V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

While We Were On Commercial.. (doward requested)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 04:16 PM
  #1  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
While We Were On Commercial.. (doward requested)

I found out my cam lobe on #1 intake was flattened. And cam lobe on #1 exhaust was partly gone.

So I picked up an MTC-5 cam. Going out to install it in about 10 min now that family left.

Should I set timing at 10, or am I reading the box to this correctly that it needs to be set to 27??
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #2  
69charger383's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: 2005 Lincoln LS, 83' Z28
Engine: 242 DOHC and an empty engine bay.
Transmission: 5R55S, T5 soon to be auto
Axle/Gears: 3.58s and soon to be 4.10s
Go with the box hahaha
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
Naft's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
ahhh, that sucks, all that fiddling with the fuel and it was a damn camshaft . . . at least you got it now.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 07:33 PM
  #4  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65










Also, has anyone payed attention. When the two "ticks" on the timing chain are lined up, is the dizzy on 4? Or did I re-stab it wrong even though I marked it before I pulled it.

Yea, sucky with the fuel and all the spark stuff. But I did notice some improvment with all of it. Even with a fubar cam, I was still getting some respectable mpg.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #5  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally Posted by Dale
Also, has anyone payed attention. When the two "ticks" on the timing chain are lined up, is the dizzy on 4? Or did I re-stab it wrong even though I marked it before I pulled it.

Yea, sucky with the fuel and all the spark stuff. But I did notice some improvment with all of it. Even with a fubar cam, I was still getting some respectable mpg.
With the tick marks lined up that is #4 compression stroke (firing). After sprockets are on turn the crank 1 revolution. That is #1 firing (both tick marks at 12 o'clock).

Interesting about the lobes. The reason I say this is that way back when the bad running issue happened, it was within 10 seconds of fueling up. Which makes me think: did the lobes wipe then and there, or did they wipe later as a result of something else? Probably never know. How is the oil pressure, maybe put a mech gauge on it just to check it.

Here's to good luck,

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 10:40 PM
  #6  
2_point8_boy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 1
From: Castaic, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L of Raw POWER!!!
Transmission: Stick Shift
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
Now the real challenge will be to find out why that lobe got worked down like that. It would be a shame for you to install a new cam and flatten that one because of an oil delivery problem.

See what you can do about priming the system BEFORE you button everything up, just to be sure that oil is getting up to that cam lobe.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 03:53 AM
  #7  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I have seen that several times in engines. Driving fast, racing it hard and just a bit to low on oil, to often kills them front parts.

one of the reason I run full on oil running, not off n cold. So I am full with oil in the top end. only ends up being half quart or so over after a sittin cold check.

Then some folks run only 4 quarts for extra speed but them poor poor front of the motor parts. Ill give up a few HP for good oilin, just make it up in better drivin.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 05:41 AM
  #8  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I have read the 3.4 is known for bad cams. Also, I had found a rocker all cocked some time ago, pulled it off and fixed it. Didnt know it would cause a bad cam lobe.

I also run my engine slightly over full with oil (.5 qt or so) because of the way I attempt to sling it around cornors.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #9  
Blue1989RS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
When I built my motor, the machinist had me run the oil pump until oil came out of the pushrods. It was easy to do, just hook a drill up to the octagonal rod that runs down to the oil pump, and spin a way (insert cam and lifters first....)
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #10  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally Posted by Blue1989RS
When I built my motor, the machinist had me run the oil pump until oil came out of the pushrods. It was easy to do, just hook a drill up to the octagonal rod that runs down to the oil pump, and spin a way (insert cam and lifters first....)
T, I'll give you a call later tonight to see how to do that.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #11  
Blue1989RS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
Oh yeah, and don't forget to use GOBS of assy lube. And you also have to change the oil after the cam breaks in. I think I broke my new motor in at 3kRPM for 15 minutes, and then did another 15 at 4k or something. But I was breaking in new bearings, pistons, everything. I think the cam manu will have instructions.

