MAF MAP
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Orrville, Ohio
Car: 87 sport coupe, 85 Z28, 93 S10
Engine: 179ci MPFI,LG4 (soon L98), 4.3L TBI
Transmission: 700r4, none (soon T56), 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock, 3.23, stock
MAF MAP
What is the difference between a MAP style TPI and a MAF style horsepower-wise or why did GM switch to it?
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 3
From: Norwich, CT
Car: '89 Trans AM/'88 GTA
Engine: (2) Tuned Port L98's
Re: MAF MAP
A rough & quick explanation of the two.
MAF system was commonly used throughout the
early to late 80's engine, and some late model cars
used MAF throughout the european and import cars.
the MAF sensor is the single most vital part of
a MAF TPI, calculating the air that flows through the
engine, giving the ECM information so it can adjust it's
running parameters. These systems respond well to engine
modifications without alot of the tuning hassle, but you
have to deal with the bottle neck of the sensor.. limiting
the air taken in.
MAP is the exact opposite. Requires no sensor before the
Throttlebody. MAP's make more of a educated guess of how
much air is consumed. Any internal modifcations will change
the way the car runs itself, and most require some sort of
tune. Alot of people run MAP's due to it's no hassle, tune &
go functionality, & and the fact it looks cleaner.
and, it is somewhat more economical, but eh..
Im sure there is more info on the MAP systems, use
the 'Search' function. Or check out the TPI OBDII sticky.
Im sure you can pick up a few things in that thread.
MAF system was commonly used throughout the
early to late 80's engine, and some late model cars
used MAF throughout the european and import cars.
the MAF sensor is the single most vital part of
a MAF TPI, calculating the air that flows through the
engine, giving the ECM information so it can adjust it's
running parameters. These systems respond well to engine
modifications without alot of the tuning hassle, but you
have to deal with the bottle neck of the sensor.. limiting
the air taken in.
MAP is the exact opposite. Requires no sensor before the
Throttlebody. MAP's make more of a educated guess of how
much air is consumed. Any internal modifcations will change
the way the car runs itself, and most require some sort of
tune. Alot of people run MAP's due to it's no hassle, tune &
go functionality, & and the fact it looks cleaner.
and, it is somewhat more economical, but eh..
Im sure there is more info on the MAP systems, use
the 'Search' function. Or check out the TPI OBDII sticky.
Im sure you can pick up a few things in that thread.
Last edited by TPI; Sep 14, 2007 at 04:44 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
Feb 26, 2016 02:57 PM




