Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

2.73 to a 3.73

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2008 | 10:47 PM
  #1  
Jeff234's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Car: Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 2.73's
2.73 to a 3.73

hey everyone i have an 88 iroc 305 auto with 2.73's, and i want to put 3.73's in the rear and i was wondering how much torque and hp i would gain and how much it would cost to buy and get installed. thanks!
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 01:18 AM
  #2  
sailtexas186548's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

you wont gain any tq or hp, it will just give you a better mechanical advantage because of the better gear ratio, so your car will accelerate faster, and thus feel faster/more powerful, but it will limit top speed, increase your cruising rpm, and lower your gas mileage. cost wise i have no idea
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 06:24 AM
  #3  
DJP87Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 15
From: Florida
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

If you have a extra $700/800 for parts & labor depending on your location. You been reading too much about gear changes and unless you don't need the money leave it alone.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #4  
joeblue83's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: Southern Wisconsin
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: Probuilt 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

If your looking for better acceleration and track use, for your 305 3.73 would be to steep for your combo, I would recommend using 3.42 gears. Better for economy and better acceleration than the stock 2.73
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #5  
krisb410's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 1
From: Naples, FL
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

I replaced my 2.73s with 3.42s. I love it except that I lost too much of the top end. I am putting 3.23s in tomorrow, hopefully that's be the happy medium.

I have a TBI/auto car, not sure how it'll be different than your car though.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:46 PM
  #6  
suh_wheat_86305's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: tucson
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23 gears
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

I have 2.77 now and can easily cruise at 40, even 50 in second, waiting to punch and flip to third (yes, i'm obnoxious). The fresh 305 seems to love the 2k to 3.8k rpm range, so I'm thinking the 3.73 might not be too much. Beside, a complete 10 bolt 3.42 is hard to find and I'm really sick of the sluggish 2.77. But, I definately hear what most are saying... the tpi setup really flattens out at 4k... but, dang it... seems like 3.73 would give the morning rush hour stop light rush that I crave... yes? f the gas & rubber!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #7  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

We went from a 3.08 open to a 3.73 posi rear in my wife's 90 RS autocross car. It was FUN, but it also made us learn to drive an autocross course again.

Very tail happy, but VERY worth it too! DO IT!

We swapped in a complete rear end, so no clue on costs.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:52 AM
  #8  
racing geek's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by Stephen
We went from a 3.08 open to a 3.73 posi rear in my wife's 90 RS autocross car. It was FUN, but it also made us learn to drive an autocross course again.

Very tail happy, but VERY worth it too! DO IT!

We swapped in a complete rear end, so no clue on costs.
This is exactly what I am afraid of. I found a drum brake 10 bolt 3.73 posi rear for 200 obo in my area (this would replace my 10 bolt drum brake 2.73 limited slip). I would love the 3.73 gears but I am wondering if it is too much for autocross. I already have a very sensitive gas pedal and I'm assuming this will make it even worse. It's between either 3.42 or 3.73 gears for me.

Mike

Edit: Could a smaller rear sway bar be used to prevent the rear of the car from breaking loose as often?</div>

Last edited by racing geek; Jul 25, 2008 at 01:24 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:58 AM
  #9  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

You'll just need to relearn that you have better acceleration, and on autocross, the extra torque/leverage is great to have, on the short runs from cone to cone.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #10  
RED_DRAGON_85's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

well a smaller rear bar would introduce more static understeer into the suspension, but even so, it would probably be a lot to handle.
if it were me, id go UP on the front bar, go UP in rear tire size and use stickies for track days ONLY.

then look into good shocks and you should be set.
a good set of shocks makes the world of difference.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #11  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Actually..Bigger rear bars are not always better.

Biggest stock is 24mm, front 36mm

Best choice would be 36mm front/19mm21mm22mm rear, dependnig on the driver & the tires ability to stick.

Allowing a SLIGHTLY more rear body roll, helpsgthe downward pressure to plant the tires harder.

I wanna trade my 24mm rear for a 19mm/21mm rear bar.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:48 PM
  #12  
gcgarner's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Morganton, NC
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

10 bolt 3.73 posi rear for 200 obo in my area (this would replace my 10 bolt drum brake 2.73 limited slip)
For the LAST TIME people!!! Limited Slip and Posi are the SAME FRIGGIN' THING! Dang!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2008 | 02:40 AM
  #13  
slow89's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: Fort worth Tx
Car: 89 irocz
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 373
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

i have a stock 305 had 2.73's and in the 1/8th mile i ran a 10.6 put the 3.73's in and ran a 10.2 i was very happy with the change makes the car feel alot quicker
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #14  
racing geek's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 with Edelbrock ProFlow EFI
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.73 Eaton posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by Stephen
Actually..Bigger rear bars are not always better.

Biggest stock is 24mm, front 36mm

Best choice would be 36mm front/19mm21mm22mm rear, depending on the driver & the tires ability to stick.

Allowing a SLIGHTLY more rear body roll, helps get the downward pressure to plant the tires harder.

