M39 vs MK6
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: Newtown, CT
Car: 1987 IROC Original Owner
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M39 MM5
Axle/Gears: G80 G92 J65
M39 vs MK6
Other than the 5th gear ratio being different, what are the differences between these two transmissions? Stiffer case, different input/output shafts, beefier internals, gear angles?
Is this similar to the M21 vs M22 comparison or is there more to it?
Anyone out there with intimate knowledge I would appreciate your input here.
Thanks
Is this similar to the M21 vs M22 comparison or is there more to it?
Anyone out there with intimate knowledge I would appreciate your input here.
Thanks
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: M39 vs MK6
The TBI and LG4 (grocery cart) cars got a .63:1 5th.
The L69 & LB9 (performance) cars got a .73:1 5th.
There is no other difference whatsoever between them. Same intermediate gear ratios, same weeeeek case, same tiny gears, same same same.
As far as the various 6-cyls, I haven't the vaguest clue what they got.
The L69 & LB9 (performance) cars got a .73:1 5th.
There is no other difference whatsoever between them. Same intermediate gear ratios, same weeeeek case, same tiny gears, same same same.
As far as the various 6-cyls, I haven't the vaguest clue what they got.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: Newtown, CT
Car: 1987 IROC Original Owner
Engine: LB9
Transmission: M39 MM5
Axle/Gears: G80 G92 J65
Re: M39 vs MK6
Did one have electronics for the speedometer or speed sensor and the other not?
Thanks
Thanks
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: M39 vs MK6
No.
The setups for a cable speedo and for a VSS are COMPLETELY interchangeable. The transmission is the same. In fact in some years Camaro still used a cable with the VSS in the instrument cluster but the Birds used a trans-mounted VSS, in otherwise identical transmissions differentiated by application as described above.
Can't comment on 6-cyls. Those transmissions don't fit anything I would ever have and I would never use one for anything so I couldn't care less.
The setups for a cable speedo and for a VSS are COMPLETELY interchangeable. The transmission is the same. In fact in some years Camaro still used a cable with the VSS in the instrument cluster but the Birds used a trans-mounted VSS, in otherwise identical transmissions differentiated by application as described above.
Can't comment on 6-cyls. Those transmissions don't fit anything I would ever have and I would never use one for anything so I couldn't care less.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: M39 vs MK6
The TBI and LG4 (grocery cart) cars got a .63:1 5th.
The L69 & LB9 (performance) cars got a .73:1 5th.
There is no other difference whatsoever between them. Same intermediate gear ratios, same weeeeek case, same tiny gears, same same same.
As far as the various 6-cyls, I haven't the vaguest clue what they got.
The L69 & LB9 (performance) cars got a .73:1 5th.
There is no other difference whatsoever between them. Same intermediate gear ratios, same weeeeek case, same tiny gears, same same same.
As far as the various 6-cyls, I haven't the vaguest clue what they got.
The 0.63 was not limited to LB9 / LG4; my first NWC T5 was 0.63 and from an '84 L69 Trans Am. The 0.63 makes perfect sense with 3.73 rear gears, which were offered with the L69 and LG4, but never the LB9, nor TBI.
And yes, 5th is the only difference between the two.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: M39 vs MK6
Every L69 one I ever got, had a .73:1 in it. (my original and 2 others)
The only one I ever got that I knew for sure came from LB9 (actually came out of a 91 1LE car) had .73:1.
Every other one I ever got (quite a few, therefore likely to be from the more common cars) had .63:1.
I screwed up and put a .63 in my car once. (just the stock gears, 3.73) It SUCKED. It made the car feel like it needed another gear in between 4th and 5th; kinda like the 700-R4 feels almost like it needs a 1½th gear.
I threw a handful of .63 gears away once. Got tired of em sitting around. I think I've pared my T-5 junk down to the point that I don't have any more of em.
AFAIK all the V8 T-5s in these cars came with about a 2.95:1 1st gear.
The only one I ever got that I knew for sure came from LB9 (actually came out of a 91 1LE car) had .73:1.
Every other one I ever got (quite a few, therefore likely to be from the more common cars) had .63:1.
I screwed up and put a .63 in my car once. (just the stock gears, 3.73) It SUCKED. It made the car feel like it needed another gear in between 4th and 5th; kinda like the 700-R4 feels almost like it needs a 1½th gear.
I threw a handful of .63 gears away once. Got tired of em sitting around. I think I've pared my T-5 junk down to the point that I don't have any more of em.
AFAIK all the V8 T-5s in these cars came with about a 2.95:1 1st gear.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 2
From: North Salt Lake
Car: '86 Camaro, '94 Camaro, 3 others
Engine: LG4 ->L29, L32->LR4, L36, LG4, L31
Transmission: 700R-4, T5WC, 4L80E, SM465, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, 3.23, WTB/WTT 2.93
Re: M39 vs MK6
According to the GM heritage center, there were L69 / 0.63 combos, but in '85, not '84.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zman1969
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Nov 8, 2015 01:27 PM











