M22 Tranny
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Car: 1991 Firebird Base
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic
M22 Tranny
Being young, I look to more experienced people for advice on how I should build my car. I told my dad's best friend that I wanted to convert to a manual transmission and he suggested getting an old "rock crusher" 4 speed. Any thoughts?
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 858
Likes: 6
From: Elkton MD, USA
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28, VIN F
Engine: 427 sbc, HSR
Transmission: T-56, self rebuilt 700+ hp
Axle/Gears: Moser 12bolt, 3.42 trutrac
Re: M22 Tranny
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: santa barbara,ca
Car: 1990 iroc z
Engine: LSX 376 F1A
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt 3.42
Re: M22 Tranny
i would say go for it, but they are not cheap. i believe from what i remember they cost over a $1000 to rebuild a 4 speed but that's just the parts not the labor.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,804
Likes: 103
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: M22 Tranny
4 speeds dont have overdrive either. stick with a 5 speed with OD.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: M22 Tranny
Muncies aren't great transmissions. They were just better than other offerings at the time. Their main problem was the cases were weak (T5s suffer a similar problem) so the lesser angle on the gear teeth is a band-aid. A Super T-10 (which came in some 82 F-bodies) is a lot better trans if you want a 4 speed.
I don't suggest doing anything that hurts the function of the car (like losing OD.) A T5 would be a fine choice to run w/ your 305 for a while and you can plan a bigger, stronger engine and a T56 or other manual trans. in the future.
I don't suggest doing anything that hurts the function of the car (like losing OD.) A T5 would be a fine choice to run w/ your 305 for a while and you can plan a bigger, stronger engine and a T56 or other manual trans. in the future.
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Car: 1991 Firebird Base
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic
Re: M22 Tranny
I bought a 91 S10 2.8L TBI 5 speed (T5) for my daily driver (gets me 26.45 mpg to work). The Trans Am is my project. I plan on putting at least 400hp in the engine. Roll cage and body stabilizers to prevent the chassis from twisting. OD is not needed. This is going to be my weekend street beast.
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Car: 1991 Firebird Base
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic
Re: M22 Tranny
I was thinking of making an improved version of what these guys did. They calculated all overall price and got 447hp for $3500.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...ock/index.html
I have a bare block 350 sitting in my birds front seat waiting to be built, has no cracks, no rust, and it doesn't have any signs of having a ridge. It's an 010 block from a 78 Camaro. It came stock with 180hp, so my guess is that the owner pulled the engine and threw something beefier in. It's only a 2-bolt so I'd have to get it splayed, but I only bought the bare block for $25.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...ock/index.html
I have a bare block 350 sitting in my birds front seat waiting to be built, has no cracks, no rust, and it doesn't have any signs of having a ridge. It's an 010 block from a 78 Camaro. It came stock with 180hp, so my guess is that the owner pulled the engine and threw something beefier in. It's only a 2-bolt so I'd have to get it splayed, but I only bought the bare block for $25.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Car: 1991 Firebird Base
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic
Re: M22 Tranny
Anyone have any opinion on the brands and parts used in that build?
Last edited by Joiner; Jan 6, 2011 at 04:07 AM.
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Car: 1991 Firebird Base
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic
Re: M22 Tranny
Decided to not use their build. I would like to make my own, and upon further studying, their block is a gen II and mine is a gen I, the parts don't work right.
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 858
Likes: 6
From: Elkton MD, USA
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28, VIN F
Engine: 427 sbc, HSR
Transmission: T-56, self rebuilt 700+ hp
Axle/Gears: Moser 12bolt, 3.42 trutrac
Re: M22 Tranny
Sounds like you're replying back to your own posts about a motor? You might want to try opening up a thread in a motor/engine forum, you won't get much feedback about it here on the transmission forum...
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
Car: 1991 Firebird Base
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: 700R4 Automatic
Re: M22 Tranny
I have a motor build thread posted and they were assuming I was going to stay automatic. So I posted a link to my own thread in my engine build, thinking they would check it out. I read on the thread and realized that when I made it, I didn't know as much about what I wanted. Thank you for input.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TinnMann2
Canadian Region
16
Jun 18, 2017 05:10 PM









