Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Misleading Mustangs and Fraudulent Fords

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 07:24 AM
  #1  
89IROCZZ4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Misleading Mustangs and Fraudulent Fords

As my wife and I were walking through the mall last night, I wanted to check in to the nearest bookstore to browse the web development books and possibly some car magazines. On the first magazine rack, what do I see? A magazine with a '02 SS Camaro VS. a '03 Cobra. I thought to myself hmmm....this doesn't seem right...normally they put cars up against each other that are the same year. Then it goes to say something along the lines of "The last ponycar shootout...who will win?" I was like WHAT??? Shouldn't that be vs. a '02 Cobra? Sure enough, I check the name of the magazine...it's our friends over at Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords Magazine. They also "forgot" to mention it was a '02 SS by saying "The all new '03 Cobra Vs. the SS Camaro". HA!!!! They couldn't beat the SS in the same year, so they had to wait when the fbody was gone before they could win. Face it, Ford! You are racing a ghost! You lost and we won. By the way, even though they kept saying dumb things about the SS all the way through the article, they still went ahead and said the Cobra ran a 12.8 @ 108 (I think?) and the SS ran a 13.2 @ 107 (I think?). Either way, it was only a 4/10ths second and 1 mph difference. And to think Ford needed to put on a supercharger on their top performer to get to this!
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 09:55 AM
  #2  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
I read that mag at work last nite. Seems a little unfair to me, but either way, both cars seem to be awesome. The mag got a 12.70 out of the Cobra and a 13.23 out of the SS. They said the times could have been better but they were facing head winds of 25mph.
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
Mustang5L5's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Revere, MA
Evan Smoth was the driver, he's also the same guy that does the driving for GM high performance. This guy gets cars to run what nobody else can. He's the guy who ran a 12.9 in an Z/28 while testing it against a bullitt. MM&FF reported the time and had nothing bad to say about the car in either article.

The '02 vs '03 thing doesn't get to me. The '03 CObra is technically a mid '02 car...but labelled an '03.

I thought they could have gotten better times out of both cars.

Can't wait til they start modding a '03 CObra (which they hinted they would be soon)
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 02:37 PM
  #4  
Damon's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 13
From: Philly, PA
Well, 4 valves per cylinder doesn't really make up for a full liter less displacement, I guess. Unless you strap a blower on it!

I don't think Ford had much choice, if they wanted to seriously compete for Horsepower versus the LS-1. That motor is so good right out of the box it's scary- pushrods and all.

Remember the 80s when 5.0 Mustangs would regularly stomp IROCs and T/As? I guess Ford got sick of having FBodies kicking sand in the face of the Mustang for the next full decade.
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
So basically Ford wins, because the Camaro is gone. The 03 Mustang verse the 03 Camaro, who would win. The fact that there was no 02 Mustang Cobra means the 03 verse 02 is fair. If you look at the dunos you will see. 317 for the GM, and 381 for the Stang, wow what a difference!!! But for 35,000, the closest thing is a C5 which is slower, only seats two, and still costs 5,000 more! So for all the making fun of the car it is one of the best bang for bucks on the market today with all the 2003 models, not the discontinued 2002s!
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:28 PM
  #6  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
As I've said previously:

99% of you guys are cool, but some of you need to open your eyes and realize that a brand is nothing more than a badge on a bumper. Any fast car is cool whether its made by Ford, GM, Toyota, Ferrari, or whoever.
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:32 PM
  #7  
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 3
From: Changing Tires
Car: too many ...
I think we all win because racing is fun.
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 10:34 PM
  #8  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
I think we all win because racing is fun.
:rockon: :rockon: :rockon:
Old Jun 27, 2002 | 11:50 PM
  #9  
Camaro_1986_19's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Lehighton, PA
Mustangs ****en suck and so do ricers, I will take any POS MOUSESTANG ON IN MY 92 Z28
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 06:49 AM
  #10  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Any day of the week that you want to line 'em up for an *** whooping, just let me know :nono:
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 07:02 AM
  #11  
89IROCZZ4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I'll run ya, Nic!
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 07:54 AM
  #12  
Camaro_1986_19's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Lehighton, PA
LMMFAO!!! Why would I even waste my time on a ****en Rustang? THIS IS A CAMARO BOARD, ***
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 08:08 AM
  #13  
DakotaSLT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Virginia/Delaware
Wow, I sense a lot hate here. I think we oughta ease off Nic, 5.0, and 5L5. They don't post flames, even when provoked (hmm, where have they been provoked), and they give us valuble information about Mustangs, which is one of the cars we run against all the time. That makes them cool in my book, why should there only be Camaros on this board? Why do we need to exclude everyone else? I know we've had this argument in other posts, but I'm chipping in my .02. They didn't say anything to hurt anyone else, leave 'em alone.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 09:44 AM
  #14  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
You're right...it would be a waste of time for us to run. We already know what the outcome would be anyway :nono:
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 01:13 PM
  #15  
89IROCZZ4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Hmmm...I'm not sure how a mustang would ever beat an IROC that is a second faster

Last edited by 89IROCZZ4; Jun 28, 2002 at 01:16 PM.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #16  
Synapsis's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
From: Tucson - MdFormula350 = Post uberWhore
Car: Sexy
Engine: Stock
Transmission: Slipping
I know Nic's LX would beat my Iroc, that's why if I run against him, he's connecting a tow rope to my car first.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 01:39 PM
  #17  
ATOMonkey's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis IN
HHHMMMM

Last edited by ATOMonkey; Jun 28, 2002 at 01:42 PM.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #18  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
In 02 the Camaro was faster, there was no plans to make the car any faster than it had to be to be faster than M*****gs of the same model year which is a reason why they stayed with the same engine and nearly the same HP and TQ instead of going all out for the Anniversary. (besides them not wanting to spend more money or do more work on the this Gen) The other car is an 03 and thats all there is to it, it just came out, there shouldn't have been a comparison.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 01:58 PM
  #19  
89BlueTA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: Tecumseh,Mi,USA
I am glad they did the comparison, it shows how slow the new cobra really is.

Cobra = 106 mph
Camaro= 106 mph

Supercharger+Heat = Slow

The N/A old pushrod camaro pulls damn near *** hard as the mustang with all the fancy crap and a supercharger on it. What a beater.


nick
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 02:10 PM
  #20  
Synapsis's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
From: Tucson - MdFormula350 = Post uberWhore
Car: Sexy
Engine: Stock
Transmission: Slipping
Cmon now, we're all domestic lovers here... can't we get along?

We must eliminate the import threat...
the Honda Insight is running 18.1 @ 75 in the 1/4.


Man, I've gotta lay off the caffeine.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 02:49 PM
  #21  
Camaro_1986_19's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Lehighton, PA
I hate ricers a helluva lot more then Mustangs, Especially the ones where their mommy and daddy buy them their cars.
Nick I'm sorry dude, In my mind, Camaro's are the best, I
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 04:49 PM
  #22  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by 5.0mustang
But for 35,000, the closest thing is a C5 which is slower, only seats two, and still costs 5,000 more! So for all the making fun of the car it is one of the best bang for bucks on the market today with all the 2003 models, not the discontinued 2002s!
You forgot to mention that the C5 will out handle the Mustang any day of the week and has a lot of standard options that the Mustang doesn't. That's why it costs $5k more.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 05:05 PM
  #23  
Rudy's90irocZ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Seymour Johnson Air Force Base N.C.
I am a camaro owner, but an american v8 is an american v8.
Ultimately, that's what we are all about, I hope....I know that describes me, I've owned ford, chevy(and GM),and currently own a 97 dodge truck. I just love the sound of american v8's
Rudy
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 07:59 PM
  #24  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
What standard options.

IRS, both standard.
Leather, both standard.
CD, both standard.
6-speed, both standard.

You give me a list of standard options and we will see.

I know the Vette outhandles it but the Mustang out handles the Camaro and seats 4 unlike the Vette. The insurance is less, but the appeal of the Vette is higher. I think bang for buck, you can't beat the Cobra, supercharger or not.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 08:00 PM
  #25  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Geez people, I own a Camaro and Stang now, get over it, they're both great cars in their own ways.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 08:11 PM
  #26  
Z28z's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: DC Metro area
Car: 91 Camaro Z/28
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: TH700-R4
Yeah I think people need to stop whinning like b**ches about whos better or not. Just cause you have a brand loyalty doesn't mean you should hate all others. I love Chevy but it doesn't mean I can't appreciate a nice Mustang when I see one. Now ricers thats a different story
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 08:51 PM
  #27  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by 5.0mustang
What standard options.

IRS, both standard.
Leather, both standard.
CD, both standard.
6-speed, both standard.

You give me a list of standard options and we will see.
SVT Cobra standard equip:
leather-wrapped steering wheel; Composite hood and trunk; leather boots for the shift and parking brake levers; tilt steering wheel; power windows, mirrors, door locks and trunk release; the SecuriLock passive anti-theft system; remote keyless entry; speed (cruise) control; and a MACH 460 audio system with AM/FM stereo and an in-dash, six-disc CD player; and 8 way driver/4 way pass. power leather seats, air conditioning, traction control, stainless steel exhaust, fog lamps, cup holders, floor mats, variable speed wipers, 16city 25hwy

Corvette standard equip:
Active handling system, Composite body, Traction control, Dual electric remote-control heated sport mirrors, Air conditioning, Floor mats, Rear-window defogger, Cruise control, Low tire pressure warning system, cup holders, variable speed wipers, Active Remote Keyless Entry System, PASS-Key theft-deterrent system with horn alarm, Power door locks , stainless steel exhaust, 6 way power seats, 19 city, 28 hwy

They're very close, I did miss a few standard equipment options for the Vette. The Corvette does only have a few things over the Cobra in standard equip.

The reason the Vette has two seats is because it's a 'sports car'. The reason the Mustang has 4 is because it's a 'pony car'. They're not even in the same category. Now if Ford actually made a SVT Thunderbird.....

They're both definitely easy on your wallet when it comes to performance. I am definitely amazed that Ford could pull off such a low sticker price.

Last edited by iroc22; Jun 28, 2002 at 08:59 PM.
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 11:05 PM
  #28  
tamatt27's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
I agree. All muscle cars are great in their respective classes. And this is a THIRD GEN F-BODY Board, not just a Camaro, or just a Firebird/Trans Am board. Let's all appreciate the domestics and not hate the foreigners. Even though their mommies DO buy their cars for them, and just because they have fart mufflers doesn't make them fast! I have a stock! 305 TBI and I beat some ricers. And my car is slow!....well for me.....for the time being. I appreciate any American car that is well maintained and/or fast! Anyway, that's just me........anyone else???

Thanks for lettin' me ramble.......
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 11:19 PM
  #29  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Hmmm...I'm not sure how a mustang would ever beat an IROC that is a second faster
I won't talking about you...
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:19 AM
  #30  
bigals87z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,456
Likes: 3
From: Ocean, NJ
Car: Check The Sig
hey to all u mustang guys backin the new cobra... no one else saw it with there own eyes... if u read the article they did there sh%t down in my back yard.... i saw both cars...... the camaro did as well as the camaro and the cobra has a lot more done to it already.... IRS, SC, Bigger brakes... so ford basicly found the only way to beat on the camaro... by kicking it when it was down..... hell if the camaro was still in production..... all us GM guys know the f-bodies would be upgraded to come and kick that heavy POS... hell u could strap on a SC a ls1... and then lets take it to the track.... I read that stupid article in MM&FF... I got so mad at that stupid mag..... they were like.."it took $10,000 to take the z/28 to the 35th SS model..." yea well it took 15,000 to take a GT to a Cobra....
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:29 AM
  #31  
trans87's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, SoCali
Car: 2006 Tacoma X-Runner
Engine: 4.0L DOHC V6
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3:15 LSD
Man enough with the us vs. the Stangs. Everytime someone post an article with a Mustang in it flame wars start. Mustangs are just another domestic performance car out there. The cars I don't like are imports. The way things are going now of days we need as many domestic performance vehicles as possible. Stop bickering among the ranks and face the real enemy Camaros are fast Mustangs are fast and there is always going to be a faster one on each side.
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:53 AM
  #32  
tamatt27's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
Truer words have never been spoken!
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 05:08 AM
  #33  
SSupaNatural's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: fivepointsevenleeters
Transmission: nothing right now
*sighs*..... why are there SOOo many closeminded f-body owners? Yea I share your pain about the discontinuation, but ya gotta learn to open your mind outside your thirdgen. Take Women for instance. Would you (if given the chance) only fuc women of your nationality?! If you answer yes, you are missing out... examples: Kim Cattrel, Hale Berry, Anna Kornikova, Salma hayek, Alyssa Milano, Tayra Banks, Lucy Lui, Tera Patrick, etc.etc. See what I mean? OPEN YOUR MIND!!! So what if their car doesnt have a bowtie or bird on their cars? I bet that the ppl who mod their own cars have busted knuckles/grease in the fingernails/swear at their cars JUST LIKE YOU!!! er US!!!
I like this phrase I saw...."Bring what'cha want..just make sure you bring enough!!" As for mustangs, IMO, I like the foxbody cobra (black) the best.
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 08:23 AM
  #34  
89IROCZZ4's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
From: Houston
lol...I think this is hilarious!!! I only started this thread because of how rediculous it was for MM & FF to post such trash.... "The last showdown: 2003 Cobra VS 2002 SS" ????? This is BS and everyone knows it. If they wanted a "last showdown", they should have matched it year for year. Guess why they didn't...because the SS would have S L A U G H T E R E D the Cobra. But you know something? Maybe you are right...maybe it is okay for the 03' Cobra to take on the '02 SS. I mean, afterall it is only a supercharger they bolted on (mainly) to make the '03 Cobra different from the '02 Cobra, right? If that is the case, why don't we go ahead and slap on a 'charger on the '02 SS? OOOOHHHHhhh...that's right! I remember why they don't....because the SS would run close to a second faster that the Cobra. I'm not trying to rip on any mustang owners out there - one of my best friends owns an older Cobra and I love it. I just hate seeing these stupid ford publications that print misleading crap like this. I went over to my wife's folks house and saw a mustang magazine over there and they were saying something along the lines of "with the mustang being the dominant muscle car of the 80's and 90's...." I was like WHAAA???? You be the judge on that one!
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 09:35 AM
  #35  
Jer82Z28's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Alberta, Canada
Car: 1987 IROC
Engine: Vortec 350 TPI
Transmission: 7004r
Originally posted by 5.0mustang
What standard options.

