TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Rocker arms or New Cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 01:10 PM
  #1  
25thannivZ28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 9
From: Wisconsin
Car: 1992 Z28 Camaro w/70k
Engine: 427 w/4" Mufflex Exhaust
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.10:1
New Rocker arms or New Cam?

Hey everyone, as you see the size cam that I have is listed in my signature, wondering if I would be best off going w/a new cam to to gain lift or should I just replace my 1.5 rockers with 1.6 rockers? Any advantages/dis-advantages to either option? All technical help is appreciated, thanks.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 05:08 PM
  #2  
Mark 89Formula's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Madison, AL, USA
Changing the rocker arms is a much easier way to increase lift but you need to be careful with your Twisted Wedge heads. TFS wants you to run a custom piston when the valve lift exceeds .510" or so due to the revised valve angles. Changing to 1.6 rockers put the valve lift at .512". You really need to check your valve to piston clearance before runnning the engine.

Consider a cam change when you want to change the valve opening/closing points (duration and LSA) in addition to valve lift.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #3  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
also, 1.6 rockers will help you if you need more lift, but valve lift for valve lift, if you were to tun a cam with 1.5's that would give you the same specs as yours with 1.6's, it'd make more power. - leverage. 1.6's move the pushrod closer to the pivot, thus increasing the lift. SBC's already have crappy geometry here, so 1.6's make things worse. Ever wondered why shaft rockers are so nice and make so much power? The stand actually move the pivot point further from the spring, thus allowing the pushrod to be further from the pivot while still keeping the same ratio. - Thus taking less force to open the spring = less rotational torque.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
morrow
Suspension and Chassis
78
Jan 13, 2024 12:29 PM
angel2794
Engine Swap
11
Sep 8, 2015 06:22 PM
SLNTSCPE
Tech / General Engine
3
Aug 22, 2015 09:15 PM
Zeek1041
Theoretical and Street Racing
6
Aug 21, 2015 08:45 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 PM.