V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Cost for power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 12:46 PM
  #1  
PMHSSOCCER6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 Firebird base
Engine: 3.1l v6
Cost for power

Note: I have read all the important posts and searched the forums before making a post.
Just bought a 92 firebird 3.1l. I want to improve my performance, mainly acceleration. I have a limited budget to work with and the way I see it, I can either make many performance improvements to my car (leaving in its current engine) or I can swap in a v8 but only have enough leftover for just a few small mods. I don't have money for both atm. Which will give me better acceleration for my money? (By performance improvements, in case there was any question, I mean new exhaust, new intake, lighter wheels and driveshaft, better heads, chip).
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #2  
PMHSSOCCER6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 Firebird base
Engine: 3.1l v6
Re: Cost for power

Edit: Or a higher-performance v6 I suppose
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 05:33 PM
  #3  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

personally, id go with a v8. mostly for the long run. you can buy performacne parts for a sbc at about the third of the price of these v6's

i was considering the same thing. but i overall decided if i was hellbent on good performance id go for the v8. i am mostly keeping the v6 because i already have a replacement v6 and the performance parts i want arent totally out of budget.

long story short, how far do you want to go with it?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 06:06 PM
  #4  
jensen73110's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: Cost for power

^Right. What are you looking for? 14 second quarter mile? Keep the 6. 13s? Keep the 6. 10s? Probably should go v8 or it's gonna get expensive.

What does limited budget mean? $300 or $5000.
What's your skill level?
Shop/garage?
Tools?
Time?
Only car?

There's more than just power to consider....
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #5  
58mark's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 6
From: Mesquite, Texas
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: Cost for power

if you have to have speed, you never should have bought a V6. It's always smarter to just buy the V8 you'll wanted in the first place.

I'm not saying a V6 can't be made faster, but it's not easy or cheap.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 06:31 PM
  #6  
ex-x-fire's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 4
Re: Cost for power

Get a cat back system, most performance cat backs are for both v6 & v8s.
Change the rear axle ratio to a 3.73 ratio.
To change to a v8 you'll need a different tranny, radiator, accesory brackets, rad hoses, & all the stuff that'll nickle & dime ya'.
A 3.4 (camaro) swap w/ a few mods like headers & cam might be what your looking for, its a direct swap.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 06:49 PM
  #7  
PMHSSOCCER6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 Firebird base
Engine: 3.1l v6
Re: Cost for power

I got the v6 because it was a good deal on ebay and my funds are quite limited. My thought was get that while I could and at least have a car and then upgrade as money allowed. Limited budget in this case is as much of my leftover financial aid I can spend without my parents killing me so for the present time I have about 1k to work with. Skill level, well, meh, but I have highly skilled friends that can help me. I have access to the tools at an auto repair shop, the main guy there is a friend and probably has all the tools I would need as he has made multiple hot rods. Time, at least 10 hrs during the week and all weekend if needed. Only car, well it is the only car in my name but I still live at home, I have other vehicle options no problem. My goal is low 14s-high 13s.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 07:04 PM
  #8  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

a 3.4 is a good option too, i am not sure how itll do in the quater but the cat back is definately a good idea. i just still cant get over the price of parts for these dang things. 500 dollars for a holley carb, 275 dollar to wrap up in intake pieces, 437 dollars for headers, like 350 for a cat back, and 320 for a cam kit. thats around $2000 for what? just over 200 horse?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 07:08 PM
  #9  
jensen73110's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma City
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi
Re: Cost for power

Judging by that ^, I'd throw some nitrous at it and call it good. It's well within budget, can be done in a day, will get you a lot closer to your goal, and could someday work with a v8.
Then, do minor upgrades that help performance, but could still work with a v8, if you decide to go that route. Better rear end gears and diff, cat back exhaust, and so on.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 07:20 PM
  #10  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by jensen73110
Judging by that ^, I'd throw some nitrous at it and call it good. It's well within budget, can be done in a day, will get you a lot closer to your goal, and could someday work with a v8.
Then, do minor upgrades that help performance, but could still work with a v8, if you decide to go that route. Better rear end gears and diff, cat back exhaust, and so on.
nitrous is a good choice too. much less money and much easier. me personally, i feel like nitrous is cheating. feels lazy to me (nothing against those who use it) im still in the air about the v6 or v8 thing myself. it is alot of work to put in a v8 so if you go that route, be prepared. but a 3.4 can do well too. its 160 horse and bolts right up.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #11  
fasteddi's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: Cost for power

In my opinion nitrous is the same as a turbo.. at least it accomplished the same thing as a turbo in the same principals. So im young and in my mind its not cheeting.