Yeay! Dale got a new cam!
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 11:08 PM
  #12  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
dale, let me know how the cam is, mine is going in hopefully this weekend or next. ive also mildly ported the heads and intake and bowl blended the heads. and those lovely poly motor mounts doward found for us.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #13  
railroad's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Jay, just pull the coil wire and crank the starter until the oil pressure comes up on the gauge. Then reinstall the coil wire and fire the engine.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #14  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Dave, I thought you already installed it? I didnt see anything about motor mounts either. Anyway, I am not sure this cam is really what I'm looking for. It said truck/rv cam. yet when I put the profile in DDD, the peak torque is up in the 3krpm range, and peak hp is almost redline. I was looking for a tq range of approx 2500.

railroad, did that, but I was checking to make sure all my rockers were installed properly, and nothing would hit. So far so good.

Check list for tonight:
mount EGR
install vac gauge
install air intake
install injector fuses
connect battery
mount pass fan back up
install #1 plug n wire

keep fingers crossed and fire it up
check timing
install antifreeze

Last edited by Dale; Mar 21, 2006 at 07:15 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #15  
85berlinetta2.8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: IROC Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
any way to improve oil delivery? maybe grind the oil galleys larger?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 07:16 AM
  #16  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally Posted by 85berlinetta2.8
any way to improve oil delivery? maybe grind the oil galleys larger?
I was shown by a person who posted in this thread, that when you fully rebuild an engine, you can smooth down the vally where the lifters sit in. You start changing the dia of the oil passages, and your messing with pressure n volume.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #17  
Blue1989RS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
I have the GM Power Book that shows the oil galley done. Another thing they did was to glue a screen down to cover the cam incase a piece of metal goes down to the galley. Check your local autocross rules, they don't allow aftermarket cams up here until you get into a Prepared class. But I think thats where you are anyways.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #18  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Well, got it started tonight.

Set timing, some how bumped it back down to 2deg tightening it. I said f-it and left it there and started filling coolent.

Took it for a drive, this thing revs to 4 and 5k rpms so smooth!! I wasnt even trying to do that.

Had to cancel test drive early as I have a major valve cover gasket it leak on the left side. Finding parts tommorow to fix that.

YES!!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 09:29 PM
  #19  
Naft's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
awesome! get that timing back up and you should feel a lot more power too, lol.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #20  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
no i havent gotten it in yet, working 70hrs a week has killed any progress, but thats all done with as of tonight. thursday night im going to get going on putting it all back together, and hopefully running by this weekend, seems like you like the cam, good.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #21  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
I don't wanna rain on your parade, but every time I've wiped a cam lobe the resulting metal ended up in the bearings. How is your oil pressure?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #22  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
oil pressure is fine, same as all my other 6/60's I've had.

I did have a rocker fail on here almost a year ago. Same lobe/valve. I wonder if that started it.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #23  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
damn, that engine of yours...................

who had the lobe wipe on them earlier & finally got GM to repair under warranty? I'll put up a post in fv6 asking if any of them have had probs w/the 3.4 cams crapping out.

side note, I don't see how one rocker failing would destroy both lobes .....
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2006 | 08:43 PM
  #24  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
damn the engine of mine? More like your engine!!! So what was the warranty on this thing


Offical word, bang for the buck this is a good cam. I was looking for little more low end torque. Maybe I will get that when I set it to proper timing.


Got a code 45 letting it idle in the driveway while I cleaned the garage. Kinda hoping thats it blowing all the carbon buildup in the cylinders out. If not, I'll have to work on that. Going to take it to work tommorow
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #25  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
that was my engine two engines ago and it ran (despite the fried electronics)

you'll still be able to trounce my bird, as I'll still be happy jsut to get it tagged & running, not in that order either.


How does the cam you have now compare to an S-10's spec? a bit more torque but no top end I bet.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #26  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
s10 had alot more low end torque, but zilch for top end.

This cam is more top end/freeway speeds.

However, its a nice smooth climb(have yet to find the fall off point), where before it was a quick climb, then fell off.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #27  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Ok, so the forums are up now?

Yep, the MTC-5 cam, imho, was a great little add on. I noticed better power all the way up the powerband!

I set mine to 12º BTDC, btw

Don't know where they got 27º...

Last edited by Doward; Mar 29, 2006 at 11:59 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:58 PM
  #28  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally Posted by Doward
Don't know where they got 27º...
Intake valve opening point?

