Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
I havent purchased one but from what I've seen from a vette member, its as tall if not abit shorter than the HSR and should fit under most hoods...BUT the issue is with the TB...well it may be an issue... Theres a flange that extends upward on those TB's which makes it the low clearance point.
http://forum.planetisuzoo.com/viewto...52856&start=25
Some pics down the page there of the proflo setup. HSR rubbed on my iroc hood by the TB, so anything higher at that point, it may be a concern i just dont have dimensions in front of me
http://forum.planetisuzoo.com/viewto...52856&start=25
Some pics down the page there of the proflo setup. HSR rubbed on my iroc hood by the TB, so anything higher at that point, it may be a concern i just dont have dimensions in front of me
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
I think some people have flipped the TB upside down, which fixes the "up" angle issue I believe. ....as for the intake itself, I really like the look, but have heard a lot of issues with edelbrock's quality. I think you have to be prepared to port.
EDIT....so I know I've heard people talk about flipping the TB. I think it's for the throttle cable, but...on the edelbrock, the brackets are already on the passenger side, so no need. Is the "up" angle in the manifold, or the TB itself?
EDIT....so I know I've heard people talk about flipping the TB. I think it's for the throttle cable, but...on the edelbrock, the brackets are already on the passenger side, so no need. Is the "up" angle in the manifold, or the TB itself?
Last edited by Abubaca; Jul 31, 2012 at 04:09 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 29
From: Aurora, OR
Car: 87 IROC Z28
Engine: 355 cid TPI
Transmission: Custom Built 700R4 w/3,500 stall
Axle/Gears: QP fab 9" 3.70 Truetrac
Re: Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
From the photo in the link it looks like the raised TB flange is part of the manifold.
Re: Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
I think some people have flipped the TB upside down, which fixes the "up" angle issue I believe. ....as for the intake itself, I really like the look, but have heard a lot of issues with edelbrock's quality. I think you have to be prepared to port.
EDIT....so I know I've heard people talk about flipping the TB. I think it's for the throttle cable, but...on the edelbrock, the brackets are already on the passenger side, so no need. Is the "up" angle in the manifold, or the TB itself?
EDIT....so I know I've heard people talk about flipping the TB. I think it's for the throttle cable, but...on the edelbrock, the brackets are already on the passenger side, so no need. Is the "up" angle in the manifold, or the TB itself?
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 411
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
It blocks the water port hole then.
heard a lot of issues with edelbrock's quality
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 29
From: Aurora, OR
Car: 87 IROC Z28
Engine: 355 cid TPI
Transmission: Custom Built 700R4 w/3,500 stall
Axle/Gears: QP fab 9" 3.70 Truetrac
Re: Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT7137
The anti-icing system that routes coolant through the TB may be necessary in cold northern climates if a car is driven during near freezing temperatures. Otherwise, since the coolest possible air charge is what the engine wants, routing coolant through the TB is counter productive.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
May 17, 2020 10:44 AM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:30 PM
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 25, 2015 04:47 AM










