4.3 liter v6
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Amherst, OH
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Auto.
4.3 liter v6
This is an interesting question. Why didn't they use the 4.3 4bbl in the 3rd gen v6 camaros instead of the crappy 2.8's?
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 1
From: Central FL
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
welcome to the boards but please don't come in this board and make a post like that with your information showing that you own a V8, that's what is called trolling. anyways, i don't know exactly why they used the 60degree v6 instead of the 4.3s. but, i do know from experience that they 4.3s are much more expensive to mod.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Car: Firebird'95
Engine: L-32 (3,4L V6)
Transmission: T5 Borg Warner
Re: 4.3 liter v6
Originally posted by cmro92_rs305
This is an interesting question. Why didn't they use the 4.3 4bbl in the 3rd gen v6 camaros instead of the crappy 2.8's?
This is an interesting question. Why didn't they use the 4.3 4bbl in the 3rd gen v6 camaros instead of the crappy 2.8's?
Bore. Bore. Bore. Bore. Bore.
96.52 96.774 97.028 97.282 97.536
Str. 86.36 3792 3812 3831 3851 3873
Str. 87.63 3848 3868 3887 3909 3928
Str. 88.9 3904 3923 3945 3964 3986
Str. 90.17 3959 3979 4001 4022 4043
Str. 91.44 4015 4036 4058 4079 4101
Str. 92.71 4071 4092 4114 4135 4156
Str. 93.98 4127 4148 4169 4192 4214
Str. 95.25 4183 4204 4227 4248 4271
Str. 96.52 4238 4260 4283 4305 4328
Str. 97.79 4294 4317 4338 4361 4384
Str. 99.06 4350 4373 4396 4419 4442
Str. 100.33 4405 4428 4451 4474 4499
Str. 101.6 4461 4484 4509 4532 4555
This table for 3,8 V6 engine! All values in millimeter and cubic centimetre.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Beach, Ca
Car: Gutted 92' RS TRACK ONLY / '86 Mustang gt 'vert / 1982 Yamiaha xs400 Cafe Racer
Engine: L03; TBI is IT! / 5.0HO (306) SFI / 400cc air cooled twin
Transmission: 700-r4 / WCT5/ 6-speed close ratio
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
"please don't come in this board and make a post like that with your information showing that you own a V8, that's what is called trolling."
Whoh. So you are saying don't post on v6 boards if you don't have a v6? Sorry but I don't agree with you. If you have a question, or can answer someone elses question you can post. How do you know he didn't have a v6 before he got the v8?
"please don't come in this board and make a post like that with your information showing that you own a V8, that's what is called trolling."
Whoh. So you are saying don't post on v6 boards if you don't have a v6? Sorry but I don't agree with you. If you have a question, or can answer someone elses question you can post. How do you know he didn't have a v6 before he got the v8?
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
....grrrr..... Anyhow, the reason for using it was becasue the early 4.3 was a boat anchor. The 2.8L is too, but it's a much lighter, higer revving boat anchor
The 60* V6 is a compact powerhouse, the 4.3 was just a 350 minus 2 cylinders (with crappier heads). The old 4.3's were nothing like teh Vortec 4.3's of today, they made as much power as the 2.8, but were heavy. I've asked the same question though. You'd think GM would prefer not ahving to build two different bellhousings for the 700r4 in our cars...
The 60* V6 is a compact powerhouse, the 4.3 was just a 350 minus 2 cylinders (with crappier heads). The old 4.3's were nothing like teh Vortec 4.3's of today, they made as much power as the 2.8, but were heavy. I've asked the same question though. You'd think GM would prefer not ahving to build two different bellhousings for the 700r4 in our cars...
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Northern New Jersey
Car: Chevy Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: V6 2.8L
Transmission: Automatic
Even when the 2.8 has less HP than the 305 TPI or 350, the 2.8 MPI has 135 HP, the 305 carb has 155 HP.....what is the big different between them?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by watafo
Even when the 2.8 has less HP than the 305 TPI or 350, the 2.8 MPI has 135 HP, the 305 carb has 155 HP.....what is the big different between them?
Even when the 2.8 has less HP than the 305 TPI or 350, the 2.8 MPI has 135 HP, the 305 carb has 155 HP.....what is the big different between them?