My opinion.... turbo if you have the $$/skill/and time. If not nitrous. A safe wet 75 shot will get you in the 14s or 15's depending on you skill at the track and other aspects of your car, and will only cost about 600 or $700 for a new kit with proper safty stuff. I.E. Blowdown line, rpm window, and bottle heater/guage.

The turbo is alot harder in my opinion, im in the slow process of the turbo option, its hard to have the time to dedicate to do the nessasary fabrications but there is a ton of info on this site about that route of the turbo and what can be achieved. But in my opinion, is THE BEST option for power in the V6 thirdgens.

Also check up on the hybrid top end swap.

But by your experience in this, i would think that the easiest Hp and cheepest Hp would be the nitrous, but read up on it for a bit before you buy it or you WILL be putting a new motor in your car because the nitrous killed your old one.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #12  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Cost for power

You have a lot of options with the V6, and way more with a V8. Most however will far exceed your budget.


In your case i'd agree, a wet nitrous kit seems logical.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:35 PM
  #13  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by fasteddi
In my opinion nitrous is the same as a turbo.. at least it accomplished the same thing as a turbo in the same principals. So im young and in my mind its not cheeting.

My opinion.... turbo if you have the $$/skill/and time. If not nitrous. A safe wet 75 shot will get you in the 14s or 15's depending on you skill at the track and other aspects of your car, and will only cost about 600 or $700 for a new kit with proper safty stuff. I.E. Blowdown line, rpm window, and bottle heater/guage.

The turbo is alot harder in my opinion, im in the slow process of the turbo option, its hard to have the time to dedicate to do the nessasary fabrications but there is a ton of info on this site about that route of the turbo and what can be achieved. But in my opinion, is THE BEST option for power in the V6 thirdgens.

Also check up on the hybrid top end swap.

But by your experience in this, i would think that the easiest Hp and cheepest Hp would be the nitrous, but read up on it for a bit before you buy it or you WILL be putting a new motor in your car because the nitrous killed your old one.
lol, im not an old man, im 19. i just dont like the idea of nitous, it is like crack for engines. and like crack, it can really f**k stuff up
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #14  
PMHSSOCCER6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 Firebird base
Engine: 3.1l v6
Re: Cost for power

Ok, so what I'm seeing for the near future is a swap to a 3.4, exhaust and other performance upgrades, and a wet nitrous system. Can't buy it all at once of course but then that gives me time to install the parts as I buy them. Eventually, when I have the money and experience (aka after I finally find some work in my wretched little town), I'm going to drop in a v8 and get a turbo, along with all the extra mods that would require, but I like this short-term plan. While in the long run it would probably have been easier to save up for a faster car in the first place, I really love the F body look and will feel more accomplished if I make the speed myself.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:46 PM
  #15  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by PMHSSOCCER6
I really love the F body look and will feel more accomplished if I make the speed myself.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 09:52 PM
  #16  
PMHSSOCCER6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 Firebird base
Engine: 3.1l v6
Re: Cost for power

Thanks for the input (Oh and I'm also going to drop as much weight as I can as well- taking out the back seats will be $0.00)
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:11 PM
  #17  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

psh, not like the back seats are worth sitting in anyways
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:17 PM
  #18  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Cost for power

while nitrous has a low initial cost, its not really that cheap once u start adding in the cost of refilling the bottle.
last time i checked nitrous was 5.50$ a pound

i did a writeup on my turbo system and i figured out the cost per hp gain and the cost wa sfairly low, but everytime i turn the boost up the cost comes down since the engine makes more power but it didnt cost anyrthing to increase it
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2011 | 10:33 PM
  #19  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

how much did you turbo set up end up being? and what turbo did you use?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:00 PM
  #20  
fasteddi's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by pickle
lol, im not an old man, im 19. i just dont like the idea of nitous, it is like crack for engines. and like crack, it can really f**k stuff up
Ok well let me put a 100 shot of nitrous on my car and you put a turbo running 10psi on your car and see what last longer? Basically whoevers car was tuned the best by the person working on the car.

My point is that nitrous and a turbo use the same elements to increase horsepower and it comes down to the tuning of the person that equipted the car.

If it the motor blows up then it either wasnt able to handle the Hp or the person tuning the car didnt know exactly what he was doing.

Both n2o and a turbo can be safely used and not one is more dangerous than the other if the person knows what there doing and understands the concepts of both.

