Just wondered how it was and if its the console one like the megashifter? thanks for any info.

 

Buddy has one. Got it because he didn't realize the MegaShifter was available in a console style. If you ask him now, though, he'll tell you it's because the Hammer is a better shifter...

Fiddled quite awhile with the Radio Shack switches you have to get, but seems to be working fine for him.

------------------
82 Berlinetta, orig V-6 car, now w/86 LG4/TH700R4. 2.93 limited slip. 2-1/2" cat-back, ZZ3 intake, Accel HEI SuperCoil. AMSOIL syn lubes bumper-to-bumper. Daily driver, work-in-progress (LG4 CC system w/'87 LB9 block, ZZ3 cam, ported World 305 heads, Hooker 2055 headers, 3" Catco cat & 3" catback, restalled TC, Spohn SFCs).
57 Bel Air, my 1st car. '66 396, 9.7 CR forged TRWs, Weiand Action+, Holley 750VS w/4150 conversion, GK 270 cam, Magnum rockers, Jacobs Omnipack, 1-3/4" Hedders & 3" Warlocks, TH400 w/TCI Sat Night Special conv & Trans-Scat shift kit, MegaShifter, 3.08 8.2" 10-bolt w/Powertrax, AMSOIL syn lubes bumper-to-bumper. Idles smooth @ 600 RPM in D. Best 15.02/95.06 @ 5800' Bandimere (corrected 13.93/102.4 @ sea level).

 

Somebody else must have one it looks nicer than the megashifter, but cost more.

 

Ive been looking into the megashifter and the hammer shifter...the thing I like about the hammer shifter is that nice leather boot...i HATE the crappy plastic/rubber boot the megashifter has....makes it look like a toy or something. However I like the mega shifter because its a console model...the hammer isnt. Someone said that it may be possible to use the hammer leather boot....or any boot from a manual car, on the megashifter...but he wasnt completely sure about it. Once I start working on the interior of my car...I will probably just go ahead and buy a megashifter (unless I decide to go with a 6 speed)...then look at it and see if I can put a leather boot on it.