I wanna trade my 24mm rear for a 19mm/21mm rear bar.
I currently have the 36/23 bars. Driving my car around town and pushing it in some turns the car seems ok with the rear bar the way it is but I think when I really push the car during autocross, it will prove to be too much.

What I put in bold is what I was thinking about when I asked the question about a smaller rear sway bar.

Also, Stephen, there is a 19mm or 21mm bar in the junkyard down the road from me... should I look into it?

Originally Posted by RED_DRAGON_85
well a smaller rear bar would introduce more static understeer into the suspension, but even so, it would probably be a lot to handle.
if it were me, id go UP on the front bar, go UP in rear tire size and use stickies for track days ONLY.

then look into good shocks and you should be set.
a good set of shocks makes the world of difference.
The front bar is already as big as it will go. I would like to go up in tire size but I don't want to spend money on wider wheels and/or stickier tires. Plus, for the class I am in, I can't go less that 140 for tread ware and it has to be DOT approved.

I'm going to be installing Koni Yellows on all 4 corners and I have Spohn SFC waiting to be installed. On a side note... I bought some Corbeau Forza seats to hopefully hold me in better. My legs were getting really tired by the end of the day...

Mike
</div>
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #15  
GoodlookinRS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Waynesville ohio
Car: 1986 corvette Z51
Engine: L98
Transmission: doug nash 4+3 speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

I put in my 3:73 a week ago its a little much for my car but if you have plans for other mods like a new engine then it is a good mod.
kevin
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #16  
Jammin'Trey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 355
Likes: 1
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

ok timed my car today with factory 2.73s, 305 TBI 305. It was 8.8 with a little chirp in 1st and 2nd.

Will post up what my 3.73s show later.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 05:21 PM
  #17  
a mack6's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh & Allentown PA
Car: 1992 Z28 (Heritage Edition)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by Jammin'Trey
ok timed my car today with factory 2.73s, 305 TBI 305. It was 8.8 with a little chirp in 1st and 2nd.

Will post up what my 3.73s show later.
8.8 0-60?? If so, WOW! I knew 305TBI/Autos were dogs (i had one) but i would have guessed a slightly faster 0-60.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #18  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by racing geek
Also, Stephen, there is a 19mm or 21mm bar in the junkyard down the road from me... should I look into it?
Mike
</div>
Don't go outta your way. You can if you want, but I'm not sure I'd wanna know the shipping on an item that big.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:08 PM
  #19  
Zepher's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by krisb410
I replaced my 2.73s with 3.42s. I love it except that I lost too much of the top end. I am putting 3.23s in tomorrow, hopefully that's be the happy medium.

I have a TBI/auto car, not sure how it'll be different than your car though.
How much top end did you lose? 150mph to 140mph?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:11 PM
  #20  
krisb410's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 1
From: Naples, FL
Car: 91 RS Camaro, 75 L82 Corvette
Engine: LO3, 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4, TH400
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.23 posi/LS1 discs, stock
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Engine was screaming at 110, now it's more "normal" sounding
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #21  
Jammin'Trey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 355
Likes: 1
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by a mack6
8.8 0-60?? If so, WOW! I knew 305TBI/Autos were dogs (i had one) but i would have guessed a slightly faster 0-60.

Shut up... I'm working on it lol
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #22  
GoodlookinRS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Waynesville ohio
Car: 1986 corvette Z51
Engine: L98
Transmission: doug nash 4+3 speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Its ok mine went 7.2 secs lol thats so bad!
kevin
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 02:31 AM
  #23  
fiveoformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 1
From: Orygun
Car: 1988 Formula Firebird
Engine: 5.3 LM4
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 True-Trac
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

im considering the same swap... it should put you at like 3900 rpms when you finish the quarter mile in third... which is good because the power band runs out after 4k
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #24  
Jammin'Trey's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 355
Likes: 1
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Originally Posted by GoodlookinRS
Its ok mine went 7.2 secs lol thats so bad!
kevin

I wonder is this with your 3.73...?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 12:33 PM
  #25  
GoodlookinRS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Waynesville ohio
Car: 1986 corvette Z51
Engine: L98
Transmission: doug nash 4+3 speed
Axle/Gears: 3:42 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Ya why?
kevin
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 01:33 AM
  #26  
blp226's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

limited slip and posi are NOT exactly the same thing. It's like Chevy and Camaro. Limited slip is a type of posi. A true posi doesn't allow slip for corners and turning. Like a tractor or dragstrip only racer. I know its mincing words but still.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #27  
big gear head's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Posi and Positive Traction are trade names for the Eaton brand limited slip that was used in the Chevy 12 bolt and 8.2 10 bolt. The name Posi is a registered trade mark for Eaton. Limited slip and posi ARE the same thing. Auburn calls theirs a Sure Grip (Mopar), AMC called theirs Safety Trac, Spicer calls theirs Power Lock, Ford is a Traction Lock... All of these are limited slip, just different names. The Eaton Posi name is the one that caught on and most people use that name to describe all limited slip differentials. Posi IS limited slip.

