V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

3.1l rwd intake vs 3.4l rwd intake

Old Jul 1, 2014 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
92camarorv6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: delaware
Car: 92 camaro rs
Engine: 3.4v6 sc
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.73s
3.1l rwd intake vs 3.4l rwd intake

ok im looking 'to seam to find it but is there any gains at all from the newer 3.4l camaro top hafe of the intake vs the older 3.1L camaro intake i know there was some work done years ago on this
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 04:46 PM
  #2  
fasteddi's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,287
Likes: 41
From: Northwest Ohio
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: Lq4 6.0 SBE s485 turbo E85
Transmission: Fsi th400 stage 4. TSI 5500 st
Axle/Gears: Strange S60 4:10s
Re: 3.1l rwd intake vs 3.4l rwd intake

No not really. And it doesnt fit quite well as the 3.4L had a DIS ignition and no dizzy. So there is fabrication involved. And IIRC they dont flow much better at least not for all the work that has to be done.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2014 | 05:05 PM
  #3  
Base91's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 1
From: Georgetown TX
Car: Base 91 'bird
Engine: 3.1 v6
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.27 & PBR
Re: 3.1l rwd intake vs 3.4l rwd intake

Easier to stick with the 3.1 top or go hybrid.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
24
Jul 6, 2024 08:32 PM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
91L98Z28
Southern California Area
10
Sep 19, 2015 09:35 AM
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 10, 2015 07:31 AM
e3pres
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Sep 9, 2015 01:51 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.