed runners you will flow enough air for a host of future mods provided you upgrade the intake manifold while you are at it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Royal_Z
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Sep 30, 2015 08:45 PM




I meant to make a poll for this topic. 