A spool locks both axles together and does not allow any slip in corners. This is what is used for drag racing.

Last edited by big gear head; Dec 15, 2008 at 05:44 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 06:26 AM
  #28  
kcb37's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Re: runescape gold

Planning on putting 3.73's in my car too.
It won't be for a few more months, but.
Going along with our cars being slow, don't know what my 0 to 60 is off the top of my head.
But ya do feel kinda stupid when Jr Dragsters are going faster then you.
Just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 10:16 AM
  #29  
gcgarner's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Morganton, NC
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

Posi and Positive Traction are trade names for the Eaton brand limited slip that was used in the Chevy 12 bolt and 8.2 10 bolt. The name Posi is a registered trade mark for Eaton. Limited slip and posi ARE the same thing. Auburn calls theirs a Sure Grip (Mopar), AMC called theirs Safety Trac, Spicer calls theirs Power Lock, Ford is a Traction Lock... All of these are limited slip, just different names. The Eaton Posi name is the one that caught on and most people use that name to describe all limited slip differentials. Posi IS limited slip.

A spool locks both axles together and does not allow any slip in corners. This is what is used for drag racing.
Thank you, thank you, thank you big gear head!!! If I hear another person misuse "posi" again ... I've said this before ... I think I will scream! I've said this same thing over and over, and for some reason, people still think "posi" is the correct term for a limited-slip differential. Now blp226 is saying there is a difference between a "true posi" and lsd. They do make locking rear ends, but if I'm not mistaken, those are not referred to as "posi".
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #30  
ownor's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 2
From: Austria
Car: 84 TA / 89 Formula
Engine: LS1 / L03
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 / 3.27
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

full ack @gcgarner and big gear head. posi and lsd are the same effin thing ^^
i will put in 3.42 and posi into my formula's rear end this winter, i feel 3.73 would be too much with the 700r4. i might end up doing a t56 swap later down the road, so maybe i'll upgrade gears again at this point
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #31  
gcgarner's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Morganton, NC
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

ownor, you will NOT be disappointed in the 3.42's. That's what I did with mine, and I'm pretty sure I would have been a little let down with 3.73's behind my TPI and 700r4. The 3.42 is plenty low enough for the around-town/highway driving that I do.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2008 | 12:34 PM
  #32  
ownor's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 2
From: Austria
Car: 84 TA / 89 Formula
Engine: LS1 / L03
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 / 3.27
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

yeah, as you can see i have a stock 3.73 rearend in my 84 HO, that thing really hauls a$$, but then again it has a T5 and its powerband is way up higher in rpms than on any other engine used in the 3gen. for the formula, i will do a lt1 cam swap, exhaust and intake, and i feel 3.42 will be a really good choice for that with the 700r4. i dont drive on the highway a lot, but i guess milage would suffer quite a bit if i would be going 80mph (limit in austria) or even faster like most do. thanks for the input
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #33  
kcb37's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

ownor,
posi and ls are not the same thing, (did you notice how I could say that without swearing).
What they are trying to say is posi is like drywall for example. Everyone calls it drywall, that's not true though, it's a brand name, when it is actually sheet rock.
So now posi and ls are not the same.
Posi refers to one makers brand, while ls refers to all of them.
Just most people don't realize this until someone tells them, or they are to hardheaded to let anyone tell them they could be wrong.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #34  
Stephen's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

But most of us don't CARE enough about limited slip vs posi.

SAME thing, different name, that's all. And 4 letters is easier to type than 12.....
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #35  
ownor's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 952
Likes: 2
From: Austria
Car: 84 TA / 89 Formula
Engine: LS1 / L03
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 / 3.27
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

@kcb, the point is they can't be compared really. it's like comparing cars and camaros. of course, every camaro is a car. every posi is also a limited slip. but not every ls (car) is a posi (camaro) see? or, in computing terms, it's like comparing a base class to an instanced object. anyway.. let's forget about this. it's like arguing about fruits (ls) and apples (posi) being the same damn thing anyway, talking about our cars, they are the same thing.

Last edited by ownor; Dec 19, 2008 at 05:04 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #36  
gcgarner's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 4
From: Morganton, NC
Car: '92 T/A WS6 Vert/1956 Chevy Nomad
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4 w/ Transgo Kit
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

I agree that this needs to be dropped ... esp. since it has nothing to do with the original question. My problem is, to reference your "apples vs. fruit" analogy, some people are saying that all fruit is an apple. Posi is the trade name of a product used by a specific brand of lsd's. End of discussion.

Alright, let's move on.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 09:08 AM
  #37  
big gear head's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Re: 2.73 to a 3.73

The original question is 5 months old. Why was this brought back to start with?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JSDaddy189
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
4
Sep 26, 2015 03:50 PM
64Chief
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 12, 2015 08:05 AM
whyt86roc
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 10, 2015 10:03 PM
john204481
Engine Swap
0
Sep 7, 2015 03:22 PM
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Sep 2, 2015 08:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 PM.