V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

3.5 60* v6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 11:19 PM
  #1  
funstick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
From: great lakes
3.5 60* v6

if you though the 60* v6 was dead you were dead wrong.it turns out GM is still making these bastards in the 3.5 version now. my bet would be to buy a 3.5 short block and slap a set of 2.8 3.1 iron head on it. im not sure how they maganed a 3.5 but they did. i was at the detriot internaitional car show and there it was in all its glory.

that funky 2.8 head bolt pattern that funky 60v6 pattern the distributor hole for the oil pump drive it still all there and reasd to be taken over.

so when hunting for a 3.4 remeber you could have a 3.5

ahhhh

PS author highly suggest try to cross ref a few p#'s to ensure a succesful swap.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #2  
WaynesRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,398
Likes: 1
From: Baton Rouge ,Louisiana ,USA
I didnt think the 3.5 was a V6 , I thought it was a "Inline 5 cyl " Not tryng to start a pissing match or flame war . Just curious , and wondering if anyone else heard this ?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 07:46 AM
  #3  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Any chance it's just a bored out 3.4?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 08:11 AM
  #4  
NHRATA01's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally posted by WaynesRS
I didnt think the 3.5 was a V6 , I thought it was a "Inline 5 cyl " Not tryng to start a pissing match or flame war . Just curious , and wondering if anyone else heard this ?
Nah I've heard the same thing. There bumping the 3.4 up to 3.5 and it will have 200hp. Man, GM should really let these engines just die off.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 10:45 AM
  #5  
funstick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,787
Likes: 0
From: great lakes
good news is its a cam in block pushrod v6. to me it looks like one could really just swap the heads from a3.1 or a 2.8 along with the intake and the motor mount boss's can be bolted to there 4 flat recess's. go take a peak these are in junkyards now.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #6  
1991tealRSt-topGuy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 2
Car: 1991 Corvette Coupe
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4/4L60 same trans different name
only downside is that they probably only make a FWD version, thus the starter is going to be on the wrong side and your gonna need some funky custom motor mounts
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2003 | 08:43 PM
  #7  
CaliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Engine: LH0 3.1L
Dead?? GM still uses the 3100 and 3400 in plenty of cars.

As far as this 3.5, the only one I'm aware of in production today is the Olds 3.5L.

The 2004 Malibu is scheduled to get a 3.5L V6. Also, GM will be making inline engines based on the 4.2L I6. One will be a 3.5L I5 and another will be a 2.8L I4 all with the same exact bore and stroke.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
topteam54
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
Oct 6, 2015 12:21 AM
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
0
Sep 8, 2015 12:06 PM
Steven 86IROC-Z
Car Audio
16
Sep 7, 2015 08:05 AM
Atropos
Exhaust
4
Sep 28, 2001 02:35 AM
SCRA rules!
Tech / General Engine
2
Apr 2, 2001 01:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:36 PM.