vibration from tourque arm
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Cottage Grove Oregon
Car: 84 s/e, 94 must conv, 66 must
Engine: 2.8 v6
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi just chngd from 3.73
vibration from tourque arm
so how important is the cold rolled steel bar that goes from the rear end housing to the bracket on the transmission? Just changed out the clutch and looking at the system I could not see a reason for it... so I did not put it back.... but when I took it for a test drive it has a bit of a vibration that gets a bit bad..... I did check the u's and they're oK thoughts.... thanks Dioug
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,752
Likes: 996
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: vibration from tourque arm
so how important is the cold rolled steel bar that goes from the rear end housing to the bracket on the transmission? Just changed out the clutch and looking at the system I could not see a reason for it... so I did not put it back.... but when I took it for a test drive it has a bit of a vibration that gets a bit bad..... I did check the u's and they're oK thoughts.... thanks Dioug
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: vibration from tourque arm
Can't drive the car without it. (not for very long anyway)
It keeps the rear axle assy from rotating. Absolutely critical.
If it's not there, the rear axle can rotate to anywhere it wants, until it breaks something and rotates some more. Probably the shocks would wipe out first. The rear U-joints might not make it all the way around the block. Lord only knows what might happen to the rear brake line.
Park the car and put it back.
It keeps the rear axle assy from rotating. Absolutely critical.
If it's not there, the rear axle can rotate to anywhere it wants, until it breaks something and rotates some more. Probably the shocks would wipe out first. The rear U-joints might not make it all the way around the block. Lord only knows what might happen to the rear brake line.

Park the car and put it back.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Cottage Grove Oregon
Car: 84 s/e, 94 must conv, 66 must
Engine: 2.8 v6
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi just chngd from 3.73
Re: vibration from tourque arm
that's what I thought... but don'[t the arms below the rear end tubes act that way? I will put it back though.. lol,,, and thanks they are such a b to get in there. mcbitchman comes from mcdonalds... long story..
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Cottage Grove Oregon
Car: 84 s/e, 94 must conv, 66 must
Engine: 2.8 v6
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi just chngd from 3.73
Re: vibration from tourque arm
thank you.... I will ,, don't the lower arms act in that way? any thoughts on putting the arm back in.. tough one for sure. dj
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16,752
Likes: 996
From: Mile High Country !!!
Car: 1967 Camaro, 91 z28
Engine: Lb9
Transmission: M20
Axle/Gears: J65 pbr on stock posi 10bolt
Re: vibration from tourque arm
I’m sure a gm engineer came up with a way to waste money instead of keepin the axle from wrapping.
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: vibration from tourque arm
don't the lower arms act in that way?
You have created the same problem that you would get if you took the LCAs off and left the torque arm on, except worse.
Supreme Member




Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,527
Likes: 240
From: Henrietta NY
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: vibration from tourque arm
This is just an epic quote. Put it back now and don't drive the car any more before you break something and get hurt. 
Yes we think you should put it back in. I always start with the rear end side first then pull it down into the mount on the trans side

Yes we think you should put it back in. I always start with the rear end side first then pull it down into the mount on the trans side
Last edited by midias; Oct 24, 2017 at 09:30 AM.
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,216
Likes: 1,141
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: vibration from tourque arm
Yikes
Senior Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 698
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
Re: vibration from tourque arm
I'm blown away that the car even moved....the lower control arms (inside of each rear wheel) are what the rear end pushes against to move the car forward, the panhandle bar and brace hold the rear in place left and right, and the torque arm (which you removed ) keeps the rear end from rotating opposite of the wheels....it rotates up when you give it gas and rotates down when you break....that's why on high horsepower F-bodies the trans mounts always go bad, the rear is always trying to lift up on the trans tailhousing when you give it gas...more power=more lift....that's why we replace it with poly or get an aftermarket one that's part of the cross member (like me)
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Cottage Grove Oregon
Car: 84 s/e, 94 must conv, 66 must
Engine: 2.8 v6
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi just chngd from 3.73
Re: vibration from tourque arm
OK OK.... It's back in.... I did find an easier way. On the drivers side of the rear housing is a bracket for the sway bar , by putting a bottle jack under the bracket it lifts the rear of the rear end twisting it up in the back and bringing the torques bar down in front making it much easier to install the unit..... thanks for the help guys.... Doug





