Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I put a ZZ3HO motor in my 89 IROCZ and put my stock TPI on it I had a 305 I was able to get a 89 Corvette manifold up TPI and distributor is this an upgrade?
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
The Corvette also has aluminum heads, and the tuning is a bit hotter due to this. You factory 305TPI tuning isn't going to agree well with a larger motor, higher lift Cam, and larger injectors. Being that 89 was still MAF, you will probably get away with it as far as it should run and operate, but you will need some tuning to get the power out of it. However, the ZZ3 Cam is a good match overall to the TPI manifold and you now have aluminum heads. Should be a fun combo, but do think you will need a custom PROM to really tap into the extra performance.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,907
Likes: 1,014
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
opps wrong plug
Last edited by Tuned Performance; Sep 27, 2019 at 06:18 PM.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 27
From: Sanctuary state
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
dist and intake wont give you any more power the vette L98 wasnt anything special
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 89
From: Temecula, CA
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 3.27 Posi
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
As stated, the "TPI" portion of the Vette is the same as any 305 or 350 camaro/bird. The injectors will differ between engine sizes (22lb for 350, 19lb for 305) and that's about it. Same throttle body, etc. Difference is lower manifold won't have internal EGR provisions and be setup for external EGR.
The vette's engine has aluminum heads, that's where the difference mostly is, not on the intake side.
The vette's engine has aluminum heads, that's where the difference mostly is, not on the intake side.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 89
From: Temecula, CA
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 3.27 Posi
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
2) https://www.google.com/search?client...th+ram+install
It is absolutely amazing what a simple Google search can turn-up. It's the absolute fastest way to search the decade+ of information here.
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Yea and there is no direct answer you could search for 3 days and find a 100 different answers from people who have never installed 1 every other person say you need to tune it some say you dont I am looking for someone that can tell me the experience they have had so any discussion with intakes doesnt seem far off the subject I would think maybe you should stop trolling to complain why would you be sitting here answering back in 1 minute do you have anything else to do on a Sunday afternoon
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 89
From: Temecula, CA
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 3.27 Posi
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Yea and there is no direct answer you could search for 3 days and find a 100 different answers from people who have never installed 1 every other person say you need to tune it some say you dont I am looking for someone that can tell me the experience they have had so any discussion with intakes doesnt seem far off the subject I would think maybe you should stop trolling to complain why would you be sitting here answering back in 1 minute do you have anything else to do on a Sunday afternoon
1) you posted in an unrelated thread
2) I did the work for you, and linked you to literally a ton of threads with tons of information.
God forbid you lift a finger and read the information that was presented. You don't need someone to come in and hold your hand. Just read the g'd existing posts. It's not rocket science guy. You aren't making a Lunar lander here.
And if you change anything major on your engine, yes, you'd want to tune it. That goes with any change that will lead to notably more air or fuel needed...
Last edited by thtanner; Sep 29, 2019 at 11:42 AM.
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
1.Still trolling
2.panties are now in a bunch
3.intake questions are not related?
4.must not have a life if your here on a sunday afternoon worrying about something so petty
2.panties are now in a bunch
3.intake questions are not related?
4.must not have a life if your here on a sunday afternoon worrying about something so petty
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 89
From: Temecula, CA
Car: 1989 Pontiac Formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BorgWarner 3.27 Posi
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
seriously dude why not start your own thread on the subject instead of posting in someone else's .. you may get more help
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Yes, because most likely if someone has reached the point where they are installing one of these manifolds and making such investment there are other things that have be done with heads/cam/headers/displacement etc. Maybe you don't understand that you have actually found your answer... there is no one size fits all answer on this topic... and tbh there is not.
See above
Welcome to the internet. I don't know what to tell you, but expect all kinds of different answers from all kinds of different people. This platform (TPI) is almost 35 years old. A lot of us have been around through those years and on these boards for near 25. People have seen a lot, heard a lot, and done a lot. Additionally there is a wealth of engineering knowledge on this board that understand what 2 different parts or certain parts are supposed to do or how they are supposed to function. Not everyone has to install something to have knowledge on the subject.
You need to tune it to get the most out of it period. Again, refer to my first statement. This is not an inexpensive modification. What kind of performance increase are you looking for? Something worth the $1000+ you paid for that manifold? It dang well better be changing things enough that I need to tune it or I dare to say it's not worth it. Will it run without a Tune? Probably. Will it make more power? Maybe... Will it be optimized? Not without a Tune. With the short runner style manifolds you are changing the complete breathing characteristics of the engine.
Yes, there is certain experience of how did you reach this, what tool did you use to do that kind of information only someone who has actually done it can have and would be completely irrelevant to the original thread if that is what you are looking for.
You wanted quick responses. Seriously, what you are trying to ask has nothing to do with the differences between two factory intake manifolds are.
See above
Welcome to the internet. I don't know what to tell you, but expect all kinds of different answers from all kinds of different people. This platform (TPI) is almost 35 years old. A lot of us have been around through those years and on these boards for near 25. People have seen a lot, heard a lot, and done a lot. Additionally there is a wealth of engineering knowledge on this board that understand what 2 different parts or certain parts are supposed to do or how they are supposed to function. Not everyone has to install something to have knowledge on the subject.
