SR w/T-56?
SR w/T-56?
Anyone using or know of anyone successfully using a Superram and a T-56?
In Lingenfelter's book he states, on page 127, "The short runner intake (LT1) works best with the 6-speed's close gear spacing. Conversely, the stronger mid-range power and wider power band of the SR performs excellently with the automatic, although we have successfully used the SuperRam with the 6-speed when brutal street torque is the goal."
What are the real life pros and cons of this setup?
Thanks.
------------------
In Lingenfelter's book he states, on page 127, "The short runner intake (LT1) works best with the 6-speed's close gear spacing. Conversely, the stronger mid-range power and wider power band of the SR performs excellently with the automatic, although we have successfully used the SuperRam with the 6-speed when brutal street torque is the goal."
What are the real life pros and cons of this setup?
Thanks.
------------------
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 938
Likes: 1
From: Hinesville, GA USA
Car: '86 IROC-Z/'94 Z28
Engine: 350 LT1/382 LT1
Transmission: 4L60-E/T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.45/3.42 (soon 4.10)
I don't know since I've never used a T-56 and a SR, but I'm building my car like that too...I'd like to know as well! Eager to find out...
I know the close gear ranges of the 6-speed would keep the car in the powerband longer, therefore closer to the power peak. This is a nice trans since you can also run low gears and still log excellent MPG for a modded street car. The SR supposedly lengthens the powerband while increasing performance across it, making it very suitable for a multipurpose high-performance engine. Unfoutunatly, I have yet to drive this setup I'm building for my '86 IROC, so I cannot point out the bad things, just the good ones. Can anybody who has this setup help us out???
[This message has been edited by dhirocz (edited March 11, 2001).]
I know the close gear ranges of the 6-speed would keep the car in the powerband longer, therefore closer to the power peak. This is a nice trans since you can also run low gears and still log excellent MPG for a modded street car. The SR supposedly lengthens the powerband while increasing performance across it, making it very suitable for a multipurpose high-performance engine. Unfoutunatly, I have yet to drive this setup I'm building for my '86 IROC, so I cannot point out the bad things, just the good ones. Can anybody who has this setup help us out???
[This message has been edited by dhirocz (edited March 11, 2001).]
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Pros: Your engine will make more power.
Cons: It costs a lot of money.
The superram doesnt care what transmission you have behind it.
------------------
West Coast GM Shootout 2001!
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Cons: It costs a lot of money.
The superram doesnt care what transmission you have behind it.
------------------
West Coast GM Shootout 2001!
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
I run the SR and a 5 speed. My car is in the 12s solid, I destroy my tires 315-35-17s in 1 and 2 and sometimes 3. I think the SR is excellent you will be happy. SR+6speed+good heads = tire shreding power.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








