TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2015 | 07:04 PM
  #51  
cuisinartvette's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 27
From: Sanctuary state
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

To flow all eight will cost
Flowing 2 prior to then after providing they are using calipers/propering measuring tools youll probably be Ok. Hard for me as I get ocd and make a career out of those stupid things lol. Porting those is a rediculous amount of work to do one right, most shops wont come near them. About 10 yrs ago I aske a shop about doing one...wanted 850 and didnt really want to do it. Thats where I started up...
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2015 | 11:14 PM
  #52  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by 1MeanZ
Depends on how they are porting the intake. I flowed mine before and after but I didn't do every single port.
Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
To flow all eight will cost. Flowing 2 prior to then after providing they are using calipers/proper measuring tools you'll probably be Ok. Hard for me as I get ocd and make a career out of those stupid things lol. Porting those is a ridiculous amount of work to do one right, most shops won't come near them. About 10 yrs ago I asked a shop about doing one...wanted 850 and didn't really want to do it. Thats where I started up...
Not sure how they came up with these numbers but if they're correct & there isn't too much variation between ports, I'm Happy (No way of really knowing unless I have all the ports flowed. Therefore, Ignorance is Bliss)

Really hoping to see some gains on the Dyno!

Valve Lift CFM Head Flow Before Porting After Porting
0.100 66 64 65
0.200 121 117 119
0.300 182 177 183
0.400 231 213 225
0.500 264 235 253
0.600 275 241 262
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 03:03 PM
  #53  
palric's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 2
From: British Columbia
Car: 90 IROC 5.7 hardtop
Engine: L98
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: Yup -- they still work
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

The build as you described it should produce much better numbers than you attained. I did a similar build with a '90 L98, it is also a 700r4 but with speed density not MAF. My post build numbers were unbelievably low 244hp and 338tq at the wheels.

I spent 8 months obsessed with trying to locate the cause of my lost HP/TQ. Tore it down, checked everything, put it back together again. Back to the dyno. Threw parts at it. Back to the dyno. Tuned and re-tuned, back and forth to the dyno. Thoroughly pissed off, almost ready to give the car away in disgust, I moved on to the next mod. Swapping the 700r4 for a T5.

Unexpected results. With the T5 installed the dyno showed an increase to 289rwhp and 398rwtq. No other mods/changes.

What I concluded is in some way the combination of performance mods and 7004r were incompatible. I never got to the bottom of it, never did figure out why, I did not care.

Not saying your 700r4 is your issue, just saying it was my issue and I never suspected it.

...

Last edited by palric; Dec 12, 2015 at 03:06 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 06:42 PM
  #54  
1MeanZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Palric, I could have been your trans, but it was more likely the torque converter.....
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2015 | 08:36 PM
  #55  
palric's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 2
From: British Columbia
Car: 90 IROC 5.7 hardtop
Engine: L98
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: Yup -- they still work
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by 1MeanZ
Palric, I could have been your trans, but it was more likely the torque converter.....
I think you are correct. But I never had it checked.

Just wanted to make SixSeriesCSi aware that this kind of thing is possible.

best regards
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2015 | 03:00 AM
  #56  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by palric
The build as you described it should produce much better numbers than you attained. I did a similar build with a '90 L98, it is also a 700R4 but with speed density not MAF. My post build numbers were unbelievably low 244hp and 338tq at the wheels.

I spent 8 months obsessed with trying to locate the cause of my lost HP/TQ. Tore it down, checked everything, put it back together again. Back to the dyno. Threw parts at it. Back to the dyno. Tuned and re-tuned, back and forth to the dyno. Thoroughly pissed off, almost ready to give the car away in disgust, I moved on to the next mod. Swapping the 700R4 for a T5.

Unexpected results. With the T5 installed the dyno showed an increase to 289rwhp and 398rwtq. No other mods/changes.

What I concluded is in some way the combination of performance mods and 700R4 were incompatible. I never got to the bottom of it, never did figure out why, I did not care.

Not saying your 700R4 is your issue, just saying it was my issue and I never suspected it.

...
I'm sorry to say but that sounds like a terrible story, nevertheless I'm glad you shared it with me.

I'd definitely like to switch to a manual transmission in the future (hopefully sometime in the near future).
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2015 | 01:26 PM
  #57  
antman89iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 2
From: huntsville, al
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 6.8 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 9" Moser 3.50 True trac
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by palric
The build as you described it should produce much better numbers than you attained. I did a similar build with a '90 L98, it is also a 700r4 but with speed density not MAF. My post build numbers were unbelievably low 244hp and 338tq at the wheels.

I spent 8 months obsessed with trying to locate the cause of my lost HP/TQ. Tore it down, checked everything, put it back together again. Back to the dyno. Threw parts at it. Back to the dyno. Tuned and re-tuned, back and forth to the dyno. Thoroughly pissed off, almost ready to give the car away in disgust, I moved on to the next mod. Swapping the 700r4 for a T5.

Unexpected results. With the T5 installed the dyno showed an increase to 289rwhp and 398rwtq. No other mods/changes.

What I concluded is in some way the combination of performance mods and 7004r were incompatible. I never got to the bottom of it, never did figure out why, I did not care.

Not saying your 700r4 is your issue, just saying it was my issue and I never suspected it.

...
Keep in mine conditions and dyno settings. They make various corrections (temp humidity SAE etc) which affect the reported numbers. It could be incompetence or just simple error but a bad correction could make it go either way. Also, different types of dynos skew the numbers somewhat. Constant load vs inertia dynos would probably report different numbers for the same car in the same conditions. Try not to fixate on the number and cross check it with other measures such as gpro and drag speeds.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2015 | 11:30 AM
  #58  
GCrites80s's Avatar
Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 8
From: Columbus, OH
Car: '87 IROC-Z
Engine: TPI 5.7
Transmission: T-56
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Mustang-brand dynos can be real heartbreakers.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2015 | 09:49 PM
  #59  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by GCrites80s
Mustang-brand dynos can be real heartbreakers.
It was a Dynojet Dynometer...
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2015 | 10:00 PM
  #60  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Here are some photos of the passanger side ports, what do you guys think?
Attached Thumbnails TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-20151227_022923.jpg   TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-20151227_024309.jpg   TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-20151227_023001.jpg   TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-20151227_023227.jpg   TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-20151227_023028.jpg  

TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-20151227_023302.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2015 | 10:30 PM
  #61  
Kennerz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Car: 88 5.7 Iroc, 2000 SS
Engine: Vortec Hot cam TPI/LS1
Transmission: Pro-Built/T-56
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Pictures can't tell the whole story, but those look as good or better as any I've seen on this board over the last 15+yrs. Who did it? Based on your results you will drive me to pull apart my good running vortec set up and port the base. That seems to be the key to a TPI making any real power at all.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2015 | 10:34 AM
  #62  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

That end of the base was never the problem.
The head side of the base is where the restriction is.
Bring it by and I will measure it and tell you if it is good or not.
The narrow part is 1 1/2" - 2" inside the head side.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2016 | 10:38 AM
  #63  
TTOP350's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,221
Likes: 1,141
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

.....
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 12:28 PM
  #64  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Thank You for taking a look at it Don
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2016 | 02:12 PM
  #65  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

No problem, I wish I could have had better news for you tho.
At best is is 1.7 sq. in. on the head side, it is 2.3 or better on the runner side. it needs to be around 2.3 to flow upwards of 300 cfm.
A regular 4 barrel manifold flows around 320 so you need that much to make a TPI
make good power.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 01:45 AM
  #66  
Kennerz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Car: 88 5.7 Iroc, 2000 SS
Engine: Vortec Hot cam TPI/LS1
Transmission: Pro-Built/T-56
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Don, can a vortec base get there without welding or thin casting issues? Also can it be done with unported heads? Can you divulge how to measure properly/what we should be looking at? Even better a pic?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2016 | 11:07 AM
  #67  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

No way, it is a thin casting and is not much better than stock.

Using snap gauges, measure the head side opening 1"- 2" inside ...
width X height X .785 =sq.ins.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 01:11 AM
  #68  
Kennerz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Car: 88 5.7 Iroc, 2000 SS
Engine: Vortec Hot cam TPI/LS1
Transmission: Pro-Built/T-56
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Don, are there any gains to be had with the vortec base? Seems hard to get over 300whp in the real world with the vortec.


Is the only real way to big power a ported accel base, or a first with AFR's
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 10:35 AM
  #69  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Out of the box that manifold isn't much better than stock.
The real gain comes from the heads.

After mine was welded and ported with E-tec heads I got 370 to the rear wheels.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2016 | 01:12 AM
  #70  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by Kennerz
Don, are there any gains to be had with the vortec base? Seems hard to get over 300whp in the real world with the vortec.


Is the only real way to big power a ported accel base, or a first with AFR's


Kennerz, here's a link for you...

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tpi/...pi-intake.html
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2016 | 01:50 AM
  #71  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by Dyno Don
No problem, I wish I could have had better news for you tho.
At best is is 1.7 sq. in. on the head side, it is 2.3 or better on the runner side. it needs to be around 2.3 to flow upwards of 300 cfm.
A regular 4 barrel manifold flows around 320 so you need that much to make a TPI
make good power.