You need to tune it to get the most out of it period. Again, refer to my first statement. This is not an inexpensive modification. What kind of performance increase are you looking for? Something worth the $1000+ you paid for that manifold? It dang well better be changing things enough that I need to tune it or I dare to say it's not worth it. Will it run without a Tune? Probably. Will it make more power? Maybe... Will it be optimized? Not without a Tune. With the short runner style manifolds you are changing the complete breathing characteristics of the engine.
You wanted quick responses. Seriously, what you are trying to ask has nothing to do with the differences between two factory intake manifolds are. Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I paid 424 for the intake was debating using it and if it is even worth the money i think i will just stick with my stock ive had this car for 20 years now have been happy with it but need to do some top end work thought i would just upgrade but really it ran fine for me power wise an i like the stock tpi look any way so i guess ill just sell it
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I am still waiting for the OP to confirm if his ZZ3 has angled plug aluminum heads.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Sorry, I was thinking about a Different Ram manifold, heck a set of TPIS or AS&M Runners are going in the $500 range. Still, changing the runner length on the TPI is going to change it's breathing characteristics. You will want the tune adjusted in certain areas to optimize.
If that pic you posted is of your car, looks like you already have SLP Runners.
If that pic you posted is of your car, looks like you already have SLP Runners.
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
yea they are slp runners this car from the dealer with slp runners exhaust and a cold air intake ive had it for 20 years i am the 2nd owner i was going to put a stealthram on it but i am gonna keep the way it is
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Does it also have a "ECM Calibrator" as part of that package? If so, that is a custom tune they developed off their modifications.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 1,158
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 1,158
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Great... Dyno graphs, Timeslips?
SLP has been a pretty reputable company along with TPIS supporting the F-Body platform over the years. While I have no experience directly with their chips in my car to say... but that's a pretty stout claim to call on SLP. Especially since they were delivered at the dealer with the PROM and warrantied against running issues for 36K miles.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 1,158
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Great... Dyno graphs, Timeslips?
SLP has been a pretty reputable company along with TPIS supporting the F-Body platform over the years. While I have no experience directly with their chips in my car to say... but that's a pretty stout claim to call on SLP. Especially since they were delivered at the dealer with the PROM and warrantied against running issues for 36K miles.
SLP has been a pretty reputable company along with TPIS supporting the F-Body platform over the years. While I have no experience directly with their chips in my car to say... but that's a pretty stout claim to call on SLP. Especially since they were delivered at the dealer with the PROM and warrantied against running issues for 36K miles.
Pretty much all of the ink on my time slips from the early 90s to mid 2000s have faded away.
The chips are not a lot better than the factory, a few degs of timing and dash of fuel here and there from what I'm told by guys that have looked at them side by side with factory tunes. (I'm not a chip tuner at all) Driveability (esp on the 91-2 firehawk) for some reason wasn't the best either. Poke around on here and you may find a few threads about their chips (and other aftermarket ones too).
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,907
Likes: 1,014
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I have looked at several slp tunes. A comparison The slp 40054 only changes knock retard in power enrichment.
Not that great of a tune over stock aujp.
Not that great of a tune over stock aujp.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Again, I would say they had to be conservative being that it still came with a warranty when you picked it up from a dealer. I would be more interested (in the spirit of this thread) to see what their tune was for the T-ram that altered the runner length more significantly, like the HSR.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I had the SLP cam, runners, and port matched (not completely ported manifold) on a 355 back in an 86 Trans Am. It was done at about 5200 RPM.- being generous. The Siamesed runners don't take that much length out of the intake track. It's just simple physics.
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I think im around 55 5600 but im just kinda settling down just more of a cruiser now, it's currently in the paint shop was factory white with grey interior now its ice pearl white with black interior the original seats are getting redone in black leather just giving it a face lift updating the tunes too
I was going to make it a 383 with a stealth ram
I was going to make it a 383 with a stealth ram
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
I think im around 55 5600 but im just kinda settling down just more of a cruiser now, it's currently in the paint shop was factory white with grey interior now its ice pearl white with black interior the original seats are getting redone in black leather just giving it a face lift updating the tunes too
I was going to make it a 383 with a stealth ram
I was going to make it a 383 with a stealth ram
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,231
Likes: 1,158
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Wish I had seat time in a Firehawk to know. I wouldn't expect them to be radically different than stock either. With the bolt on changes they are making I wouldn't think it would be something that would require major changes. SLP had a cam for the TPI, but I don't think they ever included it as part of the package. Probably couldn't get it passed emissions.
Again, I would say they had to be conservative being that it still came with a warranty when you picked it up from a dealer. I would be more interested (in the spirit of this thread) to see what their tune was for the T-ram that altered the runner length more significantly, like the HSR.
Again, I would say they had to be conservative being that it still came with a warranty when you picked it up from a dealer. I would be more interested (in the spirit of this thread) to see what their tune was for the T-ram that altered the runner length more significantly, like the HSR.
SLP offered 3 roller cams. I've put the wrong part number (50006 on one instead of 51006). the 2 smaller cams, 51002 and 51006, were 49 state legal iirc, I'll check my old catalogs and update
The T-rams runners are 11.5" long but ports are larger and way more plenum volume to draw from.
Last edited by TTOP350; Oct 3, 2019 at 02:22 PM.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 768
Likes: 32
From: Lansing, MI
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Difference between 89 Vette and 89 IROCZ TPI
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drttrk355
Camaros Wanted
1
Jul 29, 2006 05:57 PM










