Transmission to the back?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Europe
Car: 98 T/A
Engine: ls1
Transmission to the back?
I was wondering if anyone tried or thought of moving the transmission to the back of a car?
I think C5 has it this way: an engine, drive shaft, tranny and then rear end.
This is a great move towards perfect weight distribution but question is if it can be done in our cars.
Anyone? thoughts? ideas? possible problems?
P.S. I hope this topic wasn't beat to death B4
I think C5 has it this way: an engine, drive shaft, tranny and then rear end.
This is a great move towards perfect weight distribution but question is if it can be done in our cars.
Anyone? thoughts? ideas? possible problems?
P.S. I hope this topic wasn't beat to death B4
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
ive seen a picture somewhere of a purple thirdgen with a C4 independent rear. i have no idea what it took to pull that off.
probably a re-located fuel cell.
probably a re-located fuel cell.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
How much money do you have? Anything can be done, but the cost involved in this type of radical surgery is going to be extreemely expensive to ensure that the car is "rigth" after all the work is done. Basically you are talking about completely re-engineering the rear half of the car. All the suspension pickup points need to be researched and properly reinforced. A ton of fabrication is involved. The C5 transaxel and suspension is going to set you back a pretty penny too.
I'd rather go with aluminum heads, a fiberglass hood, and other front end lightening components to reach the 50/50 weight split. Another option would be using coilovers, so that you can adjust the corner weights by adjusting the static ride height.
BTW, the torque tube idea is way older than the 928 Porsche (sweet car though). The Model T-Ford used one.
I'd rather go with aluminum heads, a fiberglass hood, and other front end lightening components to reach the 50/50 weight split. Another option would be using coilovers, so that you can adjust the corner weights by adjusting the static ride height.
BTW, the torque tube idea is way older than the 928 Porsche (sweet car though). The Model T-Ford used one.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Europe
Car: 98 T/A
Engine: ls1
Money - heh...
Is it even possible to get a 50/50 weight distribution in a fbody leaving a drivetrain as it is?
Or if not how close to acomplishing this goal can you get?
Is it even possible to get a 50/50 weight distribution in a fbody leaving a drivetrain as it is?
Or if not how close to acomplishing this goal can you get?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
I don't know if you could ever get a true 50/50 but you can get pretty close. The weight distrabution isn't that bad in our cars. The motor sits pretty far back and the tranny is almost at the center of the car. The weight of the rear end helps balance everything out. It would be neat to see how close guys are with aluminum heads, radiator and various other weight reductions.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
Dec 2, 2016 06:33 PM






