I just have to find out....
I just have to find out....
if this thread will get locked. It is a technical thread, but it seems the mods in this forum are on high alert?
Heres the tech part:
What is better? Stock manifolds or headers? How much power increase can one expect from installing headers on a V6? Will the ECM richen the mixture to compensate?
Heres the rest:
Anyone that wants headers email me and I'll give you the answers
Heres the tech part:
What is better? Stock manifolds or headers? How much power increase can one expect from installing headers on a V6? Will the ECM richen the mixture to compensate?
Heres the rest:
Anyone that wants headers email me and I'll give you the answers
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Well if it increases flow, wouldn't the injectors have to work harder, possibly spray more to accomidate, which that would make the ecm change it, to a point. Basically, the limits of the ecm.
Originally posted by Dale
Well if it increases flow, wouldn't the injectors have to work harder, possibly spray more to accomidate, which that would make the ecm change it, to a point. Basically, the limits of the ecm.
Well if it increases flow, wouldn't the injectors have to work harder, possibly spray more to accomidate, which that would make the ecm change it, to a point. Basically, the limits of the ecm.
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by NHRATA01
Yeah, but the ecm never gets the mixture right. Headers make an LS1 run rich, as I and many others can attest to. I'd assume with the less complex ecms of an older car, that it would be even more likely. Althought sometimes the older, more simple ecms respond better to certain mods than the new OBDII versions. So, I dunno, but I'd suspect headers would throw off the ecm, so plan on getting some sort of tuning device, wether it be a fuel pressure regulator, or a MAF tuner, or something along those lines.
Yeah, but the ecm never gets the mixture right. Headers make an LS1 run rich, as I and many others can attest to. I'd assume with the less complex ecms of an older car, that it would be even more likely. Althought sometimes the older, more simple ecms respond better to certain mods than the new OBDII versions. So, I dunno, but I'd suspect headers would throw off the ecm, so plan on getting some sort of tuning device, wether it be a fuel pressure regulator, or a MAF tuner, or something along those lines.
Originally posted by AGood2.8
Any headers application I have ever witnessed always makes a motor run leaner. I think you have things backwards.
Any headers application I have ever witnessed always makes a motor run leaner. I think you have things backwards.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Plus depending on your climate and the distance from the oxy sensor to the engine, you might need a 3-wire heated oxy sensor. Headers don't hold their heat too well compared to thick cast-iron, and if the oxy sensor is too far from the primaries, it might not heat up enough to work properly. Oxy sensors don't work until they warm up; when they're cold, they send a single non-changing value to the ECM. As soon as they warm up, they send a fluctuating voltage back, and the ECM says "Hey, the oxy sensor's ready!" and starts using it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
The hardest part is wiring a switch into the system. The Heated oxy sensor's got three wires; one is the signal wire for the computer, the other two are for the heating element. Both are usually colored black. Hook one black wire (doesn't matter which) to ground, hook another one through a heavy duty switch to the battery's positive terminal- and don't forget to turn the switch off!!
Better idea for a switch- a relay. Let the relay contacts handle the "switch" end. Control the relay's magnet (magnet on = pulls relay contacts together = closes relay switch) by wiring one end into ground, the other end thru a fuse into a circuit that comes on when the car is turned on. (Ex, the accessory fuse.) This is the absolute best way to wire it up, for at least two reasons.
First is that the relay handles the current of the heating element. Second is that the relay uses a thin, low-amperage, fused wire into the passenger compartment. These two reasons concern -safety- , keeps your car from catching on fire!
Better idea for a switch- a relay. Let the relay contacts handle the "switch" end. Control the relay's magnet (magnet on = pulls relay contacts together = closes relay switch) by wiring one end into ground, the other end thru a fuse into a circuit that comes on when the car is turned on. (Ex, the accessory fuse.) This is the absolute best way to wire it up, for at least two reasons.
First is that the relay handles the current of the heating element. Second is that the relay uses a thin, low-amperage, fused wire into the passenger compartment. These two reasons concern -safety- , keeps your car from catching on fire!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikkoV
TPI
2
Sep 9, 2015 04:25 PM
Street Lethal
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
0
Sep 7, 2015 01:09 PM




