I think its impossible...
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9-Bolt, with 3.42 Gears
I think its impossible...
Is it impossible to put every single horse power from your crank to the ground? If so what would have to be done?
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Re: I think its impossible...
Originally posted by MakeitQuick92RS
Is it impossible to put every single horse power from your crank to the ground? If so what would have to be done?
Is it impossible to put every single horse power from your crank to the ground? If so what would have to be done?
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
no way to get EVERY hp
to do that though (in a theoretical world) you would have to remove all friction from the bearings in the transmission,rear end, axles, wheels, and such
you would all have to reduce any and all losses from air resistance
the parts wouldh ave to have NO mass/weight to reduce inertial loss
so yeah
not going to happen
to do that though (in a theoretical world) you would have to remove all friction from the bearings in the transmission,rear end, axles, wheels, and such
you would all have to reduce any and all losses from air resistance
the parts wouldh ave to have NO mass/weight to reduce inertial loss
so yeah
not going to happen
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Just bolt a tire to each end of the crank shaft and learn to balance real well.
Last edited by Gumby; Jun 21, 2004 at 09:54 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by V6sucker
depends on the engine. Jet engines are probly the closest.
depends on the engine. Jet engines are probly the closest.
anything that has a tranny or any kind of weight to turn or anything like that, you'll lose some hp.
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by vsixtoy
We get into the sillyest debates on this V6 site.
We get into the sillyest debates on this V6 site.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: Re: I think its impossible...
Originally posted by vsixtoy
Ride horseback
Ride horseback
the horse would still have friction from wind with the legs pumping
the innefficient motion of the horses legs are going to cause some losses
pumping loss from the horses breathing
friction from the horses hooves on the ground
the hairs on the horses legs rubbing against one another forcing some friction
so even that isn't perfect
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Re: Re: I think its impossible...
Originally posted by rx7speed
you would still have losses though
the horse would still have friction from wind with the legs pumping
the innefficient motion of the horses legs are going to cause some losses
pumping loss from the horses breathing
friction from the horses hooves on the ground
the hairs on the horses legs rubbing against one another forcing some friction
so even that isn't perfect
you would still have losses though
the horse would still have friction from wind with the legs pumping
the innefficient motion of the horses legs are going to cause some losses
pumping loss from the horses breathing
friction from the horses hooves on the ground
the hairs on the horses legs rubbing against one another forcing some friction
so even that isn't perfect
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: Re: Re: Re: I think its impossible...
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
but, you've still got one horsepower.
but, you've still got one horsepower.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
so by your logic, you would also have an engine that has an infinite amount of HP. The engine puts out HP at the crank and that is what we are talking about, not getting the actual specific energy of the fuel being used. Looking at it this way, no matter how lumpy the horse is, with it's inherent losses, you are still making 1 HP.
Also, wind resistance doesn't actually change the amount of power that you make, it just changes the amount of power that is used to actually propel the vehicle. If you are putting 300HP to the ground with 0 wind, you are still putting 300 HP down with a 30MPH headwind, you just have to expend more of it to overcome the wind, so you waste some, but it's still put to the ground.
But in answer to the original question...no, it can't be done. You just have to cut your losses and make more power!!!! <insert evil laugh here>
Also, wind resistance doesn't actually change the amount of power that you make, it just changes the amount of power that is used to actually propel the vehicle. If you are putting 300HP to the ground with 0 wind, you are still putting 300 HP down with a 30MPH headwind, you just have to expend more of it to overcome the wind, so you waste some, but it's still put to the ground.
But in answer to the original question...no, it can't be done. You just have to cut your losses and make more power!!!! <insert evil laugh here>
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 2_point8_boy
so by your logic, you would also have an engine that has an infinite amount of HP. The engine puts out HP at the crank and that is what we are talking about, not getting the actual specific energy of the fuel being used. Looking at it this way, no matter how lumpy the horse is, with it's inherent losses, you are still making 1 HP.
