Car opinions
Car opinions
i know this isn't really tech, but you all in the v6 board have been the most helpful with my camaro. it doesn't say much, but what do you think about this deal on a firebird: http://www.autotrader.com/findacar/v...model=FBIRD&di stance=30&car_year=1986&ac_afflt=none
sorry for such a big link... any opinions would be appreciated.
------------------
'91 Camaro RS, Fresh Paint Job, K&N Filter, Twin Turbo Hood, Soon to have Hooker Cat-back
sorry for such a big link... any opinions would be appreciated.
------------------
'91 Camaro RS, Fresh Paint Job, K&N Filter, Twin Turbo Hood, Soon to have Hooker Cat-back
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T5
NICE! Only 50,000 on the ENGINE....which means it has more miles than that on the car. Watch out for other stuff like worn suspension and drivetrain. Although, he's not asking that much.... Maybe it's a formula? Because firebirds didn't come with a 350. Did formulas back then?
------------------
1992 Polo Green RS 3.1L K&N conical and working on the ram air....
"Yeah, it's a V6 SO WHAT!?"
[This message has been edited by elevario (edited September 28, 2001).]
------------------
1992 Polo Green RS 3.1L K&N conical and working on the ram air....
"Yeah, it's a V6 SO WHAT!?"
[This message has been edited by elevario (edited September 28, 2001).]
my guess is he/she just threw it under the heading firebird, because it's a more recognizable name to people who don't know about the differences of the two. it looks nice, and it's t-tops. i plan on taking a look at it, so i can check out the condition the rest of the car is in, but yeah, it still seems like a really good deal
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM
1992 Trans Am
Suspension and Chassis
1
Aug 9, 2015 04:32 PM




