LS vs LT1 swap
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 98
Likes: 5
From: Pittsboro, NC
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
LS vs LT1 swap
Shorter back story: The car is a 1984 Camaro Z28 that had the 305 HO and has the T5. I blew the engine, pulled and sold it, but still have the T5.
I have a 2000 Silverado with a 5.3 that we are pulling and replacing with a 6.0. We upgraded the cam, springs, seal, gaskets, rings, and bearings, which ran about $1400. Then headers added a couple hundred, but wiring and accessories were already present, and the intake is already there as well. And tbh, I really enjoyed tearing down and rebuilding the 6.0, and would not mind doing this again.
So now I have a 5.3. But if I spend another $1400 for the same parts as above, but also need an oil pan, motor mounts, wiring, fuel pump, water pump, accessory bracket, headers, and have no chance for A/C, that will add another $1500-$2000.
On FB marketplace there is a 93 LT1 engine from a Corvette, 4 bolt main, including starter, standalone engine harness, fuse panel, pre-programmed ECU. VATS, downstream O2,, EGR, and all unnecessary sensor data has been removed. Comes with a Camaro harmonic balancer, accessory bracket, PS pump, alternator, and AC delete pulley. Also has Flowtech shorty headers. He's asking $1800 for the engine and some extra cash for the headers.
How difficult would putting the LT1 in? This is not anything I considered, as my original plan was using the 5.3 that I have vs just replacing the 305 with a 305 SBC.
So I have not researched this swap at all, and have no idea what all would be involved.
I have a 2000 Silverado with a 5.3 that we are pulling and replacing with a 6.0. We upgraded the cam, springs, seal, gaskets, rings, and bearings, which ran about $1400. Then headers added a couple hundred, but wiring and accessories were already present, and the intake is already there as well. And tbh, I really enjoyed tearing down and rebuilding the 6.0, and would not mind doing this again.
So now I have a 5.3. But if I spend another $1400 for the same parts as above, but also need an oil pan, motor mounts, wiring, fuel pump, water pump, accessory bracket, headers, and have no chance for A/C, that will add another $1500-$2000.
On FB marketplace there is a 93 LT1 engine from a Corvette, 4 bolt main, including starter, standalone engine harness, fuse panel, pre-programmed ECU. VATS, downstream O2,, EGR, and all unnecessary sensor data has been removed. Comes with a Camaro harmonic balancer, accessory bracket, PS pump, alternator, and AC delete pulley. Also has Flowtech shorty headers. He's asking $1800 for the engine and some extra cash for the headers.
How difficult would putting the LT1 in? This is not anything I considered, as my original plan was using the 5.3 that I have vs just replacing the 305 with a 305 SBC.
So I have not researched this swap at all, and have no idea what all would be involved.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
Although the LT1 is more bolt in friendly and can basically use everything mechanical that supported the 305 I would go 5.3. However, if you don't want to deal with exhaust, front accessories, etc, than I would look at a traditional small block swap. There is nothing special about the LT1 other than it has a funky coolant system and the ignition system is a sub-optimal design.
Before you do anything, spend some time reading the stickies at the top of the LS/LT swap forum. You'll start to see what you need to consider and can judge if its something you want to tackle or not. Plus, reading is free, and you're money will be better spent with some knowledge in your dome.
Practicality of swap. Headaches vs benefits.
5.3 > LT1
SBC > LT1
Before you do anything, spend some time reading the stickies at the top of the LS/LT swap forum. You'll start to see what you need to consider and can judge if its something you want to tackle or not. Plus, reading is free, and you're money will be better spent with some knowledge in your dome.
Practicality of swap. Headaches vs benefits.
5.3 > LT1
SBC > LT1
Supreme Member




Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 785
From: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 98
Likes: 5
From: Pittsboro, NC
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
Last silly question for a bit. And TBH, I always have a hard time making decisions, so thank you for your patience with me!
93 Buick Roadmaster engine is not an LT1 (from what I understand). One is on FB for $600.
My goal is still about 300hp to the wheels. I still have the intake and carb from the 305. Could I not take this 93, use the carb and intake, mild cam, new springs, rings, gaskets, and get about 300 out of it? This would be easier technically than wiring, mounts, fuel pump, etc that would be needed for the LS that will eventually be out of my truck. Still gonna use the T5 that I have
93 Buick Roadmaster engine is not an LT1 (from what I understand). One is on FB for $600.
My goal is still about 300hp to the wheels. I still have the intake and carb from the 305. Could I not take this 93, use the carb and intake, mild cam, new springs, rings, gaskets, and get about 300 out of it? This would be easier technically than wiring, mounts, fuel pump, etc that would be needed for the LS that will eventually be out of my truck. Still gonna use the T5 that I have
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 340
From: CT
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone w a torquestorm blower
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
I agree the LT1 is not a good option due to the weird electronics. The 5.3 is a good swap and can be made to work w a t5 but will take a little work/$ to bolt up to everything. The road master engine is a tbi 350. That is easy enough to get to get 350 hp w a cam, heads and intake. All the stuff you had on the 305 will fit and you'll be up and running quickly. The 5.3 should be really easy to get more hp out of but the swap is slightly more challenging. I assume you're using a carb with either engine. If going efi, theres a bunch more to consider.
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 98
Likes: 5
From: Pittsboro, NC
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
If we continue with the LS, we would likely do fuel injection but then would need an intake, fuel pump, re-routed fuel lines, so certainly more work. While I know better fuel economy, easier tuning, easier startup with LS. But I have the intake and carb from the 305, and just like the idea of keeping things old school, so am perfectly fine staying carbed. My son disagrees! 😄
I'm sure if indig deeper I could find it, but are there heads for the 350 to really look for or to avoid?
I'm sure if indig deeper I could find it, but are there heads for the 350 to really look for or to avoid?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,748
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
If we continue with the LS, we would likely do fuel injection but then would need an intake, fuel pump, re-routed fuel lines, so certainly more work. While I know better fuel economy, easier tuning, easier startup with LS. But I have the intake and carb from the 305, and just like the idea of keeping things old school, so am perfectly fine staying carbed. My son disagrees! 😄
I'm sure if indig deeper I could find it, but are there heads for the 350 to really look for or to avoid?
I'm sure if indig deeper I could find it, but are there heads for the 350 to really look for or to avoid?
Trending Topics
Senior Member




Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 783
Likes: 206
From: az
Car: 91 WS6 GTA
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
if it were me, and i was looking for engine swap ideas, i surely would not chose 45 year old SBC technology.
Ls all the way.
Everything about the LS is better then the SBC in nearly every way.
you can have 400 hp with a cam swap, and still get 20+ MPGs with the ac on
SBC wont do that.
Zero wrong with a SBC, but again old tech. The only thing you have to modify is the fuel system, and its pretty easy to do
Ls all the way.
Everything about the LS is better then the SBC in nearly every way.
you can have 400 hp with a cam swap, and still get 20+ MPGs with the ac on
SBC wont do that.
Zero wrong with a SBC, but again old tech. The only thing you have to modify is the fuel system, and its pretty easy to do
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 340
From: CT
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone w a torquestorm blower
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
A set of l98 heads would work awesome w a nice little cam. It would make for a nice torquey engine. If you used those heads w a zz4 cam you'd be in the 350 hp/400tq range. Not a high flowing/revving setup but fun/stable and reasonable in price. Thats probably the ball park you'd be in w some simple mods on that 5.3 w less work!
the whole LS thing is cool but will be more money in. I cant see doing an LS w a carb. You need a whole new fuel system so new fuel lines/sender and in tank pump. So why not go for efi!
i have an 82 that has a efi 350 w a supercharger. It initally had the same drivetrain as your car. I put a zz4 in it w the t5 years 25 ago. It was a blast. Then I wanted more and more. Think about your end goal. You want a 350 hp fun car? You want 550hp? You build up a gnarly LS, you're gonna need a better trans and rear.
how deep do you wanna get!?!
i will say, my 350hp and then 430hp setup and then 560hp setup all were the same speed on the road in a way. You really cant easily open up a car that fast on most public roads. My car is fast as hell and on occasion i get to use the power, but its not often. So i get to say i have X amount of HP and have cool guy blower whine. Do i get to use it all, not much at all. But its all relative. I have a friend w a 900hp street nova and another friend w a street 2000hp mustang.
so how deep do you wanna get?
the whole LS thing is cool but will be more money in. I cant see doing an LS w a carb. You need a whole new fuel system so new fuel lines/sender and in tank pump. So why not go for efi!
i have an 82 that has a efi 350 w a supercharger. It initally had the same drivetrain as your car. I put a zz4 in it w the t5 years 25 ago. It was a blast. Then I wanted more and more. Think about your end goal. You want a 350 hp fun car? You want 550hp? You build up a gnarly LS, you're gonna need a better trans and rear.
how deep do you wanna get!?!
i will say, my 350hp and then 430hp setup and then 560hp setup all were the same speed on the road in a way. You really cant easily open up a car that fast on most public roads. My car is fast as hell and on occasion i get to use the power, but its not often. So i get to say i have X amount of HP and have cool guy blower whine. Do i get to use it all, not much at all. But its all relative. I have a friend w a 900hp street nova and another friend w a street 2000hp mustang.
so how deep do you wanna get?
Last edited by Firechicken82; Apr 16, 2026 at 04:47 PM.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
LS all the way as said. SBC is old. LT1 is technically SBC when you get down to it. Same limitations stemming from the block. Slightly better heads, arguably better intake overall, but not better than a SuperRam.
LS 5.3 will make more power everywhere. Newer computer, better tuning support. Will tolerate larger cams while retaining drivability because of that better computer. Much MUCH better head design, way more efficient. Better intakes. Way more mod potential. Block will handle much more power on stock internals...etc.
LS kicks the crap out of SBC and for good reason. GM took everything they learned over 50 years and put it into a clean sheet design on the LS.
And in today's world, the LS is easily supported as a swap in the aftermarket with little to no drawbacks.
Swap in a 5.3 now. Easy to move to a 6.2 LS3 later. Want boost? Can put a magna style supercharger right on top and fit under the OEM hood.
LS 5.3 will make more power everywhere. Newer computer, better tuning support. Will tolerate larger cams while retaining drivability because of that better computer. Much MUCH better head design, way more efficient. Better intakes. Way more mod potential. Block will handle much more power on stock internals...etc.
LS kicks the crap out of SBC and for good reason. GM took everything they learned over 50 years and put it into a clean sheet design on the LS.
And in today's world, the LS is easily supported as a swap in the aftermarket with little to no drawbacks.
Swap in a 5.3 now. Easy to move to a 6.2 LS3 later. Want boost? Can put a magna style supercharger right on top and fit under the OEM hood.
Senior Member




Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 783
Likes: 206
From: az
Car: 91 WS6 GTA
Engine: 5.3
Transmission: 4l60e
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
i know i 'preach' the Ls swap all the time. Yes it can cost more due to things needed, but, there is a reason it is the number 1 engine swapped in todays world.
dont get me wrong, i love old iron, i have a 383 and a 496, but ill tell you from experience, the Ls just runs better.
But it all comes down to what the person paying for it can do or needs help doing.
The SBC might be the easiest way to go for him.
dont get me wrong, i love old iron, i have a 383 and a 496, but ill tell you from experience, the Ls just runs better.
But it all comes down to what the person paying for it can do or needs help doing.
The SBC might be the easiest way to go for him.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
i know i 'preach' the Ls swap all the time. Yes it can cost more due to things needed, but, there is a reason it is the number 1 engine swapped in todays world.
dont get me wrong, i love old iron, i have a 383 and a 496, but ill tell you from experience, the Ls just runs better.
But it all comes down to what the person paying for it can do or needs help doing.
The SBC might be the easiest way to go for him.
dont get me wrong, i love old iron, i have a 383 and a 496, but ill tell you from experience, the Ls just runs better.
But it all comes down to what the person paying for it can do or needs help doing.
The SBC might be the easiest way to go for him.
Thread Starter
Junior Member

Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 98
Likes: 5
From: Pittsboro, NC
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
I've read the sticky a million times, read the RB groups, etc. on the LS swap, and I have the ability and tools to rebuild the engine. What I have not found in my research is more about the "little things" since I am keeping with the T5. Everything talks about going to a T56 or using the 4L60E. Can I keep the same crossmember and driveshaft with the LS? Will I need to move the pedals at all? I'm not going with a/c since I don't want to buy a tubular k-member and can't notch the stock one, but do I need to notch/bend/beat it for room for the oil pan? How hard is it to get proper engine mounts? I can use an inline electric fuel pump rather than replacing the entire tank, but will need to re-route the fuel lines a little since they come into mid-passenger side on the 305 but top driver side on the LS. Not to mention needing a standalone harness (I have the harness from the 6.0, but it was cut at the level of the computer).
These are the things that make me cautious about the swap. I don't have the ability or the courage to fabricate things. If I can't buy it, I likely can't do it.
Am I over-reacting? Likely. Will I look back and feel silly? Likely. Unless the car turns into a giant paperweight in my shop...
These are the things that make me cautious about the swap. I don't have the ability or the courage to fabricate things. If I can't buy it, I likely can't do it.
Am I over-reacting? Likely. Will I look back and feel silly? Likely. Unless the car turns into a giant paperweight in my shop...
Supreme Member

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 340
From: CT
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone w a torquestorm blower
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: LS vs LT1 swap
Getting the ls hooked up to the t5 at the proper 17deg angle may be tough. Look at three pedals .com also look at quick time bellhousings. You need an adaptor bellhousing or an adaptor plate. Also, most older truck ls engines aren't drilled for a pilot bearing. There are jigs to help w that but its a deal. Most LS mounts place it in the same spot as a regular sbc. I totally disagree w the comment about not putting money into a SBC. If its the path or least resistance its a good move.
Moving fuel lines is easy. Inline pumps run hotter and burn out much faster. The in tank units are cooled by the fuel.
Moving fuel lines is easy. Inline pumps run hotter and burn out much faster. The in tank units are cooled by the fuel.
Supreme Member




Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 785
From: 212 is up in this Bit@#
Car: Resto-Mod 1987 IROC-Z Clone
Engine: Alky fed L92 Vortec Twin-Turbo 6.8L
Transmission: My own built/ design 4L80M
Axle/Gears: Custom 12 bolt (4.10:1)
Re: LS vs LT1 swap

GM took "Most of Everything" that they learned from over all that time for sure!
Definitely not a "clean sheet design" though.
Many of the improvements found in the Gen III/ Gen IV Small Block Chevy can been seen well before it, earlier on in the Buick FWD 3800 V6 Engines and some small improvements in the Vortec Gen I Small Block Chevy V8 and V6.
If not for the advancements made for the Buick V6 Engines, the Gen III/ Gen IV Small Block Chevy would have been very different engines.

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dark Ember
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Jul 30, 2010 02:44 PM