IRS, both standard.
Leather, both standard.
CD, both standard.
6-speed, both standard.

You give me a list of standard options and we will see.

I know the Vette outhandles it but the Mustang out handles the Camaro and seats 4 unlike the Vette. The insurance is less, but the appeal of the Vette is higher. I think bang for buck, you can't beat the Cobra, supercharger or not.
The mustang certaintly does not out handle the camaro, not even the cobra does. Did you read MM&FF's article?
the cobra beat the camaro by a whopping 3 tenths in laptimes despite camaros 60hp disadvantage!
camaros have always handled just as well, often better than the cobra.

the best 1/4mile times for both cars netted them the same mph, which I found odd. the cobra did pull a 109 earlier though.

I don't understand what the big fuss is about, it's common sense that magazines and everyone else would want to bench race the last the camaros against ford's new monster cobra. Get a life ppl!!

Even the ford magazine said the SS is an awesome car.
just because the cobra has a blower and 60more hp does not mean the camaro is trash.

At least ford didn't wuss out and make the mustang a V6 only sport compact...
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:15 PM
  #36  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Hehe.
Attached Thumbnails Misleading Mustangs and Fraudulent Fords-iroc-mustang-5-copy.jpg  
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:22 PM
  #37  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
89iroczz4, the motor is NOT the Cobra motor with a supercharger bolted on. The block is different, the internals are different along with many other factors. They did not take a Cobra motor with 320hp and bolt on a blower. They took a motor with probably 200 something hp and bolted on a blower. If GM put a blower on a Camaro it would destroy the car in 30,000 miles, because the motor was not built for boost. You better believe GM would redo the LS1 to take the blower, and it would not start off at 325 hp, it would be very detuned!
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:30 PM
  #38  
Z28z's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: DC Metro area
Car: 91 Camaro Z/28
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: TH700-R4
Actually if you put a blower on a regular camaro engine it would not blow it in 30,000. There are plenty of people running around with supercherged camaros with plenty of miles. It all depnds on how much boost you are pushing.
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:36 PM
  #39  
Synapsis's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
From: Tucson - MdFormula350 = Post uberWhore
Car: Sexy
Engine: Stock
Transmission: Slipping
Originally posted by Z28z
Actually if you put a blower on a regular camaro engine it would not blow it in 30,000. There are plenty of people running around with supercherged camaros with plenty of miles. It all depnds on how much boost you are pushing.
This may be true, but what are the chances on GM providing a warranty on that setup?

