V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

To do or not to do, catalytic converter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 10:54 AM
  #1  
yellowmaro's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: FT. Wayne, IN
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: 2.8, headers, duals
Transmission: auto, 125 speedo, accel coil, k & n
Axle/Gears: 3.42
To do or not to do, catalytic converter

Hi Everyone. Long time reader, first time poster. I have a 1986 camaro. Did the 3.4 swap which went very well. I have rebuilt the front end, 115 speedo, new headliner and soon rear springs. My converter gives off the rotten egg smell and I believe it has a hole/crack in it.

Should I put a new converter on or a straight piece of pipe? Will a straight pipe cause the check engine light to stay on constantly and or set codes constantly?

I am positive from past experience that converter removal increases gas mileage. However, I have never removed a converter from a vehicle with an oxygen sensor.

Also, I have seen on ebay a $39.99 "universal" converter for camaros. Anyone ever try one of these?


Thanks
Rick
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #2  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
I have a high flow converter. I lost power down low. After 65, I saw MINIMAL GAINS.
I have raced others with no converter at all AND WHOOPED THEM.

In all honesty, I would do a stock replacement converter. They are anywhere from 30-50 at most parts stores. But yes the smell is the converter.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 12:26 PM
  #3  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
A universal convertor means that it won't bolt up. You'll either need to weld it in place, or find some kind of adapter kit. I believe that's what the local parts stores sell; a universal convertor and a $20 adapter kit.

We're all OBD I, so the car will never know if there's a cat on it or not. Our oxy sensor is before the cat. OBD II (4th gen f-bodies) has an oxy sensor after the cat, so they either need to keep the cat or get one of those "fake" oxy sensors.

Also, one thing to keep in mind- what years have your past experience been with? Early cats were pieces of crap; they choked the motor. Newer GM cats flow just as well as a high-flow cat- except a new GM cat is about $300. Aftermarket high-flow is about $100. Plus, most original 82-92 cats have had their pellet bed break up by now, causing a clog...
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #4  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Ditch the cat. Went from a 17.4 to a 17.07 with a little extra timing, and removing that cat, in combo with a good TomP Tune Up.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #5  
Kj Rockz's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
From: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Just do what I did, and get rid of it. It does not cause the check engine light to come on in my car.
Plus I think I have more power now. Actually it feels llike I have more power now, I mean I can just burn out now without power brakeing. So I guess i'm the lucky one.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 02:20 PM
  #6  
camaro350man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Belchertown MA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Lt
Transmission: 5 Spd
I have a question. I have a 88 firebird 2.8 wiht what i believe to be the stock cat. Should i replace it or no? My echuast smells rich and i know the car is running good. Could that be my cat? Also when you stand by the passenger door the exhuast sounds tinny and it is very loud by the cat. What you guys think?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 08:02 PM
  #7  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
if the cat is leaking, replace/remove. your choice.

TomP My experiance is comparing the car before and after. Down low I can no longer grab 3rd, before I could. Yeah it squats, but no chirpy like before. And yes same tires on rear before/after.

The car I was racing was a semi built 2.8 auto.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #8  
Maverick H1L's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
350man, I believe you need to know that the only way the cat affects the air/fuel mixture is that is gets super clogged when the engine runs rich, so it gets destroyed in a sense, and exhaust flow slows down. Look for leaking injectors, have the ECM tested, etc. And if the exhaust is louder by the cat, it probebly has a hole in it.

Got my new cat for $65 and change at my local AutoZone, and it is a "direct fit", meaning you remove the old one and put the new one in without welding or any problems unless someone modified the system previously (DPO did so.. going to get him one of these days ) or if the system is seriously rusty...
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 10:00 AM
  #9  
camaro350man's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Belchertown MA
Car: 1988 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.8 Lt
Transmission: 5 Spd
Thanks, ya that will be the next, i will take a look at the cat today and see if there is a hole it in or not, not sure to be honest with ya. Just sounds very tinny. So the rich smell is not the cat? Thanks again.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #10  
Maverick H1L's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
NO, its not the cat, but it may destroy the cat if left unchecked, not to mention that if you are forming carbon chunks in the exhaust stream, you can clog it and lose a lot of power...
Forgot also that you were going to be replacing your flange gaskets at the manifolds. Take care of those first before worrying about the cat.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 07:16 AM
  #11  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
The original designed cat convertors will do exactly as Maverick H1L says.
My "Original style" replacement cat did that on the Firebird I have. When the cat dropped to the cement floor, BIG small chunks dropped out. I laughed.
I replaced that Firebird cat wth the AC Delco Cat Convertor one I scored when I purchased the 3.4 now in the Blazer. The Blazer has a 50,000 used 3.4 in it. I scored the 50,000 mile "Y" pipe & CC with the engine purchase. These exhaust pieces look brand new!
BEST CC I've ever used, this AC Delco. And performance made a hugh jump forward! That includes 3.4 powered.
My Blazer may need one, after this 3.4 installation, too. I replaced that factory issued CC back in 1990/91 with a universal 2 1/2" that has lasted to present date and with over 100,000 miles on it, too. Will see IF that old universal CC passes the next smog test, too!
Try to score a very low milage CC from a 4th Gen F Series. "Almost" any engine size, but you'll find one, easy. IF ya hold the AC Delco CC up to sun you see right thru the "guts" to the sun. That's the sign of a very good CC Hi Flow feature. Try the same trick on a factory issued pancake flat CC from 1975 - late 1980's. You'll never see the sun!
My 1975 Vega, brand new, first year of US auto maker issued CC's. I NEVER SMELLED ANYTHING SO BAD AS THAT ROTTEN EGG SMELL, especially on a humid, no wind air flow, suck in traffic situation. And your windows are down due to no AC. Oh it is fowl smelling.