Also, wind resistance doesn't actually change the amount of power that you make, it just changes the amount of power that is used to actually propel the vehicle. If you are putting 300HP to the ground with 0 wind, you are still putting 300 HP down with a 30MPH headwind, you just have to expend more of it to overcome the wind, so you waste some, but it's still put to the ground.
But in answer to the original question...no, it can't be done. You just have to cut your losses and make more power!!!! <insert evil laugh here>
so by your logic, you would also have an engine that has an infinite amount of HP. The engine puts out HP at the crank and that is what we are talking about, not getting the actual specific energy of the fuel being used. Looking at it this way, no matter how lumpy the horse is, with it's inherent losses, you are still making 1 HP.
Also, wind resistance doesn't actually change the amount of power that you make, it just changes the amount of power that is used to actually propel the vehicle. If you are putting 300HP to the ground with 0 wind, you are still putting 300 HP down with a 30MPH headwind, you just have to expend more of it to overcome the wind, so you waste some, but it's still put to the ground.
But in answer to the original question...no, it can't be done. You just have to cut your losses and make more power!!!! <insert evil laugh here>
BUT not the real horsepower used in physics
as far as wind resistance it can actually cause a less of power
think about it wind resistance isn't just put on on the front o the object causing it not to move forward as fast
but you also have resistance on the legs or wheels preventing them from turning which would prevent power from being applied to the ground
also on the horse with the hairs on the legs with the wing would cause them to vibrate which could possibly unbalance the motion of the horse causing minute loss in power which even small as it might be still is loss of power
and if you follow the REAL def of horsepower not
it is a horse and there is only one so that is one hp
you aren ot putting all the power to the ground
Banned
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
House power is equated to a medium size horse- just ride a very large horse like a Clydesdale and the subject just became null and void. Fact is, on a large horse under any condition (other than contracting phneomonia) will always put out a definitive 1 HP.
Overclock (Billy), Just for kicks (Horse kicks that is) can we see just how bizarre this can get without locking it. This V6 board never ceases to amaze me.
Overclock (Billy), Just for kicks (Horse kicks that is) can we see just how bizarre this can get without locking it. This V6 board never ceases to amaze me.
Last edited by vsixtoy; Jun 23, 2004 at 12:16 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
true
this is an interesting discussion and getting bizzare as to what we are arguing over
and so far all in good fun no flames or anything yet (stupid vsixtoy boy yeah yeah you heard me STUPID
sorry I had to it's not TGO without the flames
)
the REAL def of horsepower is 33,000lbs/ft per minute
so if a horse was only doing 20,000lbs/ft per minute yes I guess under your def it is still 1 horsepower BUT the real def according most any physics person will tell you that the 33,000lbs/ft per minute is the correct deff
so that horse putting out 20,000lbs/ft per min isn't really putting out a full horsepower even though the horse is the thing doing the powering
this is an interesting discussion and getting bizzare as to what we are arguing over

and so far all in good fun no flames or anything yet (stupid vsixtoy boy yeah yeah you heard me STUPID
sorry I had to it's not TGO without the flames
)the REAL def of horsepower is 33,000lbs/ft per minute
so if a horse was only doing 20,000lbs/ft per minute yes I guess under your def it is still 1 horsepower BUT the real def according most any physics person will tell you that the 33,000lbs/ft per minute is the correct deff
so that horse putting out 20,000lbs/ft per min isn't really putting out a full horsepower even though the horse is the thing doing the powering
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
As long as this doesn't turn into flame city, I don't care how bizarre the conversation gets... it's got a tech aspect... kinda...
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
what a damn goofy discussion. We all need to get laid, we are wasting WAY too much energy on this.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 2_point8_boy
what a damn goofy discussion. We all need to get laid, we are wasting WAY too much energy on this.
what a damn goofy discussion. We all need to get laid, we are wasting WAY too much energy on this.
hey I get laid all the time
but keep this on topic
consider this your first warning 2.8

but vsixtoy you have a reply yet?