Mark A Shields - Did you polish your wheels recently?
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 12:52 PM
  #40  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Originally posted by 5.0mustang
89iroczz4, the motor is NOT the Cobra motor with a supercharger bolted on. The block is different, the internals are different along with many other factors. They did not take a Cobra motor with 320hp and bolt on a blower.
From what I read, they did take the Cobra motor, used dished pistons and Manley H-beam connecting rods. I'm sure the Cobra motor could take the 8lbs.
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 01:13 PM
  #41  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by Synapsis




Mark A Shields - Did you polish your wheels recently?
I polished them around March/April. Just got new center caps for them.

But I did just lose a louver going down the road, so I took the other off, need to get new ones, they're $90 though.
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 01:32 PM
  #42  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
It has a different block, Manley H-beam rods, and ARP fasteners. It has dished forged pistons like the Lightning, and a 90mm Mass air meter. All of these are not found on the regular Cobra. Also not on the Cobra is the 8.5 compression ratio. The cams are regrounf, and the heads have been changed a little, and the intake is obviousley different. The car has a curb weight of over 3700 lbs. If you factored all these things into an LS1 you would be surprised by the outcome.

If you put a supercharger on an LS1, GM would not give you a 3year/36,000 mile warrenty, you better believe that.
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 07:20 PM
  #43  
88ROC1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Weelllll, as for the supercharged LS1, check out the latest GMHTP and you will see the yellow vette with a supercharger, stock block, crank, pistons, cam, and heads. It is a Lingerfelter design that comes with a 3 YEAR 30,000 mile warranty. F.Y.I it ran a 11.56 at 127. 490 horses!
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 07:25 PM
  #44  
Don_89Iroc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: fairmont WV USA
look at the pic that mark posted holy crap, i dont know which car is faster......but i know one thing for sure his camaro looks hella better than that mustang!!!! HELLA BETTER!!!! hands down Nuff Said
Old Jun 29, 2002 | 09:18 PM
  #45  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Originally posted by Don_89Iroc
look at the pic that mark posted holy crap, i dont know which car is faster......but i know one thing for sure his camaro looks hella better than that mustang!!!! HELLA BETTER!!!! hands down Nuff Said
The IROC would destroy my 4 cyl 5spd, but if it were a distance race on 1 tank of gas no contest. I've gotten 220 miles on a 1/2 tank in the Stang, 180 miles to a whole tank in the IROC.
Old Jun 30, 2002 | 04:06 PM
  #46  
88ROC1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 88ROC1LE
Weelllll, as for the supercharged LS1, check out the latest GMHTP and you will see the yellow vette with a supercharger, stock block, crank, pistons, cam, and heads. It is a Lingerfelter design that comes with a 3 YEAR 30,000 mile warranty. F.Y.I it ran a 11.56 at 127. 490 horses!
Old Jun 30, 2002 | 10:02 PM
  #47  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
And for $35,000

NOPE!!!
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 12:51 AM
  #48  
foxandfoe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I own both wanna go fast there is no better than a mustang.
Wanna take a corner then go for the bird. Want reliability mustang wins out there.
cheap parts, parts availability again mustang. pic up any catolog and see for yourself. Can you say youve owned both? not just driven there is a difference i currently own both. I can says i like the looks of the bird better and will be trading my 92 in for a newer one. As for the cobra if i had the 38,500. i'd by one my boss did and it runs like no other. and it it can take a bend due to the irs. stop to thanks to the 13" bair front brakes. Wanna race?
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 10:44 AM
  #49  
88ROC1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 5.0mustang


If you put a supercharger on an LS1, GM would not give you a 3year/36,000 mile warrenty, you better believe that.
I didn't see anything about price in this quote that I was responding to. Besides that, who cares which is better, in a few years they will be just like our thirdgens and fox bodies. Something new will come along and make these seem like slugs.
Old Jul 1, 2002 | 11:34 PM
  #50  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
LMMFAO!!! Why would I even waste my time on a ****en Rustang? THIS IS A CAMARO BOARD, ***
then you made this reply

Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
Does anyone know info on Ford Aerostar's????
then there are these


Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
Mustangs ****en suck and so do ricers, I will take any POS MOUSESTANG ON IN MY 92 Z28
92Z huh, then why would you drive your moms van if your big bad 2.8 breaks down


Originally posted by Camaro_1986_19
Aerostar's are awesome vans dude, They have power!, I have one as a back up car in case my Camaro breaks down, It's an 86 Aerostar XLT with the 3.0 V6. My dad has a 1997 Aerostar XLT, It has the bigger 4.0, V6. These vans are great for racing!
you hate mustangs and think they arent **** for racing but then the new aerostar is an asskicker lol



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 PM.