V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2004, 06:00 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

I just caught wind of this. I hear its around $3500 which isn't bad if you consider what a used iron block turbo car or engine would cost. $5-7000 easy for used parts.

TA performance is cool like that. If there is a need, they will cast / make it.


http://www.taperformance.com/v6_block_flyer.htm
Old 06-03-2004, 12:07 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
1986CamaroSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Axle/Gears: 3.42


under 100lbs, **** you could put that in without a hoist, haha

and 6 bolt main.....
Old 06-03-2004, 12:13 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
a 4" bore and 3.625" stroke 6cyl is a 273 right?

a sub 200lb assembled 273 motor (+turbo) would be badass.
Old 06-03-2004, 01:12 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I did get wind of a few bad points. Watch out for used blocks.
I guess there is a couple floating around swap meets that were assembled wrong with bad machine work. sleeves stuck up past the deck n other crap.
Old 06-05-2004, 05:51 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

 
SOLID LIFTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HAUNTING THE CHAPEL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '87 Mustang LX
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Re: Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

Originally posted by Gumby
Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

I just caught wind of this. I hear its around $3500 which isn't bad if you consider what a used iron block turbo car or engine would cost. $5-7000 easy for used parts.

TA performance is cool like that. If there is a need, they will cast / make it.


http://www.taperformance.com/v6_block_flyer.htm
With the new V6 and 455 buick blocks coming out it would be nice if someone would design a 350 buick block with a bore near or at least in the range of 4.00". It could happen with all the talk about aluminum heads for the 350 sb.
Old 06-06-2004, 12:05 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
That one that PAE has built is looking so good. Some good porting and tuning they got that street pump gas 350 well over 500hp. 455 guys are starting to sweat.
Once the aluminum heads and new intake are cast its gonna get scary for anyone but a Buick 350 owner. And their passengers.

Though I still know there is similar potential in the 60* block. The 3.8 Buick is cool but the 60* has more of a chance to be a RPM monster. The 2.8 as it is revs pretty darn fast, by the number it can spin 14,000 if the parts were there. Think how cool that 1st gear of the T5 would be if you spun to just 10k. You would be killing & murdering people by time you hit 3rd.

Why them imports can move. they spin up right now. rpmsxgears=fun, just like a motorcycle. Fast reving and gears can be more fun than brute force. It makes wining even more sweet. Though brute force has it place too.

If there becomes a demand the parts will come but we gotta get some of these turbo projects eating up cars at the track.
Old 06-09-2004, 02:07 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
PETE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
You'll prolly see 1000hp outta the stock 109 block soon. Attention to detail, quality components and meticulous assembly is what's needed for those motors(which is why I don't rebuild buicks )

Boost is addicting!!!!!
Old 06-09-2004, 04:41 PM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
Cleaner13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

Originally posted by Gumby
Aluminnnum V6 turbo 3.8 blocks

I just caught wind of this. I hear its around $3500 which isn't bad if you consider what a used iron block turbo car or engine would cost. $5-7000 easy for used parts.

TA performance is cool like that. If there is a need, they will cast / make it.


http://www.taperformance.com/v6_block_flyer.htm
Ive heard this engine block can support 3000 HP
Old 06-09-2004, 08:35 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
It's a nice piece but it's taken them FOREVER to get them into circulation.

They're cool and all but I'll stick with the 109 block. No need for any more power than what it can handle
Old 06-10-2004, 05:15 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Quick question and please don't take it the wrong way. Im just curious as to why buick and others came out with a turbo charged v6 rather than beefing up a v8? Was it for gas milage purposes or what? Once again, im not flaming, just curious.
Old 06-10-2004, 05:25 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by pasky
Quick question and please don't take it the wrong way. Im just curious as to why buick and others came out with a turbo charged v6 rather than beefing up a v8? Was it for gas milage purposes or what? Once again, im not flaming, just curious.
Because it's a damn good setup. Also at that time Buick was making a lot of 3.8's. I'm not sure when the stopped making the 350's. I'm sure cost came into consideration too.
Old 06-10-2004, 05:26 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
Cleaner13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by pasky
Quick question and please don't take it the wrong way. Im just curious as to why buick and others came out with a turbo charged v6 rather than beefing up a v8? Was it for gas milage purposes or what? Once again, im not flaming, just curious.
honestly man I dont know

