TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hydraulic Roller ($$$) Vs. Other ($) ?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2001 | 11:52 PM
  #1  
Remondi2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: E. Lansing, MI, USA
Hydraulic Roller ($$$) Vs. Other ($) ?????

Why are roller cams sooooooooooo much more expensive than the hydraulic and flat tappet non-roller versions? Can I put on of these cheaper styles in my car and still run rollers on it? I'm running tpi and I don't want to confuse the stock computer setup, so I figured runnning rollers is my only option. Will rolllers work with a non-rolller cam in a roller block? I'm confused....If anybody knows why/whynot to do this I would be glad to listen, thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2001 | 09:21 AM
  #2  
ws6transam's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 900
Likes: 1
From: Haslett, MI
Car: 1984 Trans Am WS6
Engine: Minirammed 385, 396 RWHP
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Moser 12-bolt
It makes no sense to run rollers on a non-roller cam. The ramps are optimized for a flat tappet lifter. A roller cam has much more aggressive ramps that bring the lifter and valvetrain open much faster. If you used a roller cam with flat-tappet lifters, the lifter would dig into the cam surface and ruin it. The lobes are also ground differently: The roller lobes are flat across the top whereas the flat-tappet lobe is designed to make the lifter rotate. you do not want to rotate a roller lifter or the roller itself will no longer roll! That's why the rollers are typically tied together with a bar or held in place with a sheet metal spider in the lifter valley.


[This message has been edited by ws6transam (edited February 13, 2001).]
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2001 | 12:53 PM
  #3  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Roller cams cost more because they're the "hot new thing" and they can charge accordingly. But roller cams are definitely worth the extra money. Dont put a non-roller cam in your car if you have a roller cam now, thats a downgrade.

------------------
West Coast GM Shootout 2001!
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2001 | 04:52 PM
  #4  
a73camaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Rollers cams have been around for decades. Supply and demand curves.

The roller cam is of a harder material that non-roller cams, harder to produce and machine. Roller lifters are more complicated that non-rollers. That drives up cost to produce.

Roller is "tricker" and that also adds to the price.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM
Agent507943
Firebirds Wanted
1
Oct 2, 2015 07:18 AM
92projectcamaro
Engine Swap
4
Sep 29, 2015 07:07 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM
mfp189
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
Sep 27, 2015 09:25 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.