TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

TBI Vacuum adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator Kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 11:04 PM
  #1  
2kickassbirds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
Car: 1991 firebird formula
Engine: 5.8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
TBI Vacuum adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator Kit

I just found this on the TDS web site and I was wondering if it was worth is. http://www.top-downsolutions.com/pro...24f6ced8bb34b7
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #2  
vjo90RS8's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
i posted about it awhile back and found out that it is really not worth it until you get into heads and camshafts.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #3  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
It depends on your mods. I like mine because I can keep the FP down at idle but increase it at WOT.
Attached Thumbnails TBI Vacuum adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator Kit-pic-007.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 11:17 PM
  #4  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Here is one more pic of the set-up that I actually have on my car. That fist pic is not on my car.
Attached Thumbnails TBI Vacuum adjustable Fuel Pressure Regulator Kit-mvc-013s.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 01:59 AM
  #5  
TraviZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
hows the air get down in their with that huge tube in the way??

also kind of off topic, but whats the advantang of changing your fuel pressure? if i incresed my fuel pressure on ym stock l03, would i increase any performance?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 02:28 AM
  #6  
Token's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: forged 357
Transmission: 700r4, 2200-2400 stall, vette servo
Axle/Gears: stock pegleg 2.73 drum (temp)
Shifty, should I get one of those?


I'd modify my spacer ring with a grinder to keep that hose out of the way. looks like it really affects air flow man
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 07:11 AM
  #7  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Token
Shifty, should I get one of those?


I'd modify my spacer ring with a grinder to keep that hose out of the way. looks like it really affects air flow man
Yea it is not the best for airflow, but with stock heads and cam I didn't feel any difference. Since I added the cam I have re-reouted it a bit but it is not as easy as it looks. You'll see if you get one. You have to fiddle with it.

Originally posted by Traviz

also kind of off topic, but whats the advantang of changing your fuel pressure? if i incresed my fuel pressure on ym stock l03, would i increase any performance?
The advantage is if you have some mods and you need a little more fuel but don't want to thcnage the prom. Most heads and cammed LO3's only use a basic adjustble regulaotr because they control all of the fueling in the chip. It is good all around because you can keep the pressure down at idle prevent it from running rich like a lot of other regulaotrs will leave you.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #8  
Low C1500's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
I don't like the vac regulators at all. I ran one last year and had nothing but problems, with quick accel engine stumbles. With running high pressure , the thing would casue big spikes in my pressure (only for a split sec). Motor runs better with no vac reg and a ltittle lower fuel pressure. They do however band-aid fix a cam install, without having to burn proms.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 10:25 AM
  #9  
seanof30306's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 10
From: Tulsa, OK
Car: 1989 Formula WS6
Engine: L03 305 TBI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt; 3.42 Posi
shifty,

running that vacuum hose around to the front sure looks like it's restricting the airflow. wouldn't it be better to hav it exit at the rear?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 12:01 PM
  #10  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by seanof30306
shifty,

running that vacuum hose around to the front sure looks like it's restricting the airflow. wouldn't it be better to hav it exit at the rear?
I need to look into getting a thiner and more flexible hose. The way the vacuum line comes out is angled and forces the line to go towards the front of the TBI. It is already bent to clear the side of the intake spacer or open element (depending on non drop or drop). It does restrict air flow but since I had stock heads and cam at the time I really didn't care. What I need to do is route it out the side or down and out of the open element. It is tricky peice let me tell you......
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #11  
Low C1500's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
When I had one, I just grabbed that little vac line and bent it 1/3 of a trun to the back, then drilled a hole in the bottom of my air cleaner, to slide the vac hose through.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 04:13 PM
  #12  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Cut the bend off of the vac fitting on the fpr. Install a molded 90 degree vac fitting and use some of the small hard plastic line GM uses for the vac canister, etc. Route the line out the back of the TB where the fuel lines enter.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #13  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Low C1500
When I had one, I just grabbed that little vac line and bent it 1/3 of a trun to the back, then drilled a hole in the bottom of my air cleaner, to slide the vac hose through.
Yea that is a good idea. I was planning on that but just never got to it. once I re route it I should have pics. Getting rid of that gold spacer will really help.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #14  
JokerRS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: Alburnett,Iowa,USA
Car: 92RS
Engine: 357
Transmission: 700R4
I turned the regulator 90*, trimed the length down and ran it out the back. I had to trim a tab on the flange to be abile to turn it 90*. Mine worked real good when I was running a LT1 cam. I was using about 15 lbs of pressure ( with no vacuum connected). I am running strait pressure with my setup now.

Shifty, get that darn hose out of the flow or we'll fire you as a moderater. Ya got to set a better example then that.

Last edited by JokerRS; Apr 1, 2004 at 04:53 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 04:53 PM
  #15  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
i tried it and did not like it. i needed more fuel down low as well as up top. i could have added more fuel down low with high FP and then regulate excess fuel on top with another REG but decided not worth it. issues with on gas hard and off and back on. imagine a road course. the vac signal not immediate enough and the vafpr slow to react. running independent of computer control. running large injectors with tuning was a better way to manage fuel.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 05:11 PM
  #16  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Ronny
i tried it and did not like it. i needed more fuel down low as well as up top. i could have added more fuel down low with high FP and then regulate excess fuel on top with another REG but decided not worth it. issues with on gas hard and off and back on. imagine a road course. the vac signal not immediate enough and the vafpr slow to react. running independent of computer control. running large injectors with tuning was a better way to manage fuel.
I cured that problem by running a delay valve. That way when I was off or on the throttle vacuum signal did not spike. I have great luck with mine so far.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #17  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
There's a cal out there that takes in to consideration the fuel flow changes of the vac ref fpr.

Last edited by va454ss; Apr 1, 2004 at 05:15 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #18  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by va454ss
There's a cal out there that takes in to consideration the fuel flow changes of the vac ref fpr.
A cal?
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 08:06 AM
  #19  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
A cal?
http://www.efitune.com/forum/index.p...=ST&f=17&t=98&
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 09:25 AM
  #20  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Oh I see. Neat stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 09:04 AM
  #21  
va454ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Car: 90 454SS
Engine: 454 TBI
Transmission: TH400
This will help with running high fp's for WOT
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92camaroJoe
TBI
32
Jul 29, 2023 07:57 PM
MustangBeater20
TBI
11
Oct 29, 2022 09:20 PM
wayshegoes
Tech / General Engine
8
Aug 17, 2015 12:00 PM
92camaroJoe
Tech / General Engine
6
Aug 13, 2015 06:07 AM
89-S-dime
TBI
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:57 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM.