Hooker Cat-Back

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 20, 2001 | 02:48 PM

PimpRide92

Thread Starter

Junior Member

Joined: Jan 2001

Posts: 89

Likes: 0

From: Maryland

Hooker Cat-Back

They have a catback system for a 305 non HO with 3" piping i believe? Will this work on my 3.1?? Or should i get the Dynomax catback?

------------------
1992 RS 3.1L
2 - Kicker XPL
Eclipse 2-Channel Amp
Sony Head Unit
Window Tint

Kill's:
80's Stang 4-Cyl, A few Ricers, Ford Tempo(Weak)
'91 OR '92 Z28(Dont Ask Me How) All On A Mesh Up Tranny!

[This message has been edited by PimpRide92 (edited March 20, 2001).]

Mar 21, 2001 | 07:23 AM

Brian K

Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 1999

Posts: 1,218

Likes: 1

From: Orlando,Fl, USA

I am for the Dynomax kit for a few reasons. First, I have it and love it. It has als lasted a long time and still looks new. Second, I like to support people who make products specific to our 2.8 and 3.1 engines so they continue to make them or possibly develop newer ones. Yes the hooker might work and be very nice, but support those who support our cars and buy their products....

Mar 21, 2001 | 01:47 PM

TomP

Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2000

Posts: 13,414

Likes: 6

From: Central NJ, USA

Car: 1986 Firebird

Engine: 2.8 V6

Transmission: 700R4

The #17493 Dynomax system is also made for the "305 V8, not engine codes H or E". I believe H or E meant high-output. I'm with Brian on liking the Dynomax, but I don't think any 2.8'er has tried the Hooker system yet! It'd get points for being unique, that's for sure!

------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!