what about turbo chargers
i was asking because i don't know plus i heard turbo chragers are better than super chargers because the super charger runs its force induction from the crank shaft and turbo runs from the exhaust presure or something of that nature (that is according to sports car international the jan. 2001 issue
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 27
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Turbo chargers are more efficient, and you can get more boost out of them, but they are not smog legal, if that is a concern where you live. Check out the power adders forum on here and ask them.
------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, ON, Canada
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 4 Spd Auto
Either one is good, I think that turbos are used more on smaller engines because they dont take power from the engine to make more. Theres plenty of big turbo charged motors around, if your really looking for performance though, you might be better off building up a 350 and then going from there becauses theres alot more performance parts for 350s and you can make lots of power too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post