BUT, they both suck without a LOT of modifications (Apparently GM can get 300 hp out of a 2.8L with head work and a different cam......scary) Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
There were 2 different 3.8s, as well - 229ci and 231ci.
The 2.8 was GM's black horse racing motor - I kid you not, go see what they used in the midget racing, and some outdoor motors.
The 60º V6 is naturally balanced - allowing quite the rev potential, if a properly lightened and strong enough valvetrain/rotating assembly are used.
Also, our intake SUCKS. Guys, I think the turbo dyno graphs proved that one
But rest assured, I'm already at work on that little problem - and as soon as it's done, it'll be ready to go immediately in production (as it'll be much cheaper to build/sell than the turbo kits!)
The 2.8 was GM's black horse racing motor - I kid you not, go see what they used in the midget racing, and some outdoor motors.
The 60º V6 is naturally balanced - allowing quite the rev potential, if a properly lightened and strong enough valvetrain/rotating assembly are used.
Also, our intake SUCKS. Guys, I think the turbo dyno graphs proved that one

But rest assured, I'm already at work on that little problem - and as soon as it's done, it'll be ready to go immediately in production (as it'll be much cheaper to build/sell than the turbo kits!)
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by Doward
There were 2 different 3.8s, as well - 229ci and 231ci.
The 2.8 was GM's black horse racing motor - I kid you not, go see what they used in the midget racing, and some outdoor motors.
The 60º V6 is naturally balanced - allowing quite the rev potential, if a properly lightened and strong enough valvetrain/rotating assembly are used.
Also, our intake SUCKS. Guys, I think the turbo dyno graphs proved that one
But rest assured, I'm already at work on that little problem - and as soon as it's done, it'll be ready to go immediately in production (as it'll be much cheaper to build/sell than the turbo kits!)
There were 2 different 3.8s, as well - 229ci and 231ci.
The 2.8 was GM's black horse racing motor - I kid you not, go see what they used in the midget racing, and some outdoor motors.
The 60º V6 is naturally balanced - allowing quite the rev potential, if a properly lightened and strong enough valvetrain/rotating assembly are used.
Also, our intake SUCKS. Guys, I think the turbo dyno graphs proved that one

But rest assured, I'm already at work on that little problem - and as soon as it's done, it'll be ready to go immediately in production (as it'll be much cheaper to build/sell than the turbo kits!)
The 4.3 is a great Idea for an fbody. Check out this link.
http://hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/113_0210_blown/
and
http://hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/113_0208_v6
http://hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/113_0210_blown/
and
http://hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/113_0208_v6
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
LOL, that V6 makes more power than 98% of the cars on this site. That's a rather extensive build though too. I'll keep my 60* motor, those 4.3's idle a bit too rough for my taste (as if my engine idles smooth
).
). Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Originally posted by FbodTrek
Amen to that. What are you guestimating the price to be? -(opens wallet and counts money)-
Amen to that. What are you guestimating the price to be? -(opens wallet and counts money)-
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Originally posted by Project: 85 2.8 bird
or put THIS 4.3 i your third gen
or put THIS 4.3 i your third gen
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Car: traded away 94 v6
Engine: vacant
Transmission: also vacant
I'm in the process of building up a 4.3L v6, although it's going into a 4th gen. Have a low mileage roller from an 88 S10, not the best but its in great shape, and I'm looking to throw a set of stock Dodge Stealth turbo's on it (should be getting them in a few months if everything pans out), using a small mechanical secondary 450cfm Holley carb, mild porting to the stock heads and a stock cam. Hoping for about 320hp or so, give or take 10.
When I have more money, I intend to have the crank welded and offset ground to 3.18 stroke, use a thinned 6" sbc rod and dished sbc pistons, ported vortec heads, mild cam and a homemade intake I've been working on. Should be good for 450hp and 7000rpm if I get a rev kit, or use solid lifters.
Now, the only hitch is......I can't find ANY dists. for these things, and I don't wanna use the stock truck ecm to control a shatty dist.
When I have more money, I intend to have the crank welded and offset ground to 3.18 stroke, use a thinned 6" sbc rod and dished sbc pistons, ported vortec heads, mild cam and a homemade intake I've been working on. Should be good for 450hp and 7000rpm if I get a rev kit, or use solid lifters.
Now, the only hitch is......I can't find ANY dists. for these things, and I don't wanna use the stock truck ecm to control a shatty dist.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





