V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

4.0L inline six in an f-body ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #1  
Xophertony's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 2
From: Or-eh-gun
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
4.0L inline six in an f-body ???

i noticed somthing whilen the boneyard about three months ago and was just reminded of it. some older jeep charokee's had a 2.8L V6 in them, i am told it the same engine that was in the s-10 blzers, and our f-bodys. my charokee (88) has a 4.0L inline six. i wonder if it would be possible to swap the 4.0L into an f-body. i would never attempt this, just asking for theory purposes. and to see if anyone actually has.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #2  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
Anything will fit. Check out the caddy swap in the engine swap forum, dude cut away the firewall & some of the tranny tunnel to ofset teh weight. This could also be done for the cjep motor. Don't know how deep the motor is though, that might be the main problem.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #3  
85f-bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
Um, yeh, anything will fit, w/ enough time, money, blood, and guts. Don't know the benefit, eh, different that's enough. i'm planning the northstar swap right ow, but eh, it's gonna take a lil' work and a lot of time. I'd also think that it'd fit better into a camaro rather a bird, because of the firebirds sloping hood. Hmmm, yeh, maro swap possible, bird swap too, but expet more work, would be interest ing though.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 10:30 PM
  #4  
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Just a cool FYI.
Jeep also used small block 350 buick motors during the early '70s. I've been told they used buick 3.8 V6s at one time too.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 11:29 PM
  #5  
nadster's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Wa
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8 (the cruiser)
Transmission: 700R4 (TransGo Kit, VetteServo)
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Personally I'd swap in a 350 if you were going to all that trouble. Or bigger even AMC/Chrysler (last AMC designed engine as you know already), did a really good job on that block measuring out around 195 hp avg for the HO 4.0L versions. (I also own a cherokee along with my fbody). If you'd really want to do it, go for it, but personally I'd rather spend bux on a 350 that does 250hp+. In fact, I've seen a few 350's in Chevy mag completely built that do over 250+ hp and one that does 330 for under 2500bux. Also, who wants to spend all that time fabricating mounts for that inline-6. That and with how long that block is... geesh.

-Dan
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 12:27 AM
  #6  
trickedout02's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, South Carolina
Engine: 302 5.0
Inline six's were known for there torque instead of there hp... I was thinking of this while I was at work today, funny how you posted... Also the Supras are inline six's... I think it would be worth swaping, if you can find a turbo 350 tranny
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 04:48 AM
  #7  
camaro_junkie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I was also thinking of something along these lines the other day. But transmissions. The T5 is not exactly known for its robustness, and apparently the T56 is a little work. But the Jeep had the 2.8, and it must have had a decent transmission, so how well would that bolt up to a thirdgen?
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 08:18 AM
  #8  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Originally posted by camaro_junkie
I was also thinking of something along these lines the other day. But transmissions. The T5 is not exactly known for its robustness, and apparently the T56 is a little work. But the Jeep had the 2.8, and it must have had a decent transmission, so how well would that bolt up to a thirdgen?
That is not 100% if you search through the many T5 threads you will find just as many guys blowing them with a mild 305 as well as guy with built 350's that have never blown one.

Its a big debate but one guy proved that the T5 was not used with a 350 for only 1 reason. Emission on the down shift were to high. EPA wouldn't allow it.

But after reading and reading it seams as if you take care and change the ATF with every oil change, don't do anything stupid like 4000 RPM drops a regular T5 can take the power of a 350.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 08:23 AM
  #9  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
One of the better quotes from the thread

"The T-5 is fine unless you powershift and launch with slicks, OR unless you're a moron, in which case, you can pretty much break ANYTHING.
"

But any who, its a thread worth reading.


"Why no T-5 in with the 350?

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=205699 "
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
camaro_junkie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Okay, well then I stand corrected, but that still leaves one question unanswered.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 01:46 PM
  #11  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
2jz-gte + 6 spd from a Supra in a 'maro... :drool:
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 02:13 PM
  #12  
LT1guy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Anything can be swapped into anything, it just depends on how much work you're willing to do. Jeep 4.0s arent known for anything in particular, including reliability, so I really see no reason to go to all the trouble, even if you have a free 4.0 sitting there. There are lots of engines available that would be far better suited for an F-body. BTW a 500 Caddy swap doesn't require cutting the firewall...they'll fit nicely in an F-body, or nearly anything else, as long as you use an Eldorado oil pan.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PurelyPMD
Camaros for Sale
27
May 5, 2016 04:57 PM
Silver Spear
South East Region
18
Dec 4, 2015 09:59 PM
88SS6SPEED
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Nov 11, 2015 07:05 AM
Nervous2
Firebirds for Sale
2
Oct 8, 2015 10:53 PM
lanceflame44
Tech / General Engine
0
Sep 25, 2015 12:28 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 PM.