LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
I know a lot of the TBI guys run LT1 cams, does anyone have an LT1 cam in an LB9?? I really don't want to dish out $300 for a roller cam when I have a stock 1993 LT1 cam laying around, and it is considerably bigger than the peanut cam that is in the car now. Also, will LT1 valve springs work with the LB9 heads? I also got a set of Crane .550 lift single springs for an LT1 which would go on when I did the cam swap. The lift on an LT1 cam is around .460, so are the springs going to be too much???
BTW, why do people say that the LT1 cam is just a step up from the LB9 cam? Here are the specs
Peanut Cam - Duration at .050: 179/194 Lift: .350/.384
LT1 Cam - Duration at .050: 202/207 Lift: .450/.460
That is a huge step in my opinion when it comes to cams.
BTW, why do people say that the LT1 cam is just a step up from the LB9 cam? Here are the specs
Peanut Cam - Duration at .050: 179/194 Lift: .350/.384
LT1 Cam - Duration at .050: 202/207 Lift: .450/.460
That is a huge step in my opinion when it comes to cams.
Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; Apr 11, 2008 at 10:33 AM.
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
A few years back I put a 93' LT1 F-body cam in an 88' 5 speed car (single cat, non-G92). Small upgrade while the motor was out - but it seemed to like it. (And yes, I know the M5 cars had a bigger cam that the A4 cars).
The way I see it, you can get a used LT1 cam dirt cheap. And your car will idle/run fine on the stock tune with that cam. I would go with it. As for valvesprings, I think LT4 hot cam springs are pretty cheap. They fit the stock pockets and are good to .525" lift. The .550" lift springs would be a bit overkill.
The way I see it, you can get a used LT1 cam dirt cheap. And your car will idle/run fine on the stock tune with that cam. I would go with it. As for valvesprings, I think LT4 hot cam springs are pretty cheap. They fit the stock pockets and are good to .525" lift. The .550" lift springs would be a bit overkill.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Yeah that is what I was thinking on the springs. I will probably just replace them with new LT1 valve springs which are the same part number as new replacements for the LB9. They are Sealed Power VS677. They are about $2.50 a piece.
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Being your car has a peanut cam, it will wake up more so than that 5 speed car did IMHO. What does your car run now with the current mods? I had an 89' IROC vert in the late 90's. It had: PI 2600 converter, rebuilt 700R4 w/ a Transgo, Borla CB, air foil, ported plenum, UD pullies, LCA's & PHB, K&N's, gutted air box, !smog pump, !cat, 3.23 gears.
I ran 14.3-14.4 @ 96+ on BFG drags. 14.60's on street radials. Still had stock manifolds and the wimpy peanut cam. I felt the car had 13.90's in it with a cam swap and a good set of headers, but never got around to it.
I ran 14.3-14.4 @ 96+ on BFG drags. 14.60's on street radials. Still had stock manifolds and the wimpy peanut cam. I felt the car had 13.90's in it with a cam swap and a good set of headers, but never got around to it.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
There's no telling if your engine actually has the peanut cam unless you check it with a dial indicator. I have seen people with '87 TPIs on this board claim both camshafts in their car.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
As the car sits right now it runs a 8.90's at 81 in the eighth mile. Cant spray until second though. That is with street tires and a 2.73 gear. Other plans are to complement the cam with a 3.42 gear and a afpr. What fuel pressure should I run with that setup and a set of 22 lb injectors???
A guy told me that a 80 mph trap in the 1/8th will get me mid to low 13's in the 1/4, but theres only one way to find out and there are no 1/4 mile tracks within about 1.5 hours from here.
A guy told me that a 80 mph trap in the 1/8th will get me mid to low 13's in the 1/4, but theres only one way to find out and there are no 1/4 mile tracks within about 1.5 hours from here.
Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; Apr 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 3
From: mid GA
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI w/ l98 cam
Transmission: T5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi disc 9 bolt
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
i have an 88 iroc 305 tpi auto. i have since converted it to a t5 and i put in a l98 tpi cam, so i had the peanut cam and i am going to the biggest cam made in thirdgens, it is still a small cam but i am building this car as an everyday driver so i didnt want anything aggresive and i didnt wanna spend $300 for an aftermarket, i wanted the lt1 cam but a mw66nova had a l98 cam and he lives just up the road from me. so i bought that and put it in. the motor is assembled but not in the car, i am shooting to have the motor ready to go in the car before work tomorrow and then stick it in tomorrow night, i am shooting to have it running monday afternoon (have to work all day sunday too..) i am going to keep the motor completely stock with the exception of the l98 cam, but i am going to add on pieces later on to see how they helped, i am eventually going to go with 1.6 rr's, afpr, slp runners and diy port upper and lower intake that is probly all i will do to this engine b/c i am going to be driving it everyday but i want to do those mods individually and see how much i gained from them. but i will update yall once its running and i also am going to be racing it on the 20th so ill post some times.
the car ran a 15.4 completely stock that is with the 305 tpi auto and 2.73 gears but that is when i had just bought the car and it sat for 2 years, it needed a tune up something terrible trap speed was 88 mph. here is my new setup what do you guys think it will run?
305 tpi with l98 cam, t5 and 3.45 gears, with a 100 hp shot and a set of worn out 26" slicks, edit: i am also going to have an msd 6al and a two step for launching, and probably a set of underdrive pulleys
i am hoping for 14.80's or better on motor and 13.9's or better on the 100 shot. what do you guys think?
the car ran a 15.4 completely stock that is with the 305 tpi auto and 2.73 gears but that is when i had just bought the car and it sat for 2 years, it needed a tune up something terrible trap speed was 88 mph. here is my new setup what do you guys think it will run?