Last edited by fasteddi; Oct 20, 2011 at 05:14 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:30 PM
  #21  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by pickle
how much did you turbo set up end up being? and what turbo did you use?
off hand i dont rember, but the thread is in the power adder section when i get a lil more time today ill look for it for ya
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:34 PM
  #22  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by fasteddi
Ok well let me put a 100 shot of nitrous on my car and you put a turbo running 10psi on your car and see what last longer? Basically whoevers car was tuned the best by the person working on the car.

My point is that nitrous and a turbo use the same elements to increase horsepower and it comes down to the tuning of the person that equipted the car.

If it the motor blows up then it either wasnt able to handle the Hp or the person tuning the car didnt know exactly what he was doing.

Both n2o and a turbo can be safely used and not one is more dangerous than the other if the person knows what there doing and understands the concepts of both.

nitrous is a lil harder on the engine vs a turbo, if i were going to build a nitrous engine id keep total power output about 100hp below what i would run with a turbo engine.


but nitrous is safe if installed and tuned properly , id have no issue bolting on a 100-150 shot on a stock engine, anything more then that i would use a progressive controller
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 05:42 PM
  #23  
project89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: Cost for power

based on other builds i have witnessed i believe the results between a v6 and a tpi v8 to be very close hp wise , reliability and cost will be a whole different factor as im finding out myself with my v8 build

first up my basic v6 turbo build

92 3.1 v6

cam = 100$
headers = 150$
injectors = 125$
ms ecm = 311$
intercooler = 40$
turbo = 150$
wastegate = 50$
bov = 25$
oil lines = 75$
misc tubing = 100$
couplers n clamps = 50$

for a grand total of 1,176$'s

this combo dynoed 270 rwhp and 370rwtq @ 9 psi with timing locked out to 10* btdc

the average 3.1 will dyno right aroun 100rwhp
with that figure we come out with about $6.90 spent per 1hp added

the car actually makes more power then the dyno numbers above sine ive fixed the ignition issue but i dont have a dyno sheet to back it up. so im using my posted dyno sheets for this writeup
after fixing the timing issue that cars run low 12's @ 9 psi which should put the rwhp numbers more along the lines of 330ish.

a few ppl have told me that since it made so much tq with such limited timming that the motor would prolly make around 325whp and 410ish ftlbs at the rear wheels once that issue was fixed. which the track times support. but again without a dyno sheet i didnt want to use those figures in figuring out the cost per hp . but for the hell of it

using 325rwhp at the number for a gain of 225whp over stock =
$5.22 per hp added
here ya go,as u can see with a turbo motor any increas ein power greatly reduses the cost per each hp gained
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 10:15 PM
  #24  
pickle's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: quincy, IL
Car: 84 camaro
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Re: Cost for power

awesome results from that turbo. yes a turbo is like engine crack as well and it can and will reduce the life of an engine especially one not meant to be turbo charged. id personally prefer a turbo over nitrous any day. mostly because the power is always there ya know? you never have to refill a turbo and when you wrap it up, the power is there.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2011 | 10:21 PM
  #25  
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Cost for power

gears and a 3.4 would wake it up for cheap relatively easy.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 06:55 AM
  #26  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Cost for power

gears and a 3.5 would be better.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 01:57 PM
  #27  
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Cost for power

Not when ease and speed of swap is important I am afraid.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 09:58 AM
  #28  
oil pan 4's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 1
From: High plains of NM
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Cost for power

Power can be had cheap if you check out my V6 engine parts for sale post.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 11:24 AM
  #29  
DeathStarr89's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 2
From: Davenport, Iowa
Car: Still a 3rd Gen
Engine: 450HP 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 9" with 4.11's
Re: Cost for power

Originally Posted by Project 3.4 Camaro
Not when ease and speed of swap is important I am afraid.

It can still be done in a weekend... I took so long because i have very limited spare time.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 04:01 PM
  #30  
Project 3.4 Camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 5
From: PA
Car: 1996 Camaro, 1985 Camaro
Engine: 3.8, 3.4
Transmission: WC T5, 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23(?), 3.42
Re: Cost for power

It requires fabrication/modification, the moment there is a complication, taking a wknd is out the window.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
midge54
LTX and LSX
21
Dec 27, 2019 04:14 PM
E Rod
LTX and LSX
5
Aug 28, 2015 05:17 AM
dbrochard
History / Originality
2
Aug 25, 2015 07:23 PM
sailtexas186548
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
2
Aug 24, 2015 10:11 PM
sreZ28
Engine Swap
4
Aug 14, 2015 07:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.