Centerlink bad... alignment settings?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Centerlink bad... alignment settings?
Found out my centerlink is bad, when I went to get an alignment...
Anywho, I'm getting a new centerlink, both inner and outer tie rod ends, and ball joints. The idler arm is only a couple months old, and the pitman arm doesn't really wear, right?
Any suggestions on alignment specs? 245/50/16s on the front...
Anywho, I'm getting a new centerlink, both inner and outer tie rod ends, and ball joints. The idler arm is only a couple months old, and the pitman arm doesn't really wear, right?
Any suggestions on alignment specs? 245/50/16s on the front...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
pitman arms can wear out, but not usually. I belive the test is if you cain rock it up & down a certain amount of distance.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
85's right, I'm still on my +261,000 mile Pitman arm! It's not really a joint, it's more of a swivel. The idler arm attaches to the centerlink in the same manner (not a joint), BUT, it's the joint in the middle of the idler arm that wears out.
If you're on a budget, you usually don't have to replace the tie rod ends unless you bent one- they're "self-adjusting for wear", whatever the hell that means. At my last alignment check-up (when the guy rattled off everything that was bad), he didn't include the tie rod ends. He'd included everything else which I knew about, so I was a bit surprised the tie rod ends were still good. (See https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=153839 ) That's when I read in the GM book that the tie rods self-adjusted for wear.
But it's definately smarter to replace them while you're in there anyway. (Why pay for two alignments?)
If you're on a budget, you usually don't have to replace the tie rod ends unless you bent one- they're "self-adjusting for wear", whatever the hell that means. At my last alignment check-up (when the guy rattled off everything that was bad), he didn't include the tie rod ends. He'd included everything else which I knew about, so I was a bit surprised the tie rod ends were still good. (See https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=153839 ) That's when I read in the GM book that the tie rods self-adjusted for wear.
But it's definately smarter to replace them while you're in there anyway. (Why pay for two alignments?)
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 231
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
I hate to say this but the pitman arm is nothing more then a piece of metal with a hole at each end. Nothing to wear out. Parts house won't even have a number for it.
RBob.
RBob.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Shelby Twp., MI
Car: 84 Z28 / 91 Trans Am
Engine: LS1 / 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T56 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.09 / 2.73
set camber straight up at 0. caster the max it will allow depending on year either 4.5 or 5.5. toe depends on what you can take 0 is performane but can be vary darty otherwise use stock setting.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
383backinblack
Transmissions and Drivetrain
8
Aug 15, 2015 06:36 PM