Don, am I reading this correctly? You ported the Voctec Base to 1.86 sq. in and it's 1.77 sq. in. stock?

Originally Posted by Dyno Don
I can hardly wait as well, the port size after I ported it was 1.86 sq. in.(was 1.77)
It will now be around 2.2 when finished.

Stock Vortec head is 1.76
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 12:06 PM
  #72  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
I've also sent a couple of parts out for polishing; gotta be sure she shines on the Dyno!
Here's the link to the thread

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/auto...-polished.html
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2016 | 12:07 PM
  #73  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

It's Official, Dyno Day 2016!

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/sout...ocal-dyno.html
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2016 | 03:53 PM
  #74  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Deja Vu to Dyno Day 2011. ECM didn't want to read out...

But,

I'm Happy!

312HP & 359TQ
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2016 | 08:05 PM
  #75  
aliceempire's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 177
From: Milwaukee
Car: 92 Firebird, 77 Trans Am SE, 86 Z28
Engine: 5.7 HSR, T/A 6.6, empty
Transmission: T-5, TH350, T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi, 3.23 posi, 3.23
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Nice. A 50hp gain is solid. Gotta graph to show?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 01:20 AM
  #76  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Thank You to Dyno Don & Kevin91Z!!

Much Obliged,
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 01:28 AM
  #77  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by aliceempire
Gotta graph to show?
Here you go...
Attached Thumbnails TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results-runfile_009.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2016 | 05:46 AM
  #78  
TTOP350's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,221
Likes: 1,141
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

So what ultimatly gave you the gains?
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 10:34 PM
  #79  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by TTOP350
So what ultimatly gave you the gains?
Not sure, too many different variables changed. Ported the TPIS Big Mouth Manifold, Switched to 30LBS Injectors, Switched to a TPIS 58MM Throttle Body and the Plenum also received a slight polishing job.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2016 | 11:05 PM
  #80  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

If you look at the graph you'll notice that the Air/Fuel Ratio is not ideal. We couldn't get anymore fuel into the engine. I replaced the fuel filter and it may have been clogged as it had a lot of debris and rust particles. Hopefully there's some untapped HP to be had there... The next modifications will be to add a Power Steering Pump, Upgrade to 1 3/4 Headers, Swap over to an Aluminum Driveshaft & NOS!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2016 | 10:31 AM
  #81  
RamIt's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 497
Likes: 4
From: El Sobrante, California
Car: 1984 z28
Engine: Crate replacement L31R 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 7.625" 28 spline 3.23
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Looking at the fuel curve I bet you have another 20 hp waiting for you.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2016 | 12:25 PM
  #82  
ray jr's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 65
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

im almost building your exact combo
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2016 | 01:04 PM
  #83  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by RamIt
Looking at the fuel curve I bet you have another 20 hp waiting for you.
I sure hope so
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2016 | 12:56 AM
  #84  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by ray jr
I'm almost building your exact combo
What are you doing differently?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2016 | 11:09 PM
  #85  
ray jr's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 65
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
What are you doing differently?
a little different cam and different headers .. same afr 180 heads , tpi big mouth intake and as&m runners .. who ported your tpi big mouth intake ?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2016 | 07:21 AM
  #86  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by ray jr
a little different cam and different headers .. same afr 180 heads , tpi big mouth intake and as&m runners .. who ported your tpi big mouth intake ?
I'm interested in hearing which cam your going to use. I sent it out to TPIS, albeit I was somewhat disappointed in that they didn't flow all of the ports and I don't know which ports they actually flowed. See Post #52.

My biggest gripe has to be the total cost as it wasn't cheap.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2016 | 08:46 AM
  #87  
antman89iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 2
From: huntsville, al
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 6.8 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 9" Moser 3.50 True trac
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
If you look at the graph you'll notice that the Air/Fuel Ratio is not ideal. We couldn't get anymore fuel into the engine. I replaced the fuel filter and it may have been clogged as it had a lot of debris and rust particles. Hopefully there's some untapped HP to be had there... The next modifications will be to add a Power Steering Pump, Upgrade to 1 3/4 Headers, Swap over to an Aluminum Driveshaft & NOS!
less than ideal? I'd say you're very lean. I would start at 12-12.5 and lean it out from there. When you say you couldn't get anymore fuel into the engine what do you mean? Were the injectors at 100% and do you know what the fuel pressure was holding?

