This is from the FAQ page on this site:

It states a 58 ft lb increase with just this $50 part. The table disagrees and reads a 77.5 ft lb maximum increase. This information seems a bit suspect. Where did these #'s come from and can anyone confirm them? I am going to bolt one of these up, along with a host of other goodies, the weekend after next when the roc comes out of storage. What type of real world increase can I expect to feel?

 

Sorry-looks like the table got funked up a little, I think you guys can figure it out though...

Thanks

 

hehehe that part of the FAQ was probably stolen from another site way back when. As for where the numbers came from, probably TPIS.

 

depends on engine. my 350 with the 19lbs/hr injectors i had set at 52psi. at the dyno day i just went to i needed to bring it down to 43psi and i picked up 5 hp off that.

 

Just like an AirFoil adds 15+HP
I've heard you acen get 5-10HP out of an AFPR.

 

An AFPR is simply a rough tuning tool. Nothing more, nothing less. Could you potentially pick up a couple tenths w/ one. Yes if you know what you are doing and actually TnT rather than put it on, bump it up and forget it.

 

Like they always say "lean is mean"

 

If you look at the chart closely below you'll notice
that the 58 ft lbs is a peak TQ value difference. Look at the blue highlighed areas below.

Stock#s @4500RPM peak TQ 253.5 TQ 217.2 HP

46psi/FP @3250RPM peak TQ 311.3/77.5 TQ 192.6/47.9 HP

The difference between 253.5 TQ and 311.3 TQ is 57.8 or rounded of to 58 ft lb.

Yes, this is from TPIS's Insiders Hints book.

I personally did'nt notice a 60 Ft Lb of torque difference. Maybe 20ft lbs of TQ at best. It seems that this was another attempt by TPIS to sell parts with exaggerated claims. -I would love to go from my stock HP @ 230 to 249 and go from 320 TQ to 380 TQ. That would be the best bang for the buck mod out there if it were true.

https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/faq/thirdgen.shtml

<FONT COLOR="red"><pre>
42 PSI (stock) 46 PSI 50 PSI
RPM Torq HP Torq/diff HP/diff Torq/diff HP/diff
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2250 237.7 101.8 254.9/17.2 109.2/ 7.4 275.0/37.3 117.8/16.0
2500 241.7 115.1 262.1/20.4 124.8/ 9.7 283.3/41.6 134.9/19.8
2750 241.5 126.5 275.2/33.7 144.1/17.6 297.0/55.5 155.5/29.0
3000 237.1 135.4 278.2/41.1 158.9/23.5 305.5/68.4 174.5/39.1
<font color="#0000FF">3250</font> 233.8 144.7 278.9/45.1 172.6/27.9 <font color="#0000FF">311.3/77.5 192.6/47.9</font>
3500 241.0 160.6 278.2/37.2 185.4/24.8 309.5/68.5 206.3/45.7
3750 246.6 176.1 283.4/36.8 202.4/26.8 303.3/56.7 216.6/40.5
4000 250.4 190.7 278.3/27.9 212.0/21.3 298.0/47.6 227.0/36.3
4250 251.6 203.6 272.5/20.9 220.5/16.9 289.1/37.5 233.9/30.3
<font color="#0000FF">4500 253.5 217.2</font> 257.3/ 4.2 220.5/ 3.3 277.0/23.5 237.3/20.1
4750 245.0 221.6 242.1/-2.9 219.0/-2.6 266.4/21.4 240.9/19.3
5000 227.6 216.7 225.0/-1.4 214.2/-2.5 237.8/10.2 226.4/ 9.7
</pre></font>
.

.

 

i looked over my dyno run. i also picked up 16 ft/lbs of torque throughout the rpm range.

 

It's all dependent on how far off you are too begin with. Will it replace a properly tuned chip, NO. But it can help you out in between chips if you don't burn your own. Mrr23 picked up 15 ftlbs, I picked up 10 hp and 15 ftlbs at the peaks. There were ploaces I picked up 40 ftlbs, but the initial a/f was way off. So basically if your tuneing is perfect, you will see no gains. But if your off, or the original regulator is off, then yes you can see huge gains.

 

.
well had to bring it back up to 49psi. either the wideband o2 was reading wrong or the tech was wrong about threadings. took it to www.vincihiperformance.com they have a dynojet and was was wanting to compare the differences. i ran my codes and got lean exhaust. made 5 runs and figured out 49 psi was best.

www.fl-thirdgen.org/mrr23-dynosheet.html

here are the differences.