305 tpi with l98 cam, t5 and 3.45 gears, with a 100 hp shot and a set of worn out 26" slicks, edit: i am also going to have an msd 6al and a two step for launching, and probably a set of underdrive pulleys
i am hoping for 14.80's or better on motor and 13.9's or better on the 100 shot. what do you guys think?
Last edited by maroon88iroc; Apr 12, 2008 at 01:36 AM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Definitely budget headers in. I bought Hedman shorties with a Y for $250 and the gains were well worth it. I am not sure what it actually gained, but the car sounds better and is much better to drive. It improved low end torque as well as high end power. It doesn't seem to drop off as much at 4500 after the headers and Y. That car should be much faster than mine considering bigger cam, 5 speed, gear, bigger shot, and slicks. It should run low 13's if you can drive it.
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: ny
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73(coming soon)
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
so the best cam replacment for the 305 tpi auto cars is the lt1 cam correct?....with out having to mod anything else? or having to stall the tranny
Last edited by billybird; Apr 13, 2008 at 10:07 AM.
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 92 RS, 87 Formula, 89 IROC, 05 SRT4
Engine: 5.0 TBI, 5.7 TPI, 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 x2, T-5
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.42 posi x2
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
I had to come up with something different seeing as my 86 was a non roller, but I've found the Melling RV cam works really well with the TPI setup, and coincidentally, it's almost identical to the 350 cam in the 92 Z28. just a thought.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
The springs I was considering are only good to .450 lift, so that is out. I already have .550 lift springs, would it really be bad to run that big of a spring? They are just a single spring with a damper. What would be the downfalls of running that spring???
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
They're just overkill, but if you already have them - use them. In rare cases, you might collapse a lifter if they are high mileage with the added spring pressure. What are the specs? Seat pressure, and open? More than likely you'll be fine, but I would replace the lifters during the swap for good measure.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
I would rather buy springs than lifters, but then again I may have a lifter going bad because I recently changed to 5W-30 oil after I replaced my valve stem seals and now I have a ticking in the motor. I am pretty sure it is a lifter because there are no exhaust leaks, and it increases with RPM. I am going to switch back to 10W-40 and see how that does.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Spring lift isnt critical when using a stock cam, its the spring pressure when closed and when open that will matter. If they're stock size 1.25" springs I dont think you can get too much pressure to mess something up. They should be in the 110-130 range when closed and 300 when open.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Recommended Camshaft Style Roller hydraulic Installed Height (in) 1.750 in. Seat Pressure at Installed Height (lbs) 108 lbs. Open Height (in) 1.250 in. Open Pressure (lbs) 339 lbs.
I believe they are these Lunati springs. Take a look and see what you think.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
I may end up with these Sealed Power springs from advance. They seem like a better choice. Here are the specs. Check em out.
http://www.northernautoparts.com/Pro...ctModelId=2297
I believe they are these Lunati springs. Take a look and see what you think.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
I may end up with these Sealed Power springs from advance. They seem like a better choice. Here are the specs. Check em out.
http://www.northernautoparts.com/Pro...ctModelId=2297
Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; Apr 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
So back to the original question. Does anybody have a straight answer for this? I have a 1987 350 TPI (IROC-Z) with roller lifters, non roller rockers, EDL-5894 SPRING KIT. Now with that said, can a LT1 cam from a 1994 Z-28 be installed into the factory ECM without any tuning? Does anybody have an answer to this question?
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Yes, installing an LT1 camshaft is like putting 1.6 rockers on a TPI cam. You'll be fine with the stock computer tuning.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Thanks Kevin91Z. Now I feel comfortable.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 7
From: Northern California - Bay Area
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
What kind of power gains will you get from putting on 1.6 rockers or and LT1 cam in a stock L98?
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Not sure what your asking. Timing the cam perhaps? I dont know that part. I just stabbed the cam, put everything back together, and adjusted the valve lash. If anything, the timing should be adjusted at 6* with the EST wire disconnected. Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Not sure about that one. But there was an obvious difference in my 86 IROC. It had a stock roller cam. After my overhaul, I stabbed in a 94 Z-28 roller cam and the difference that I saw was that I was planted into my seat a little more. I dont have enough money to pay for specs at a DYNO shop.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 7
From: Northern California - Bay Area
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: L98 - full intake & exhaust boltons
Transmission: Bowtie 700r4, 2400 rpm stall
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 9bolt, 3.45 gears, posi
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Oh ok I was wondering. I am thinking about making a cam mod and intake mod next. I already have headers and exhaust. I want to get some intake runners and a base and see what difference it makes on a stock engine.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Kevin91Z, what would happen if I throw in 1.6 rockers onto my 94 Z28 cam that is in my 86 IROC-Z?
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Degreeing the cam, I dont know but you'll need a dial wheel. and above 6 hours of your personal time because it's a little tougher degreeing with the engine in the car.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 305 tpi (LB9)
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi
Re: LT1 cam a good upgrade for a LB9???
Does anyone have the specs for the L98 cam? I'm curious how much difference there is between the L98 and LT1 cams.
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,915
Likes: 40
From: Far West
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 Tuned Port Injection, for now.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi - 3.23
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post