Does it run this lean when on the road? I ask because with my Camaro I think the ram air on the road would lean it out slightly so I would keep it a little rich on the dyno.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2016 | 10:04 PM
  #88  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by antman89iroc
less than ideal? I'd say you're very lean. I would start at 12-12.5 and lean it out from there. When you say you couldn't get anymore fuel into the engine what do you mean? Were the injectors at 100% and do you know what the fuel pressure was holding?

Does it run this lean when on the road? I ask because with my Camaro I think the ram air on the road would lean it out slightly so I would keep it a little rich on the dyno.
The ECM was not reading out so we tuned the car with the O2 Sensor from the Dynometer. Since we were not connected to the ECM we could not see if the injectors were static (100%). I did not have a fuel pressure gauge connected. The car hasn't been tuned for the street yet so it runs like crap...
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 09:25 AM
  #89  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Picked up a set of Doug Thorley Tri Y Headers!

The��to 400lbs Torque!!!
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 11:00 AM
  #90  
prossi's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 197
Likes: 10
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

I saw previously in the thread you might go NOS. I have a real nice dry kit for sale complete with remote bottle opener, vent tube, autometer pressure gauge, aluminium bottle mounts and purge kit. PM me if interested
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2016 | 11:19 AM
  #91  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
Picked up a set of Doug Thorley Tri Y Headers!

The��to 400lbs Torque!!!
I guess I can sell the ones I have been saving for you then
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2016 | 01:18 AM
  #92  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by Dyno Don
I guess I can sell the ones I have been saving for you then
Don, I've been trying to save $$$ for a set of Dyno Don Headers but it's been tough....
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2016 | 07:56 AM
  #93  
antman89iroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 2
From: huntsville, al
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 6.8 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 9" Moser 3.50 True trac
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
The ECM was not reading out so we tuned the car with the O2 Sensor from the Dynometer. Since we were not connected to the ECM we could not see if the injectors were static (100%). I did not have a fuel pressure gauge connected. The car hasn't been tuned for the street yet so it runs like crap...
So were you adjusting fuel pressure? did you ever get this straightened out?

PS Dyno Don, what headers do you have available? You can post or PM me. I am currently running Hooker shortys at 1 5/8 OD and believe I may benefit from larger OD and longer lengths. I'm concerned about road clearance with full length headers so a mid length would be great and the reason I haven't gone with that style. Also, I am running the exhaust back next to the trans so the drivers side kicking into the oil pan for the stock route isn't desired. Sorry for the hi-jack.
Reply
Old Nov 20, 2016 | 07:46 AM
  #94  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by antman89iroc
So were you adjusting fuel pressure? did you ever get this straightened out?
No adjustment was made to the Fuel Pressure. I believe the fuel filter was clogged but that hasn't been confirmed. I need to set up a tuning session with KEVIN91Z

Originally Posted by antman89iroc
Sorry for the hi-jack.
You and the guy trying to sell me some NOS (Post #90)
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2018 | 11:43 PM
  #95  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Originally Posted by SixSeriesCSi
Picked up a set of Doug Thorley Tri Y Headers!

The��to 400lbs Torque!!!
Turns outs the Doug Thorley Tri Y Headers #375Y, I bought are for other applications and won’t fit.

Wish I would of verified prior to sending them out for Ceramic Coating.

Reply
Old Mar 11, 2018 | 05:14 PM
  #96  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Dyno Day 2018 - March 24th

Really Hoping for 40+ HP/TQ

Power-Steering ✔

Aluminum Driveshaft needs a Transmission Yoke & 1 3/4" Headers need to be installed...

I'd like to do some wide-band tuning prior to hitting the rollers too.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2018 | 11:51 AM
  #97  
Ed1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 19
From: Westminster, MD USA
Car: 91 Firebird 'vert, 91 Formula
Engine: 5.7, 5.0
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: Auburn w/ 3.73's, 3.42
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Sub'd
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2018 | 11:30 AM
  #98  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Bought a Summit Racing Aluminum Driveshaft (Made by Sonnax). No time to send the Original (RPO Code JG1) out for service.

Aluminum Driveshaft ✔

Thank-You to Kevin91Z for the Street Tune on Sat.

Splurging on 110 Octane & GP1 Package from Moates for a “110 Octane Track Chip”.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2018 | 09:26 AM
  #99  
SixSeriesCSi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 863
Likes: 33
From: Bellflower, CA
Car: 89 Formula, 85 Trans AM & 91 Bird
Engine: 5.0 CARB, 5.7L TPI & 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5/700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt & 10 Bolt X2
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

Well, I'm still in disbelief

I made substantially less power!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2018 | 09:40 AM
  #100  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: TPI Combo - Low Dyno Results

You dont need 110 oct and i can see that making less
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56 AM.