My 1995 used 50,000 mile 4th Gen V6 F Body CC I installed on the 1985 factory issued exhaust system?
Bolted exactly as if it was made for that spot, not a single "alteration. AND NO rotten egg smell.
Pace Setter Exhaust ALSO MAKES Cat Convertors.
Besides having made our V6 60* 3rd Gen F Body Street Legal Headers, too!
Contact fgerle@pacesetterexhaust.com for a part number and vendor for purchase.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 05:29 AM
  #12  
Tom91RS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Removed Cat

I removed the converter from my 91rs (305) which gives it a better sound with the flowmaster. Don't know if it raised the hp but it sure feels better. Anyway, I think the 02 sensor is bad due to really,really bad gas mileage. I think the cat and 02 sensor work together. When removing the cat does it mess up the 02 sensor or does it even work anymore. I hear with no cat there is a "fake" 02 sensor which plugs in the electrical and corrects the false reading which guzzels the gas.

Any one know about the fake replacement for the 02 sensor ?????
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 05:53 AM
  #13  
RedTtop5spd's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: 99 SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
The O2 sensor is before the cat and removing the cat does nothing to it.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 05:58 AM
  #14  
Tom91RS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 tbi
So should I still replace the 02 sensor ?????

If it's bad is it affecting the mileage
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 06:51 AM
  #15  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
At $30-ish, it's certainly a cheap enough experiment for a solution.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #16  
CaliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Engine: LH0 3.1L
Re: Removed Cat

Originally posted by Tom91RS
I removed the converter from my 91rs (305) which gives it a better sound with the flowmaster. Don't know if it raised the hp but it sure feels better. Anyway, I think the 02 sensor is bad due to really,really bad gas mileage. I think the cat and 02 sensor work together. When removing the cat does it mess up the 02 sensor or does it even work anymore. I hear with no cat there is a "fake" 02 sensor which plugs in the electrical and corrects the false reading which guzzels the gas.

Any one know about the fake replacement for the 02 sensor ?????

That only applies to OBDII cars ('96-present). Those cars have O2 sensors before the cat for fuel control and O2 sensors after the cat for catalyst montitoring. If one were to remove the cat, the rear O2 sensor would know and the SES light will come on. If you replace that rear O2 sensor with an "O2 Sim" it will simulate the readings needed to keep the SES light off.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:17 PM
  #17  
FirebirdNYC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: Ozone Park, NYC
Car: 1990 firebird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 700R4
you guys got any links of where i can get a high flow cat for my 3.1 i seem to only find ones for 5.0
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 10:59 PM
  #18  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
www.pacesetterexhaust.com
For a specific application number and more personal service of Pace Setter Exhaust products (including the street legal headers for our V6 rides and yoru desired Cat Convertor)
send a short email to
Mr. Fred Gerle
fgerle@pacesetterexhaust.com
He'll be happy to assist ya!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 07:33 AM
  #19  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: High plains of NM
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
If it's cloged up at all you will see big gains.
I would gut it or replace it with a pipe eather way I would lose it.
It won't set off the "light" neather one of my cars have one.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 08:56 PM
  #20  
Red1992V6Rs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Williamsport PA
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: Auto
How about emissions? Would a car without the converter post a problem passing? Esp. with the sensor they put in the tailpipe.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 11:43 PM
  #21  
85f-bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
i would think that a good portion of this would have to do w/ how stringent your emissions testing is. If it's really strict, then you might not pass, if it'sn ot so strict, than you might pass. Around here in missouri, they're thinking about restricting emissions testing to 96+ vehicles, and all they'll do is plug the obdII into them and make sure everythings working, if it is, then they pass, if it's not, then you don't. So essentially, if ur check engine light isn't on, then you're good to go, that'll really help a bunch of us folks w/ older cars.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 01:27 AM
  #22  
CaliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,562
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Engine: LH0 3.1L
Originally posted by Red1992V6Rs
How about emissions? Would a car without the converter post a problem passing? Esp. with the sensor they put in the tailpipe.
A car with no converter will fail any ASM test.
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2024 | 08:55 AM
  #23  
Laneco's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2024
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Re: To do or not to do, catalytic converter

Originally Posted by yellowmaro
Hi Everyone. Long time reader, first time poster. I have a 1986 camaro. Did the 3.4 swap which went very well. I have rebuilt the front end, 115 speedo, new headliner and soon rear springs. My converter gives off the rotten egg smell and I believe it has a hole/crack in it.

Should I put a new converter on or a straight piece of pipe? Will a straight pipe cause the check engine light to stay on constantly and or set codes constantly?

I am positive from past experience that converter removal increases gas mileage. However, I have never removed a converter from a vehicle with an oxygen sensor.

Also, I have seen on ebay a $39.99 "universal" converter for camaros. Anyone ever try one of these?


Thanks
Rick


My 92 Camaro V6 RS runs like **** after converter was taken off
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
loud91rs
Camaros Wanted
11
Mar 28, 2016 04:13 PM
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
4
Nov 26, 2015 11:04 PM
TMZIrocZ350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Oct 7, 2015 12:09 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
Oct 4, 2015 07:48 PM
tcarlos13
Interior Parts Wanted
0
Sep 28, 2015 06:31 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 AM.