if I were to take a guess these would be my suggestions


1. Not enough room in the engine bay

2. Engine would be guaranteed to have beat out the Vette (which is a no no by GM), instead of suprising everyone with just the V-6

3. maybe the idea of the other V-8 they had was such a let down that they wanted to try it on a different engine?

those are my only guesses and I had another buy forgot but will post if I remember
Old 06-10-2004, 06:07 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
"2. Engine would be guaranteed to have beat out the Vette (which is a no no by GM), instead of suprising everyone with just the V-6 "

that is it. The Firebird was suppose to be the major competitor for the vette but GM did not and doesn't like anything competing with the vette.

Its a shame but we have missed out on allot of cool car to save face for the poor vette.
Old 06-10-2004, 07:38 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
But didn't buick rate one of its vehicles always 5-10 hp higher than the vette?
Old 06-10-2004, 07:40 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by pasky
But didn't buick rate one of its vehicles always 5-10 hp higher than the vette?
No.
Old 06-10-2004, 07:47 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
pasky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Could have sworn they did, and every time the corvette upped thier hp rating, buick did the same.
Old 06-10-2004, 07:52 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member
 
br()bert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Its a shame but we have missed out on allot of cool car to save face for the poor vette.
__________________________________________________

Probably the reason why we dont have a 5th gen firebird/camaro.
Old 06-10-2004, 08:03 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by pasky
Could have sworn they did, and every time the corvette upped thier hp rating, buick did the same.
They did but it wasn't higher than the Vette. I'm almost postive lol.
Old 06-10-2004, 09:03 PM
  #19  
Moderator

 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,356
Received 219 Likes on 179 Posts
Wow. If we keep up this kind of talk, the guys running the 735" Merlin blocks might just as well pull them out and scrap them, and install 3-cylinder Geo Prism engines revved to 40,000 RPM.
Buick built the V-6 because Chevrolet was given the task of building all the corporate V-8 gas engines, and frankly, the BOC V-8s weren't "all that" anyway. Pontiac got stuck with inlines, and Olds built diesels. Then the late '80s and early '90s came around, and things just kept changing at GM. But Buick didn't get another V-8 to build. Chevrolet got more of the V-6s, and also resurrected the 134 inline 4 from the early '60s into a modern, efficient, low emission engine - somewhat like what Buick did to the mid-'60s 231 V-6 some years before.

Their powertrain group was all folded into working on the Northstar, and the rest is now just past history. If you want a GM V-8, it isn't likely to have a distributor at the front any time soon. However, some of that lives on, since much of the design of the LS-series engines incorporates what was best in all GM engines through the years. And the 231 has never been more in demand.
Old 06-11-2004, 07:17 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
PETE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: In the corner of my mind!
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 TTA #1240
Engine: 3.8 SFI turbo
Transmission: 2004r
Axle/Gears: 3.27
They also wanted to create a powerplant capable of passing emissions easily, getting very good gas mileage, and had a decent power to weight ratio. They couldn't use big blocks anymore and they prolly wouldn't have fit any way. The Grand Nationals look big but the engine bay with the v6 turbo in it is still kinda tight by the firewall where the dp goes. This engine was never supossed to do what people are doing to them. In fact it took a lot of cash and time for pontiac to R&D the swap into the firebird that sent the cost skyrocketing past $31,000. Today it'd prolly cost you around $42,000 to have GM make it again. The 80's Great engineering, Great Presidents, Horrible clothes and hair, but I'd still go back............................




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.