V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

I think its impossible...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #1  
MakeitQuick92RS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Car: 1988 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9-Bolt, with 3.42 Gears
I think its impossible...

Is it impossible to put every single horse power from your crank to the ground? If so what would have to be done?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 06:07 PM
  #2  
Apeiron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Yes it's impossible.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #3  
V6sucker's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 1
Car: a car being parted out
Engine: blown up
Transmission: in peices
depends on the engine. Jet engines are probly the closest.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #4  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
.

ummm....yup what they said...
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #5  
vsixtoy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Re: I think its impossible...

Originally posted by MakeitQuick92RS
Is it impossible to put every single horse power from your crank to the ground? If so what would have to be done?
Ride horseback
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #6  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
no way to get EVERY hp

to do that though (in a theoretical world) you would have to remove all friction from the bearings in the transmission,rear end, axles, wheels, and such

you would all have to reduce any and all losses from air resistance

the parts wouldh ave to have NO mass/weight to reduce inertial loss

so yeah


not going to happen
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 09:48 PM
  #7  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Just bolt a tire to each end of the crank shaft and learn to balance real well.

Last edited by Gumby; Jun 21, 2004 at 09:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 10:08 PM
  #8  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by V6sucker
depends on the engine. Jet engines are probly the closest.
jet engines don't put power to the ground.

anything that has a tranny or any kind of weight to turn or anything like that, you'll lose some hp.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 12:35 AM
  #9  
vsixtoy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
We get into the sillyest debates on this V6 site.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 01:45 PM
  #10  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by vsixtoy
We get into the sillyest debates on this V6 site.
lol...i'm sorry. i just had to throw that last post in there.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 02:05 PM
  #11  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Re: Re: I think its impossible...

Originally posted by vsixtoy
Ride horseback
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #12  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: Re: I think its impossible...

Originally posted by vsixtoy
Ride horseback
you would still have losses though
the horse would still have friction from wind with the legs pumping
the innefficient motion of the horses legs are going to cause some losses
pumping loss from the horses breathing
friction from the horses hooves on the ground
the hairs on the horses legs rubbing against one another forcing some friction


so even that isn't perfect
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 03:52 PM
  #13  
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Re: Re: I think its impossible...

Originally posted by rx7speed
you would still have losses though
the horse would still have friction from wind with the legs pumping
the innefficient motion of the horses legs are going to cause some losses
pumping loss from the horses breathing
friction from the horses hooves on the ground
the hairs on the horses legs rubbing against one another forcing some friction


so even that isn't perfect
but, you've still got one horsepower.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 04:19 PM
  #14  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: Re: Re: Re: I think its impossible...

Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
but, you've still got one horsepower.
maybe so but you still have loss and not all of it goes to the ground
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #15  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
so by your logic, you would also have an engine that has an infinite amount of HP. The engine puts out HP at the crank and that is what we are talking about, not getting the actual specific energy of the fuel being used. Looking at it this way, no matter how lumpy the horse is, with it's inherent losses, you are still making 1 HP.

Also, wind resistance doesn't actually change the amount of power that you make, it just changes the amount of power that is used to actually propel the vehicle. If you are putting 300HP to the ground with 0 wind, you are still putting 300 HP down with a 30MPH headwind, you just have to expend more of it to overcome the wind, so you waste some, but it's still put to the ground.

But in answer to the original question...no, it can't be done. You just have to cut your losses and make more power!!!! <insert evil laugh here>
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2004 | 11:25 PM
  #16  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 2_point8_boy
so by your logic, you would also have an engine that has an infinite amount of HP. The engine puts out HP at the crank and that is what we are talking about, not getting the actual specific energy of the fuel being used. Looking at it this way, no matter how lumpy the horse is, with it's inherent losses, you are still making 1 HP.

Also, wind resistance doesn't actually change the amount of power that you make, it just changes the amount of power that is used to actually propel the vehicle. If you are putting 300HP to the ground with 0 wind, you are still putting 300 HP down with a 30MPH headwind, you just have to expend more of it to overcome the wind, so you waste some, but it's still put to the ground.

But in answer to the original question...no, it can't be done. You just have to cut your losses and make more power!!!! <insert evil laugh here>
ah yes 1 horse might still be putting out 1 hp in the easy way

BUT not the real horsepower used in physics
as far as wind resistance it can actually cause a less of power
think about it wind resistance isn't just put on on the front o the object causing it not to move forward as fast
but you also have resistance on the legs or wheels preventing them from turning which would prevent power from being applied to the ground
also on the horse with the hairs on the legs with the wing would cause them to vibrate which could possibly unbalance the motion of the horse causing minute loss in power which even small as it might be still is loss of power

and if you follow the REAL def of horsepower not
it is a horse and there is only one so that is one hp
you aren ot putting all the power to the ground
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 12:14 AM
  #17  
vsixtoy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
From: Orange, Calif
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
House power is equated to a medium size horse- just ride a very large horse like a Clydesdale and the subject just became null and void. Fact is, on a large horse under any condition (other than contracting phneomonia) will always put out a definitive 1 HP.

Overclock (Billy), Just for kicks (Horse kicks that is) can we see just how bizarre this can get without locking it. This V6 board never ceases to amaze me.

Last edited by vsixtoy; Jun 23, 2004 at 12:16 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 02:23 AM
  #18  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
true
this is an interesting discussion and getting bizzare as to what we are arguing over

and so far all in good fun no flames or anything yet (stupid vsixtoy boy yeah yeah you heard me STUPID sorry I had to it's not TGO without the flames )


the REAL def of horsepower is 33,000lbs/ft per minute

so if a horse was only doing 20,000lbs/ft per minute yes I guess under your def it is still 1 horsepower BUT the real def according most any physics person will tell you that the 33,000lbs/ft per minute is the correct deff

so that horse putting out 20,000lbs/ft per min isn't really putting out a full horsepower even though the horse is the thing doing the powering
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 05:20 AM
  #19  
TechSmurf's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
As long as this doesn't turn into flame city, I don't care how bizarre the conversation gets... it's got a tech aspect... kinda...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 05:30 AM
  #20  
Nocturnall's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 191ci 6cyl
Transmission: 700r4
2_point8_boy your quote is in accurate but good response.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 09:14 PM
  #21  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
what a damn goofy discussion. We all need to get laid, we are wasting WAY too much energy on this.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 10:59 PM
  #22  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 2_point8_boy
what a damn goofy discussion. We all need to get laid, we are wasting WAY too much energy on this.

hey I get laid all the time

but keep this on topic

consider this your first warning 2.8


but vsixtoy you have a reply yet?
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:14 AM.