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #29  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Wow, late post.

New cam is already waxed as well. I will more then likely start parting my car out after the weekend.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 09:40 PM
  #30  
drdave88's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 6
From: Waterford, MI
Car: 1998 Camaro Z28
Engine: 6.0L
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.73
its shot already!!??? WTF is going on w/ that thing? id check more into it before you junk it dude, dont leave us dale!!!!!!

but if youre gonna part it out, i want dibs on the suspension stuff, lol.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 02:33 AM
  #31  
Naft's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
New cam is already waxed as well. I will more then likely start parting my car out after the weekend.
WTF man, im really sorry. Think it over man, and if your sure you want to part it out, ill do what i can to help you get a new 3rd.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #32  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Dave, yes the new cam is already shot. As Monte up above said, I have oil issues. As well as all the debris is in the oil system untill you clean the entire system. Since I dont have the tools to do that(hoist, tank dip clean, replace bearings n seals), I'm not going to dump more cash into this car when its not what I really want. By time I get that done I will be pushing close to 10g's in this car. Its not worth that. I've spent almost 1g trying to find out what the problem is over the past 5 months!

I will say, the 2 days it ran right, holy $hit did this thing scream I seriously think it would have kept up with my GTP

I will be keeping my suspension parts untill I find my next toy car. But you already called dibs so I'll keep you in mind


Cars I'm looking to replace it with in order provided the money person allows this. Keep in mind I really dont have any extra cash above what I can get parting it out. I have all the tools in the world to do external engine and replace body panels.
90-92 Camaro Convert
98-02 Bird/TA convert or T-top
98-02 Camaro Convert
Classic vette, pre 1973, Convert or t-top
Eclipse/Talon Convert AWD Turbo
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #33  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 234
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally Posted by Dale
Wow, late post.

New cam is already waxed as well. I will more then likely start parting my car out after the weekend.
Ouch (insert favorite string of 4 letter words). There has to be something binding in the valve train. Check the valve setup in the heads for clearance: retainer to guide/seal and springs for coil bind. Then the actual spring pressure, it may be excessive.

Also check the rocker slot to stud clearance at full lift. Many years ago I got caught on that one. Was a SBC I put a mild cam in (.445" lift), along with some moderate springs to match. After a while it would start tapping a little. So I readjusted the valves. Started tapping again and found that the rocker studs were pulling out of the head, just a tad.

No problem, so I pinned them. The tapping came back. But it was only after an excursion to high RPMs. Hmm, now I find that the push rods are ever so slightly bent. Replace them and later those are ever so slightly bent.

Somethings not right. With some work I found the end of the rocker arm slots with ever so slight marks in them. And the rocker studs too. replaced the rockers with a long slot version along with another new set of pushrods and all was well.


The only other issue I see is the oil system. If the filter bypass is operational (not plugged) you may need to pull the engine and clean the metal out of it.

RBob.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 07:56 AM
  #34  
Doward's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, FL
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Oh hell... I know I didn't mention it before, but you DID replace the valve springs, correct? I recommended (well, Melling does, too! ) VS-380s installed @ 1.72"

If you re-used stock-style springs, without any extra coil clearance, it is very possible you wiped the lobe based on that.

Another thing to consider - what condition, and orientation, are your camshaft bearings in?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #35  
Dale's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I have crane 99948 springs, and 99915 retainers per suggestion of a board member.

My pushrods are clear and strait, not bent or plugged.

Clearence on rocker slot, its almost identical setup to what several other board members have. Why would it not work on my car? But I do see what your talking about.

Stud shafts are not loose(checked that already).

Cam bearings. Dont know how to check them or what to even look for.

If the engine comes out, its not going back in.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #36  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
damn dude, I'm sorry to hear that. I feel your pain on dumping too much $$$ into the car (engine mostly) .............grrrrrrr....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992Z28!
Camaros for Sale
3
Nov 19, 2015 07:33 AM
tonys91rs
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Oct 10, 2015 03:31 PM
82xCAMAROxZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 27, 2015 12:31 AM
327IROC85
Electronics
8
Sep 23, 2015 12:11 AM
funkyTA
Firebirds for Sale
0
Sep 10, 2015 06:38 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.