rocker arms
rocker arms
im thinking about gettin these *jegs part # 249-1413-12* is there anything in the same price range that will produce more power? also if anyone has installed them can you tell me the process you went through? this would be my first time installing them, but i feel confident in doing it if given proper directions. thanks!
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
This is one of the hardest motors to set the rockers if its a MPFI and it has milage on it. Why? because the lifters will be worn (springs can be alot more collapsed that fresh new lifters) and when you try to set them with the motor off, its hard to get a "feel" on them when they are old. It is best to run the motor while setting them so you can here them "click" then just tighten them down one by one until each individual clicking rocker goes away- usually about 1/2 to 3/4 extra turn after the click noise disappears.
The clencher with this motor is the tight 60* design crammed up under the MPFI. "Rocker adjustment oil retainer clips" will not fit on the motor running and you'll have an oily mess dripping right on your exhaust manifold. So Its best to set them with the motor off- but only if your motor isn't old and worn.
I used the kit # CCA-RP1413-12 aprox $150 @ Summit. It included new hardened pushrods matched to the rockers. The new pushrods very close enough to the stock length rods but where stronger.
The clencher with this motor is the tight 60* design crammed up under the MPFI. "Rocker adjustment oil retainer clips" will not fit on the motor running and you'll have an oily mess dripping right on your exhaust manifold. So Its best to set them with the motor off- but only if your motor isn't old and worn.
I used the kit # CCA-RP1413-12 aprox $150 @ Summit. It included new hardened pushrods matched to the rockers. The new pushrods very close enough to the stock length rods but where stronger.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Dubuque, IA
Car: 2006 'Nox 91 Camaro RS 91 1500 Silv
Engine: GM 3.8L, 305 SBC, 350 SBC
Transmission: Auto, auto, auto
Why would you need stronger pushrods unless you were goin to be running pretty high rpms a lot?
Tom: maybe you should consult a psychaitrist (spelling?), I don't know if its healthy to be posting at 4:50 in the morning
j/k
Tom: maybe you should consult a psychaitrist (spelling?), I don't know if its healthy to be posting at 4:50 in the morning
j/k Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Says on mine 11:50pm?
Don't go roller tipped. Either go stamped (Cheap) or Full Roller (Best)
Don't go roller tipped. Either go stamped (Cheap) or Full Roller (Best)
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Stronger pushrods have stronger tips- less wear under greater forces of ratio rockers- Granted they really are too nescesary with 1.52 rollers- but they still will last longer and keep closer tolerances over time. With high lift cams, dual spring pressures and mostly high ratio rockers- the forces start mutiplying fast.
Originally posted by TomP
The Haynes 82-92 Camaro (or Firebird) manual has the procedure.
The Haynes 82-92 Camaro (or Firebird) manual has the procedure.
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Slow2.8
read it bout 3 times, i don't understand if i would have to take off the intake manifold? can you reach all the bolts w/ out taking it off? also it's pretty brief on explaining how to put on the rocker arms.
read it bout 3 times, i don't understand if i would have to take off the intake manifold? can you reach all the bolts w/ out taking it off? also it's pretty brief on explaining how to put on the rocker arms.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Dubuque, IA
Car: 2006 'Nox 91 Camaro RS 91 1500 Silv
Engine: GM 3.8L, 305 SBC, 350 SBC
Transmission: Auto, auto, auto
its a whole lot easier with the intake manifold off though...you can see the lifters and what position they are in.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Mostly in water off So. Cal
Car: '87 Chev
Engine: 60*V6
Transmission: DY T700
Originally posted by Damien00677
its a whole lot easier with the intake manifold off though...you can see the lifters and what position they are in.
its a whole lot easier with the intake manifold off though...you can see the lifters and what position they are in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92rsvortec350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
19
Oct 9, 2015 09:39 AM




