Hurst Billet Plus or B&M ripper for T-5?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Kona, Hawaii / Redlands, CA
Car: 91' RS
Engine: Built 355
Transmission: Probuilt 700r4
Hurst Billet Plus or B&M ripper for T-5?
Would like to know if these are essentially the same or if one has more perks to it than the other.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,519
Likes: 18
From: Fort Myers, FL
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 6.0
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I have the hurst in my 92 Formula, and the B&M in my 91 Z28 and really prefer the hurst to the B&M. It is much more predictable and easy to manuaver into the right gear. Shorter throw too.
Don't get me wrong, the B&M is a nice piece, and a vast improvement over the stock shifter, but I prefer the hurst.
Don't get me wrong, the B&M is a nice piece, and a vast improvement over the stock shifter, but I prefer the hurst.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
out of those two i prefer the hurst.
but in my car i have the pro5.0, and REALLY like it. i have used all 3 of them, and the hurst and pro50 are much better than the B&M IMHO. the hurst is great, but nothing beats the 2-3 shift of the pro5.0
but in my car i have the pro5.0, and REALLY like it. i have used all 3 of them, and the hurst and pro50 are much better than the B&M IMHO. the hurst is great, but nothing beats the 2-3 shift of the pro5.0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stangski09
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Nov 14, 2015 01:27 PM
school boy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 22, 2015 11:47 AM
